Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Dixon; Max Harold (Kent, OH), Young; Austin Gale (Wadsworth, OH), Hermann; Robert John (Cuyahoga Falls, OH)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Dixon; Max Harold Young; Austin Gale Hermann; Robert John Kent Wadsworth Cuyahoga Falls OH OH OH US US US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/419,731
Filed:	May 1, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/600
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/568-603,900-901,564 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D334369	March 1993	Christenbury
D347606	June 1994	Mehta
D394029	May 1998	Gillard et al.
D394034	May 1998	Feider et al.
D405741	February 1999	Weber et al.
D448707	October 2001	Maziarka et al.
D451860	December 2001	Schuster et al.
D458584	June 2002	Young et al.
D473513	April 2003	Welbes
D481005	October 2003	Umstot et al.
D517471	March 2006	Robert
D517978	March 2006	Robert
D527338	August 2006	Suzuki
D554055	October 2007	Beauguitte et al.
D560600	January 2008	Dixon et al.
D581347	November 2008	Feider et al.
D583310	December 2008	Dixon et al.
D583311	December 2008	Bonko et al.
D585364	January 2009	Shondel et al.
D592589	May 2009	Dixon et al.
D592590	May 2009	Janesh et al.
D599282	September 2009	Nicolas
D601085	September 2009	Janesh et al.
D602853	October 2009	Nopper et al.
D604226	November 2009	Scheuren
D604228	November 2009	Le et al.
D604229	November 2009	Le et al.
D605107	December 2009	Ludwig et al.
D605108	December 2009	Brown et al.
D607812	January 2010	Dixon et al.
D609169	February 2010	Feider
D609175	February 2010	Feider et al.
D610971	March 2010	Zimmerman et al.
D610972	March 2010	You
D620430	July 2010	Gillard et al.
D637147	May 2011	Buchinger-Barnstorf et al.
D642511	August 2011	Strader et al.
D642974	August 2011	Koshio
D643804	August 2011	Dixon et al.
D644599	September 2011	Nicolas et al.
D644600	September 2011	Nicolas et al.
D645806	September 2011	Dixon et al.
D646220	October 2011	Tamura
D647040	October 2011	Mathonet et al.
D648673	November 2011	Koog
D660223	May 2012	Dixon et al.
D661641	June 2012	Oki et al.
D662037	June 2012	Nobunaga
D675981	February 2013	Kuwahara
D685724	July 2013	Jacobs
D700133	February 2014	Takahashi

Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.