U.S. patent number D682,190 [Application Number D/436,447] was granted by the patent office on 2013-05-14 for tire.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The grantee listed for this patent is Max Harold Dixon, Shannon Joseph Hughes, Dale Edward Umstot, Hiram William Uphouse. Invention is credited to Max Harold Dixon, Shannon Joseph Hughes, Dale Edward Umstot, Hiram William Uphouse.
United States Patent |
D682,190 |
Uphouse , et al. |
May 14, 2013 |
Tire
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: |
Uphouse; Hiram William
(Uniontown, OH), Dixon; Max Harold (Kent, OH), Umstot;
Dale Edward (Atwater, OH), Hughes; Shannon Joseph
(Rootstown, OH) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Uphouse; Hiram William
Dixon; Max Harold
Umstot; Dale Edward
Hughes; Shannon Joseph |
Uniontown
Kent
Atwater
Rootstown |
OH
OH
OH
OH |
US
US
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company (Akron, OH)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/436,447 |
Filed: |
November 6, 2012 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D12/600 |
Current International
Class: |
1215 |
Field of
Search: |
;D12/568-603,900-901
;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it
being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the
circumference of the tread;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side
elevational view being identical thereto;
FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view
thereof;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire
showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern
repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and
that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,
FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being
understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be
substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception
of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.
In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner
bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the
sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter
and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *