Tire

Uphouse , et al. January 22, 2

Patent Grant D674743

U.S. patent number D674,743 [Application Number D/428,407] was granted by the patent office on 2013-01-22 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is Joel Joseph Lazeration, Hiram William Uphouse, Richard Mark Wieland. Invention is credited to Joel Joseph Lazeration, Hiram William Uphouse, Richard Mark Wieland.


United States Patent D674,743
Uphouse ,   et al. January 22, 2013

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental Design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Uphouse; Hiram William (Uniontown, OH), Wieland; Richard Mark (Akron, OH), Lazeration; Joel Joseph (Copley, OH)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Uphouse; Hiram William
Wieland; Richard Mark
Lazeration; Joel Joseph

Uniontown
Akron
Copley

OH
OH
OH

US
US
US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/428,407
Filed: July 31, 2012

Current U.S. Class: D12/600
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/568-603,900-901,563-567 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D397648 September 1998 Allen et al.
D403281 December 1998 Allen et al.
D421584 March 2000 Lovell et al.
D421942 March 2000 Fierro et al.
D421943 March 2000 Fierro et al.
D422246 April 2000 Fierro et al.
D448707 October 2001 Maziarka et al.
D452199 December 2001 Robert et al.
D465763 November 2002 Umstot et al.
D481005 October 2003 Umstot et al.
D500288 December 2004 Maziarka et al.
D554055 October 2007 Beauguitte et al.
D589438 March 2009 Heinen et al.
D602853 October 2009 Nopper et al.
D610076 February 2010 Tobino
D615485 May 2010 Hamada
D620430 July 2010 Gillard et al.
D627713 November 2010 Le et al.
D631001 January 2011 Hughes et al.
D631428 January 2011 Yonetsu
D639235 June 2011 Reim et al.
D641313 July 2011 Metzger et al.
D643804 August 2011 Dixon et al.
D645810 September 2011 Le et al.
D660223 May 2012 Dixon et al.
D661640 June 2012 Krier
Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed