Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the notches and triangles within the notches in the intermediary ribs, sidewall, inner bead, peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Fontaine; Sebastien Willy (Vichten, LU), Leconte; Armand Rene Gabriel (Bigonville, LU), Han; Bingshan (Ettelbruck, LU), Tuccella; Franck (Lexy, FR), Jardot; Gregory (Hettange-Grande, FR), Dhaeze; Ronnie Roger (Thiaumont, BE), Jung; Manfred Josef (Freisen, DE), Ossipov; Alexander (Leuven, BE), Villamizar; William Urbano (Mersch, LU)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/522,492
Filed:	March 31, 2015

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/588; D12/590
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/559,564,586,588,589,590,591,594,595,598,600,601,602,603

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D432956	October 2000	Ricquet
D451453	December 2001	Maxwell et al.
D483007	December 2003	Brayer
D522442	June 2006	Shirouzu
D559767	January 2008	Graas et al.
D579865	November 2008	Matsuyama
D586724	February 2009	Seibert et al.
D586725	February 2009	Fontaine et al.
D586734	February 2009	Bindner
D593931	June 2009	Fontaine et al.
D597474	August 2009	Yamakawa et al.
D601939	October 2009	Fontaine et al.
D604231	November 2009	Hada
D606002	December 2009	Yamakawa et al.
D607809	January 2010	Fontaine et al.
D609161	February 2010	Fontaine et al.
D613240	April 2010	Mukai
D634699	March 2011	Fontaine et al.
D638348	May 2011	Harvey et al.
D639719	June 2011	Harvey et al.
D639720	June 2011	Harvey et al.
D644592	September 2011	Grabo et al.
D644593	September 2011	Fontaine et al.
D659075	May 2012	Harvey et al.
D659633	May 2012	Bindner et al.
D662451	June 2012	Schmalix et al.
D668598	October 2012	Hughes et al.
D694702	December 2013	Leconte et al.
D709024	July 2014	Shin
D710290	August 2014	Leconte et al.
D710293	August 2014	Fontaine et al.
D720681	January 2015	Bindner et al.
D726104	April 2015	Scheifele
D731405	June 2015	Fujita
D750010	February 2016	Kato
D753051	April 2016	Kato

Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.