Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing my new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the left side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof taken along line 4-4 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing my new design, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim, that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in the claim.

In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and the broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.

The dashed broken lines indicating an enlargement portion of the design form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental Design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Pribula; David Michael (Alliance, OH)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/706,666
Filed:	September 23, 2019

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/584
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/568-604,900

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D380425	July 1997	Brown et al.
D387311	December 1997	Park et al.
D405736	February 1999	Brightwell et al.
D413844	September 1999	Graas
D415984	November 1999	Allison
D444430	July 2001	Welbes et al.
D446482	August 2001	Fantanzo et al.
D482323	November 2003	Corbin et al.
D548680	August 2007	Heinen
D591223	April 2009	Missik-Gaffney et al.
D635911	April 2011	Sieber et al.
D641685	July 2011	Youn
D646625	October 2011	Youn
D647033	October 2011	Murata et al.
D665335	August 2012	Baumard et al.
D667363	September 2012	Judo
D668600	October 2012	Pingenat et al.
D686567	July 2013	Fu
D700884	March 2014	Herbeuval et al.
D709433	July 2014	Inoue
D730270	May 2015	Krier et al.
D738816	September 2015	Kato
D738817	September 2015	Kato
D761726	July 2016	Umstot et al.
D768562	October 2016	Kato
D771554	November 2016	Garcia et al.
D771555	November 2016	Neary et al.
D783514	April 2017	Fontaine
D784914	April 2017	Fontaine et al.
D795165	August 2017	Philipot et al.
D803770	November 2017	Hayashi
D817857	May 2018	Meetarbhan
D822588	July 2018	Skurich et al.
D823783	July 2018	Garcia et al.
D853942	July 2019	Haas
D853947	July 2019	Pribula
D886716	June 2020	Pribula
D886717	June 2020	Pribula
2019/0366778	December 2019	Kitora

Other References

US. Appl. No. 29/649,956, filed Jun. 4, 2018, Roberts, et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/660,287, filed Aug. 20, 2018, Pribula. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/671,346, filed Nov. 27, 2018, Pribula. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Voytek; John A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N. Rickey; Jane E.