Tire

de Briey-Terlinden , et al. October 30, 2

Patent Grant D832195

U.S. patent number D832,195 [Application Number D/608,881] was granted by the patent office on 2018-10-30 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Pascale de Briey-Terlinden, Jerome Marcel Germain Delu, Stephane Jose Geelen.


United States Patent D832,195
de Briey-Terlinden ,   et al. October 30, 2018

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: de Briey-Terlinden; Pascale (Attert, BE), Geelen; Stephane Jose (Redange sur Attert, LU), Delu; Jerome Marcel Germain (Bridel, LU)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Akron

OH

US
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/608,881
Filed: June 27, 2017

Current U.S. Class: D12/564
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/563,564,565,566,567

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D361966 September 1995 Graas et al.
D362420 September 1995 Heinen et al.
D379449 May 1997 Graas et al.
D379787 June 1997 Maxwell et al.
D429194 August 2000 Heinen et al.
D429478 August 2000 Heinen et al.
D441328 May 2001 Heinen et al.
D450032 November 2001 Heinen
D451068 November 2001 Heinen et al.
D452198 December 2001 Heinen et al.
D455116 April 2002 Graas et al.
D504106 April 2005 de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D504387 April 2005 Welbes et al.
D504866 May 2005 Collette et al.
D505112 May 2005 Heinen et al.
D533131 December 2006 Fontaine et al.
D548677 August 2007 Welbes et al.
D548679 August 2007 de Briey-Terlinden
D556670 December 2007 Fontaine et al.
D579861 November 2008 Haas et al.
D589874 April 2009 Fontaine et al.
D591221 April 2009 Fontaine
D592588 May 2009 Heinen et al.
D595639 July 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D595640 July 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D597475 August 2009 Heinen et al.
D597476 August 2009 de Briey-Terlinden
D601946 October 2009 Fontaine et al.
D610964 March 2010 Dixon et al.
D622657 August 2010 Leocadio et al.
D640184 June 2011 de Briey-Terlinden
D640966 July 2011 Fontaine et al.
D641305 July 2011 de Briey-Terlinden
D662453 June 2012 Takei
D662454 June 2012 Fontaine et al.
D670235 November 2012 de Briey-Terlinden
D684922 June 2013 Scheuren
D702625 April 2014 Leconte et al.
D702626 April 2014 de Briey-Terlinden
D718224 November 2014 Guichon
D720685 January 2015 Fontaine et al.
D721639 January 2015 Caron et al.
D722554 February 2015 Knispel et al.
D722555 February 2015 Knispel et al.
D723453 March 2015 Knispel et al.
D733639 July 2015 Fontaine et al.
D746218 December 2015 Raatikainen et al.
D754058 April 2016 Caron et al.
D756293 May 2016 Mathonet
D756896 May 2016 Leconte et al.
D773978 December 2016 Higashiura
D777091 January 2017 de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D780672 March 2017 Yoon
D786181 May 2017 Caron et al.
D810668 February 2018 Cavro
D812548 March 2018 Raatikainen
D816591 May 2018 Kossi
9969223 May 2018 Higashiura
D819551 June 2018 Uchida
Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the left side elevational view being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim, that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and the broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed