Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Bortolet; Lionel Jean-Marie (Gorcy, FR), Le; Phuoc Thuan (Attert, BE), Scheuren; Daniel (Arlon, BE), Robert; Michel Pierre Charles (Sibret, BE), Knepper; Jean-Claude (Ingeldorf, LU), Rion; Vincent Dominique Claude (Sprimont, BE), Feider; Georges Gaston (Bettborn, LU), Houba; Raymond Marie Joseph Ghislain (Vaux-sur-sure, BE), Houchard; Stephane (Orgeo, BE), Micek; Jaroslaw (Ettelbruck, LU)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/466,022
Filed:	September 4, 2013

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/601
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/568-603,900-901,564-465 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D360859	August 1995	Attinello et al.
D383712	September 1997	Scheuren et al.
D387716	December 1997	Miller et al.
D388040	December 1997	de Barsy
D390513	February 1998	Guspodin et al.
D410420	June 1999	de Barsy
D415982	November 1999	Consolacion et al.
D423995	May 2000	Gillard et al.
D448328	September 2001	Dumigan et al.
D449022	October 2001	Cazin-Bourguignon et al.
D451455	December 2001	Helt
D452201	December 2001	Regallis et al.
D458580	June 2002	Young et al.
D458584	June 2002	Young et al.
D459296	June 2002	Umstot et al.
D465763	November 2002	Umstot et al.
D473843	April 2003	Le et al.
D478863	August 2003	Le et al.
D481353	October 2003	Oliver et al.
D497875	November 2004	Le et al.
D498208	November 2004	Cazin-Bourguignon et al.
D517468	March 2006	Le et al.
D528500	September 2006	Le et al.
D533498	December 2006	Scheuren et al.
D534858	January 2007	Le et al.
D541731	May 2007	Maziarka et al.
D554055	October 2007	Beauguitte et al.
D569334	May 2008	Maziarka et al.
D584217	January 2009	Scheuren et al.
D586727	February 2009	Campana
D586730	February 2009	Scheuren et al.
D601085	September 2009	Janesh et al.
D604228	November 2009	Le et al.
D604229	November 2009	Le et al.
D612325	March 2010	Haga
D619081	July 2010	Nicolas et al.
D626501	November 2010	Cazin-Bourguignon et al.
D627707	November 2010	Le et al.
D628955	December 2010	Toumni et al.
D631000	January 2011	Yonetsu
D631001	January 2011	Hughes et al.
D631428	January 2011	Yonetsu
D645810	September 2011	Le et al.
D647040	October 2011	Mathonet et al.
D648264	November 2011	Le et al.
D662463	June 2012	Youn
D673899	January 2013	Uphouse et al.
D674743	January 2013	Uphouse et al.

Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.