Tire

Caron , et al. August 15, 2

Patent Grant D794546

U.S. patent number D794,546 [Application Number D/542,263] was granted by the patent office on 2017-08-15 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Pierre Bernard Raoul Brochet, Arnaud Caron.


United States Patent D794,546
Caron ,   et al. August 15, 2017

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Caron; Arnaud (Signeulx, BE), Brochet; Pierre Bernard Raoul (Itzig, LU)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/542,263
Filed: October 13, 2015

Current U.S. Class: D12/564
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/533-567

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D362420 September 1995 Heinen et al.
D379448 May 1997 Graas et al.
D379449 May 1997 Graas et al.
D379787 June 1997 Maxwell et al.
D387714 December 1997 Heinen
D423426 April 2000 Ratliff, Jr.
D429194 August 2000 Heinen et al.
D429478 August 2000 Heinen et al.
D431800 October 2000 Heinen et al.
D441328 May 2001 Heinen et al.
D441695 May 2001 Heinen et al.
D451068 November 2001 Heinen et al.
D451868 December 2001 Graas et al.
D452198 December 2001 Heinen et al.
D455116 April 2002 Graas et al.
D455998 April 2002 Heinen et al.
D462647 September 2002 Heinen
D491129 June 2004 Maxwell
D503374 March 2005 Maxwell
D504106 April 2005 de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D504387 April 2005 Welbes et al.
D504866 May 2005 Collette et al.
D505112 May 2005 Heinen et al.
D513729 January 2006 Lash
D533131 December 2006 Fontaine et al.
D548677 August 2007 Welbes et al.
D548678 August 2007 Welbes et al.
D556670 December 2007 Fontaine et al.
D575726 August 2008 Fontaine et al.
D579861 November 2008 Haas et al.
D579864 November 2008 Haas et al.
D586728 February 2009 Heinen et al.
D589874 April 2009 Fontaine et al.
D591221 April 2009 Fontaine et al.
D591672 May 2009 de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D592588 May 2009 Heinen et al.
D595639 July 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D595640 July 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D596109 July 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D597475 August 2009 Heinen et al.
D597476 August 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D598367 August 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D599730 September 2009 Mukai
D600195 September 2009 Fontaine et al.
D601946 October 2009 Fontaine et al.
D606007 December 2009 Fontaine et al.
D610964 March 2010 Dixon et al.
D610973 March 2010 Dixon et al.
D614116 April 2010 Scheifele
D622657 August 2010 Leocadio et al.
D627292 November 2010 Terashima
D635912 April 2011 Knispel
D638350 May 2011 Knispel
D640184 June 2011 de Briey-Terlinden
D640966 July 2011 Fontaine et al.
D641305 July 2011 de Briey-Terlinden
D645393 September 2011 Kiwaki
D662454 June 2012 Fontaine et al.
D721638 January 2015 Knispel
D722554 February 2015 Knispel et al.
D749495 February 2016 Wang
Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Assistant Examiner: Voytek; John
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the other side being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

The dark stippled surface shading represents the recessed portion of the tread grooves having a depth as best shown in FIG. 2.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed