Tire

Missik-Gaffney , et al. April 28, 2

Patent Grant D591223

U.S. patent number D591,223 [Application Number D/317,901] was granted by the patent office on 2009-04-28 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Randall Raymond Brayer, Shannon Joseph Hughes, Lisa Marie Missik-Gaffney, Efimia Ellen Rohweder, Michael Stefan Skurich.


United States Patent D591,223
Missik-Gaffney ,   et al. April 28, 2009

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Missik-Gaffney; Lisa Marie (North Jackson, OH), Skurich; Michael Stefan (Canton, OH), Hughes; Shannon Joseph (Rootstown, OH), Brayer; Randall Raymond (North Canton, OH), Rohweder; Efimia Ellen (Uniontown, OH)
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/317,901
Filed: May 9, 2008

Current U.S. Class: D12/584
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/582-591,900-901,600,568 ;152/209.1,209.8-209.18,209.25-209.28

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D290826 July 1987 Nakaseko
D309883 August 1990 Barnett
D344053 February 1994 Attinello et al.
D350507 September 1994 Helluin
D368057 March 1996 Shirai et al.
D379335 May 1997 Aikawa et al.
D388374 December 1997 Lim et al.
D400831 November 1998 Blankenship et al.
D402940 December 1998 McKisson et al.
D419928 February 2000 Blankenship
D422246 April 2000 Fierro et al.
D445071 July 2001 Brightwell et al.
D470101 February 2003 Heinen
D473513 April 2003 Welbes
D479188 September 2003 Hutz et al.
D480352 October 2003 Dixon et al.
D481352 October 2003 Hutz et al.
D482323 November 2003 Corbin et al.
D483006 December 2003 Brayer et al.
D490045 May 2004 Delu et al.
D503145 March 2005 Labbe et al.
D510064 September 2005 Hildebrand
D524232 July 2006 Heinen et al.
D531113 October 2006 Dixon et al.
D534485 January 2007 Nakamura
D535611 January 2007 Sundkvist et al.
D547717 July 2007 Yamane et al.
D560598 January 2008 Heinen et al.
D560600 January 2008 Dixon et al.
Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side perspective view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines defining the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the claimed tire tread and the unclaimed sidewall depict environmental subject matter that forms no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed