Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the left side elevational view being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim, that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is a mirror image thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and the broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Delu; Jerome Marcel Germain (Bridel, LU), Houchard; Stephane (Orgeo, BE), Wagner; Carine Yvonne Jeanne (Dudelange, LU), Caron; Arnaud (Signeulx, BE), Leconte; Armand Rene Gabriel (Bigonville, LU), Bhagavathapuram Srisailapathy; Ananth (Ettelbruck, LU)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/627,751
Filed:	November 29, 2017

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/553
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/533-567,604

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D379448	May 1997	Graas et al.
D379787	June 1997	Maxwell et al.
D409123	May 1999	Heinen
D437269	February 2001	Slingluff
D451853	December 2001	Heinen
D452198	December 2001	Heinen
D455116	April 2002	Graas et al.
D467864	December 2002	Whetzel
D504106	April 2005	de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D504866	May 2005	Collette et al.
D505112	May 2005	Heinen et al.
D506971	July 2005	Iga
D512682	December 2005	Krenz et al.
D526955	August 2006	Heinen
D559770	January 2008	Blackiston
D579861	November 2008	Haas et al.
D583305	December 2008	Ashton et al.
D586728	February 2009	Heinen et al.
D592588	May 2009	Heinen et al.
D595639	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D596109	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D596558	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D597475	August 2009	Heinen et al.
D601946	October 2009	Fontaine et al.
D610964	March 2010	Dixon et al.
D612324	March 2010	Harvey
D615479	May 2010	Lee
D622657	August 2010	Leocadio et al.
D635912	April 2011	Knispel
D638350	May 2011	Knispel
D640184	June 2011	de Briey-Terlinden
D641305	July 2011	de Briey-Terlinden
D702625	April 2014	Leconte et al.
D720683	January 2015	Boore
D721638	January 2015	Knispel
D722554	February 2015	Knispel et al.
D722555	February 2015	Knispel et al.
D723453	March 2015	Knispel et al.
D754058	April 2016	Caron et al.
D756292	May 2016	Yoon
D756895	May 2016	Pons et al.
D756896	May 2016	Leconte et al.
D777092	January 2017	Leconte et al.
D777649	January 2017	Ropars
D786181	May 2017	Caron et al.
D794545	August 2017	Houchard et al.
D794546	August 2017	Caron et al.
D795167	August 2017	Houchard et al.
9855801	January 2018	Kameda

Primary Examiner: Rosati; Brandon M
Assistant Examiner: Voytek; John A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipesik; Robert N.

Images