Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Dixon; Max Harold (Kent, OH), Gramoll; Brandon Jeffrey (Grafton, WI), Strader; Ashley Amanda (Akron, OH)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/473,334
Filed:	November 21, 2013

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/588; D12/900
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/568-603,553,900-901 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D387715	December 1997	Miller et al.
D410420	June 1999	de Barsy
D426178	June 2000	Weber et al.
D464025	October 2002	Okano
D473513	April 2003	Welbes
D480045	September 2003	Durand et al.
D497875	November 2004	Le et al.
D528500	September 2006	Le et al.
D531572	November 2006	Schmalix et al.
D534858	January 2007	Le et al.
D554055	October 2007	Beauguitte et al.
D569334	May 2008	Maziarka et al.
D583308	December 2008	Ludwig et al.
D591224	April 2009	Ludwig et al.
D592590	May 2009	Janesh et al.
D599281	September 2009	Scheuren
D601085	September 2009	Janesh et al.
D601488	October 2009	Maus et al.
D615481	May 2010	Gommez
D616356	May 2010	Ohara
D626501	November 2010	Cazin-Bourguignon et al.
D627713	November 2010	Le et al.
D628955	December 2010	Toumni et al.
D637152	May 2011	Maus et al.
D639234	June 2011	Reim
D640185	June 2011	Scheuren et al.
D640969	July 2011	Scheuren et al.
D642974	August 2011	Koshio
D645810	September 2011	Le et al.
D647040	October 2011	Mathonet et al.
D648264	November 2011	Le et al.
D653199	January 2012	Scheuren et al.
D662457	June 2012	Krier et al.
D667365	September 2012	Dixon et al.
D667781	September 2012	Georges et al.
D686973	July 2013	Otani
D700132	February 2014	Wang et al.
D700885	March 2014	Le et al.
D702180	April 2014	Le et al.

Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.