Tire

Dixon , et al. March 28, 2

Patent Grant D782404

U.S. patent number D782,404 [Application Number D/529,012] was granted by the patent office on 2017-03-28 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Max Harold Dixon, Robert John Hermann, Austin Gale Young.


United States Patent D782,404
Dixon ,   et al. March 28, 2017

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Dixon; Max Harold (Kent, OH), Hermann; Robert John (Cuyahoga Falls, OH), Young; Austin Gale (Wadsworth, OH)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/529,012
Filed: June 3, 2015

Current U.S. Class: D12/602
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/568-604,900

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D340891 November 1993 Patel
D384611 October 1997 Harden, Jr.
D386133 November 1997 Nakatsuji
D388369 December 1997 Harden, Jr.
D427552 July 2000 Young
D442897 May 2001 Cazin-Bourguignon et al.
D444740 July 2001 Le et al.
D457128 May 2002 Robert et al.
D457855 May 2002 Bawin
D472202 March 2003 Gillard
D517468 March 2006 Le et al.
D528500 September 2006 Le et al.
D537033 February 2007 Dumigan et al.
D586732 February 2009 Heinen
D591227 April 2009 Seibert et al.
D592590 May 2009 Janesh et al.
D598370 August 2009 Beha
D601085 September 2009 Janesh et al.
D604228 November 2009 Le et al.
D604229 November 2009 Le
D614121 April 2010 Janesh et al.
D641314 July 2011 Strader et al.
D647040 October 2011 Mathonet et al.
D667363 September 2012 Kudo
D674739 January 2013 Georges et al.
D686566 July 2013 Maus et al.
D702180 April 2014 Le et al.
D735642 August 2015 Miyazaki
Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Assistant Examiner: Voytek; John
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

The dark stippled surface shading represents the recessed portion of the tread grooves having a depth as best shown in FIG. 2.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed