Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective of a tire showing a portion of the tread pattern of my new design;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevation view of a segment of the tread pattern thereof;

FIG. 3 is a perspective of a tire showing a portion of the tread pattern of a second embodiment of my new design;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevation view of a segment of the tread pattern shown in FIG. 3; and,

FIG. 5 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevation view of a segment of the tread pattern of a tire showing a third embodiment of my new design it being understood that the tire is the same as those of the first and second embodiments shown schematically by solid lines in FIGS. 1 and 3 respectively and is omitted for convenience of illustration.

The tread pattern is understood to be repeated uniformly throughout the circumference of all three embodiments of the tire as shown schematically by solid lines in FIGS. 1 and 3 of the drawing, and the opposite side of the three embodiments of the tire is substantially the same as that shown in FIGS. 1 and 3.

Claims

The ornamental design for the tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Mehta; Ajay (Greer, SC)
Assignee:	Michelin Recherche et Technique S.A. (Granges-Paccot, CH)
Appl. No.:	07/837,529
Filed:	February 18, 1992

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/600
Field of Search:	;152/29R,29B,29D ;D12/140,141-143,146-151

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D279088	June 1985	Giron
D283698	May 1986	Kawabata et al.
D294240	February 1988	Lachamp
D311366	October 1990	Kuroda
D334369	March 1993	Christenbury
D334370	March 1993	White
D334371	March 1993	Hodges

Other References

1991 Tire Design Guide p. 46 Michelin X M+S 100. . 1991 Tire Design Guide p. 46 Michelin X M+S 300..

Primary Examiner: Gandy; James M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Csontos; Alan A. Reed; Robert R.