Tire

Hermann , et al. July 28, 2

Patent Grant D735119

U.S. patent number D735,119 [Application Number D/462,277] was granted by the patent office on 2015-07-28 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Robert John Hermann, Joel Joseph Lazeration, Jeffrey Leon Sevart, Jonathan James Shondel, Pedro Yap.


United States Patent D735,119
Hermann ,   et al. July 28, 2015

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Hermann; Robert John (Cuyahoga Falls, OH), Yap; Pedro (Silver Lake, OH), Lazeration; Joel Joseph (Copley, OH), Sevart; Jeffrey Leon (Akron, OH), Shondel; Jonathan James (Massillon, OH)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/462,277
Filed: August 1, 2013

Current U.S. Class: D12/578
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/533-567 ;152/209.1-209.28,455,158,192

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D112993 January 1939 Hardeman
D340436 October 1993 Baus
D400479 November 1998 Baus
D412302 July 1999 Rayman et al.
D420630 February 2000 De Coninck et al.
D430834 September 2000 Allison
D431214 September 2000 Allison
D444106 June 2001 Allison et al.
D444432 July 2001 Warchol
D447447 September 2001 Guspodin et al.
D447987 September 2001 Allison
D450273 November 2001 Guspodin et al.
D453310 February 2002 Allison et al.
D453311 February 2002 Guspodin et al.
D455117 April 2002 Guspodin et al.
D455681 April 2002 Guspodin et al.
D456766 May 2002 Warchol et al.
D457486 May 2002 Guspodin et al.
D492643 July 2004 Robert
D549163 August 2007 Maus et al.
D593933 June 2009 Sueishi
D627709 November 2010 Harvey et al.
D642114 July 2011 Sugimoto et al.
D642509 August 2011 Curtis et al.
D648262 November 2011 Hermann et al.
D656085 March 2012 Maus et al.
D678831 March 2013 Hermann et al.
Primary Examiner: Kirschbaum; George D
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed