Tire

Davis , et al. May 24, 2

Patent Grant D952545

U.S. patent number D952,545 [Application Number D/704,148] was granted by the patent office on 2022-05-24 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Cyril Jean-Louis Bomble, Brian Rene Bourel, Mark Anthony Canankamp, Christopher Byron Davis, Nicholas William Fazio, Zachary William Juergens, Christopher John Lane, Mihir Singh Meetarbhan, Andrew John Norwood, Sebastien Penin, Ganesh Viswanathan.


United States Patent D952,545
Davis ,   et al. May 24, 2022

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Davis; Christopher Byron (North Canton, OH), Norwood; Andrew John (Ivanhoe, AU), Juergens; Zachary William (Canton, OH), Bomble; Cyril Jean-Louis (Arville, BE), Bourel; Brian Rene (Schieren, LU), Lane; Christopher John (Medina, OH), Canankamp; Mark Anthony (Wadsworth, OH), Meetarbhan; Mihir Singh (Blaschette, LU), Penin; Sebastien (Mertzig, LU), Viswanathan; Ganesh (Luxembourg, LU), Fazio; Nicholas William (Uniontown, OH)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/704,148
Filed: September 3, 2019

Current U.S. Class: D12/601
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/568-605,900

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D350095 August 1994 Anderson et al.
D368690 April 1996 Heinen et al.
D382521 August 1997 Consolacion et al.
D384619 October 1997 Attinello et al.
D387311 December 1997 Park et al.
D387716 December 1997 Miller et al.
D392922 March 1998 Heinen
D405740 February 1999 Heinen et al.
D413286 August 1999 Umstot et al.
D415982 November 1999 Consolacion et al.
D418459 January 2000 Graas et al.
D418785 January 2000 Lovell et al.
D432467 October 2000 Guspodin et al.
D446754 August 2001 Guspodin et al.
D453919 February 2002 Mast et al.
D469396 January 2003 Hutson et al.
D484457 December 2003 Kindig et al.
D500732 January 2005 Lo
D528069 September 2006 Maxwell et al.
D554056 October 2007 Allison et al.
D569334 May 2008 Maziarka et al.
D597474 August 2009 Yamakawa et al.
D600635 September 2009 Finnell et al.
D644592 September 2011 Grabo et al.
D647467 October 2011 Bonhomme et al.
D659075 May 2012 Harvey et al.
D668207 October 2012 Brown
D669421 October 2012 Stuckey et al.
D670237 November 2012 Maxwell et al.
D737757 September 2015 Oberlin et al.
D756905 May 2016 Sareen
D764389 August 2016 Thieman
D772792 November 2016 Kim
D776043 January 2017 Ding
D777651 January 2017 Gallego
D797656 September 2017 Umstot
D822588 July 2018 Skurich et al.
D828289 September 2018 Fox et al.
D838664 January 2019 Pribula et al.
D852125 June 2019 Davis et al.
D882502 April 2020 Hiser
D882506 April 2020 Maggelet
D883907 May 2020 Nyun
D904972 December 2020 Nyun
D932423 October 2021 Sui
2013/0153100 June 2013 Piffard

Other References

US. Appl. No. 29/662,333, filed Sep. 5, 2018, Fox, Goodyear. cited by applicant .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/669,258, filed Nov. 7, 2018, Roth, et al., Goodyear. cited by applicant .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/677,108, filed Jan. 17, 2019, Fox, et al, Goodyear. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Voytek; John A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N. Rickey; June E.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the left side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof taken along line 4-4 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim, that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and the broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.

The dashed broken lines indicating an enlargement portion of the design form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed