Tire tread

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the tire tread of our design;

FIG. 2 front elevation view of the tire tread of our design;

FIG. 3 is a side elevation view of the tire tread of our design;

FIG. 4 is a side elevation view of the tire tread of our design, taken from the opposite side of that shown in FIG. 3; and,

FIG. 5 is an enlarged, partial view of the tire tread of FIG. 1, as indicated by the break lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines defining the sidewall and inner bead depict environmental subject matter that forms no part of the claimed design. The dash-dot-dot-dash line defines the peripheral boundary between the claimed tire tread and the unclaimed sidewall. The tread pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tire.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire tread, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Di-Mauro; Pascal (Clermont-Ferrand, FR), Bacher; Guillaume (Clermont-Ferrand, FR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN Michelin Recherche et Technique S.A. Clermont-Ferrand Granges-Paccot N/A N/A FR CH
Assignee:	COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN (FR)
Appl. No.:	D/584,770
Filed:	November 17, 2016

---

Foreign Application Priority Data

---

May 18, 2016 [FR]			2016-2619

Current U.S. Class:	D12/588; D12/594
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/579,586,587,588,589,590,594,600,601

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D295733	May 1988	Adam
4832099	May 1989	Matsumoto
D315124	March 1991	Baus
D316239	April 1991	Tsuda et al.
D340898	November 1993	Kuroda
D385235	October 1997	Young
D388370	December 1997	Young et al.
D390510	February 1998	Stone et al.
D397647	September 1998	Young
D397648	September 1998	Allen et al.
D402240	December 1998	Hubbell, Jr.
D429667	August 2000	Fierro et al.
D449024	October 2001	Lovell et al.
D458584	June 2002	Young
D464614	October 2002	Irimiya
D472202	March 2003	Gillard
D484092	December 2003	Okamoto
D488123	April 2004	Ooyama
D531115	October 2006	Ikeda
D569334	May 2008	Maziarka
D584217	January 2009	Scheuren
D591224	April 2009	Ludwig et al.
D609174	February 2010	Cai
D610076	February 2010	Tobino
D615922	May 2010	Takano
D616356	May 2010	Ohara
D635915	April 2011	Hamada
D637148	May 2011	Tamura
D637150	May 2011	Koshio
D642974	August 2011	Koshio
D647036	October 2011	Yamaguchi
D647040	October 2011	Mathonet et al.
D647468	October 2011	Weaver et al.
D647470	October 2011	Bachtel
D660223	May 2012	Dixon
D668208	October 2012	Brown et al.
D674741	January 2013	Mathonet et al.
D675981	February 2013	Kuwahara
D686145	July 2013	Godin et al.
D686973	July 2013	Otani
D717237	November 2014	Bardin et al.
D718223	November 2014	Gommez
D719907	December 2014	Ohara
D722950	February 2015	Compte et al.
D724007	March 2015	Houria Belarbi et al.
D727251	April 2015	Zhu
D730273	May 2015	Schimmoeller
D735646	August 2015	Hair, Jr.
D739343	September 2015	Gommez
9120354	September 2015	Maehara
D745450	December 2015	Bardin et al.
D746219	December 2015	Bardin et al.
D758287	June 2016	Zivkovic et al.
D758289	June 2016	Cagneaux et al.
D759582	June 2016	Nobunaga
D761194	July 2016	Dixon
D767476	September 2016	Kristen
D773983	December 2016	Inoue
D775584	January 2017	Matsuda
D779417	February 2017	De Giacco
D780675	March 2017	Di-Mauro
D780681	March 2017	Krier
D784915	April 2017	Koog
D785555	May 2017	Bacher
D787436	May 2017	Dixon
D791688	July 2017	Trowbridge
2012/0216931	August 2012	Shiono
2016/0082779	March 2016	Maehara
2016/0193883	July 2016	Kitani
2017/0106701	April 2017	Ito
2017/0106702	April 2017	Ito
2017/0253088	September 2017	Maehara

Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dickinson Wright PLLC