Semiconductor device
Taguchi , et al. November 2, 2
U.S. patent number D934,821 [Application Number D/720,895] was granted by the patent office on 2021-11-02 for semiconductor device. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nuvoton Technology Corporation Japan. The grantee listed for this patent is Nuvoton Technology Corporation Japan. Invention is credited to Toshikazu Imai, Ryosuke Okawa, Masahide Taguchi.
| United States Patent | D934,821 |
| Taguchi , et al. | November 2, 2021 |
Semiconductor device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a semiconductor device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Taguchi; Masahide (Kyoto, JP), Okawa; Ryosuke (Nara, JP), Imai; Toshikazu (Hyogo, JP) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Nuvoton Technology Corporation
Japan (Nagaokakyo, JP) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/720,895 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | January 16, 2020 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jul 24, 2019 [JP] | 2019-016521 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D13/182 |
| Current International Class: | 1303 |
| Field of Search: | ;D13/182 ;D21/391 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 273559 | March 1883 | Lockwood |
| 295023 | March 1884 | Law |
| 729489 | May 1903 | Cigol |
| 1998526 | April 1935 | Schubert |
| D318461 | July 1991 | Hasegawa |
| D319045 | August 1991 | Hasegawa |
| D319629 | September 1991 | Hasegawa |
| D319814 | September 1991 | Hasegawa |
| 5370398 | December 1994 | Nguyen |
| 5757082 | May 1998 | Shibata |
| 5994772 | November 1999 | Shin |
| D427159 | June 2000 | Oba |
| 6307269 | October 2001 | Akiyama |
| D456367 | April 2002 | Matteson |
| D457146 | May 2002 | Yamamoto |
| D466093 | November 2002 | Ebihara |
| D471167 | March 2003 | Ebihara |
| D487430 | March 2004 | Asaka |
| 6753482 | June 2004 | Schoenfeld |
| 6836002 | December 2004 | Chikawa |
| D504874 | May 2005 | Celaya |
| D510728 | October 2005 | Celaya |
| D540272 | April 2007 | Higashibata |
| D598380 | August 2009 | Kuriki |
| D648290 | November 2011 | Mori |
| D687898 | August 2013 | Lupkas |
| D691101 | October 2013 | Ishizawa |
| 8618540 | December 2013 | Jo |
| D721047 | January 2015 | Vinciarelli |
| D752000 | March 2016 | Vinciarelli |
| D754083 | April 2016 | Vinciarelli |
| D768115 | October 2016 | Kazanchian |
| D775093 | December 2016 | Vinciarelli |
| D789456 | June 2017 | Frost |
| D813182 | March 2018 | Imai et al. |
| D864882 | October 2019 | Sakamoto |
| D864883 | October 2019 | Sakamoto |
| D865690 | November 2019 | Sakamoto |
| D904325 | December 2020 | Omichi |
| D1581768 | Jul 2017 | JP | |||
| D1588125 | Oct 2017 | JP | |||
| D1588481 | Oct 2017 | JP | |||
| D1632160 | May 2019 | JP | |||
| D1632597 | May 2019 | JP | |||
| D1640664 | Sep 2019 | JP | |||
| D1641048 | Sep 2019 | JP | |||
| D1641049 | Sep 2019 | JP | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Crowell & Moring LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a semiconductor device showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 