U.S. patent number D882,494 [Application Number D/673,784] was granted by the patent office on 2020-04-28 for tire.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Brian Rene Bourel, Sebastien Willy Fontaine, Francois Dominique Etienne Humbert, Armand Rene Gabriel Leconte, Marc Francois Pierre Pautard, Benjamin Philipot.
United States Patent |
D882,494 |
Philipot , et al. |
April 28, 2020 |
Tire
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental Design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: |
Philipot; Benjamin (Hettange
Grande, FR), Fontaine; Sebastien Willy (Vichten,
LU), Bourel; Brian Rene (Schieren, LU),
Pautard; Marc Francois Pierre (Buschdorf, LU),
Leconte; Armand Rene Gabriel (Insenborn, LU),
Humbert; Francois Dominique Etienne (Warken, LU) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company |
Akron |
OH |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company (Akron, OH)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/673,784 |
Filed: |
December 18, 2018 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D12/523 |
Current International
Class: |
1215 |
Field of
Search: |
;D12/500-532,604 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
US. Appl. No. 29/645,118, filed Apr. 24, 2018, Goodyear. cited by
applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Stout; Michael C
Assistant Examiner: Voytek; John A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.
Description
FIG. 1 is a right side perspective view of a tire showing our new
design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly
throughout the circumference of the tread;
FIG. 2 is a left side perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view
thereof;
FIG. 7 is a right side perspective view of a second embodiment of a
tire showing our new design, it being understood that the interior
of the tire forms no part of the claim and that the pattern repeats
uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;
FIG. 8 is a left side perspective view of a second embodiment, it
being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the
claim; and,
FIG. 9 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being
understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be
substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 6, with the exception
of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.
In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer
edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and
the broken lines on the surface in the drawings show portions of
the article that form no part of the claim.
* * * * *