Tire

Mathonet , et al. May 17, 2

Patent Grant D756293

U.S. patent number D756,293 [Application Number D/506,061] was granted by the patent office on 2016-05-17 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Vincent Benoit Mathonet, Peter Johann Cornelius Maus, Eric Michel Paul Muller, Didier Winkin.


United States Patent D756,293
Mathonet ,   et al. May 17, 2016

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Mathonet; Vincent Benoit (Harze, BE), Maus; Peter Johann Cornelius (Bullingen, BE), Muller; Eric Michel Paul (Contz-les-Bains, FR), Winkin; Didier (Bastogne, BE)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/506,061
Filed: October 13, 2014

Current U.S. Class: D12/566
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/533-567 ;152/209.1,209.18,209.28

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
4299264 November 1981 Williams
D284364 June 1986 Nakanishi
D287236 December 1986 Yonekura
D302412 July 1989 Goergen et al.
D320772 October 1991 Hasegawa
D322237 December 1991 Nakatani
D350103 August 1994 Graas
D360175 July 1995 Eromaki
D370196 May 1996 Graas et al.
D385519 October 1997 de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D390512 February 1998 Eromaki
D395265 June 1998 Graas
D396675 August 1998 Johenning
D397066 August 1998 Grosskopf
D399798 October 1998 Grosskopf et al.
D400480 November 1998 Johenning
D400832 November 1998 Dixon et al.
D441696 May 2001 Fierro et al.
RE37306 August 2001 Shirai
D455998 April 2002 Heinen et al.
D471151 March 2003 Otsuji
D471509 March 2003 Graas
D512682 December 2005 Krenz et al.
D549157 August 2007 Maus et al.
D577657 September 2008 Maus et al.
D589874 April 2009 Fontaine et al.
D596559 July 2009 Scheuren
D599731 September 2009 Scheuren
D656085 March 2012 Maus et al.
Primary Examiner: Matharu; Manpreet
Assistant Examiner: Soroush; Aula
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the left side being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is a mirror image thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed