Unmanned aerial vehicle

Woodworth , et al.

Patent Grant D852092

U.S. patent number D852,092 [Application Number D/621,957] was granted by the patent office on 2019-06-25 for unmanned aerial vehicle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Wing Aviation LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is X Development LLC. Invention is credited to Stephen Benson, Jesse Blake, Kyle Liske, Andre Prager, Nicolas Renold, Adem Rudin, James Schmalzried, Clark Sopper, Evan Twyford, Adam Woodworth.


United States Patent D852,092
Woodworth ,   et al. June 25, 2019

Unmanned aerial vehicle

Claims

CLAIM We claim the ornamental design of an unmanned aerial vehicle, as shown and described.
Inventors: Woodworth; Adam (San Jose, CA), Rudin; Adem (Mountain View, CA), Benson; Stephen (San Carlos, CA), Schmalzried; James (San Jose, CA), Liske; Kyle (San Francisco, CA), Blake; Jesse (Sunnyvale, CA), Prager; Andre (Sunnyvale, CA), Renold; Nicolas (Mountain View, CA), Twyford; Evan (Mountain View, CA), Sopper; Clark (Redwood City, CA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

X Development LLC

Mountain View

CA

US
Assignee: Wing Aviation LLC (Mountain View, CA)
Appl. No.: D/621,957
Filed: October 12, 2017

Current U.S. Class: D12/16.1
Current International Class: 1207
Field of Search: ;D12/16.1,319-345 ;D21/436,438,441,442,443,444,447,448,449,450,451,452,454

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D91444 January 1934 Shelton
D119714 March 1940 Hibbard et al.
D145898 November 1946 Kartveli
D148673 February 1948 Boyes
D163722 June 1951 Vinje
D172969 September 1954 Johnson et al.
2752114 June 1956 Calvy
3018987 January 1962 Multhopp
3059876 October 1962 Platt
D203720 February 1966 Jarchow
D239522 April 1976 Wheatley
D240909 August 1976 Whitener
D246298 November 1977 Hansen
D269669 July 1983 Hancock
D269967 August 1983 Dmitrowsky
4746082 May 1988 Syms
D301867 June 1989 Street
D311719 October 1990 Haga
5145129 September 1992 Gebhard
D371105 June 1996 Graham
D396842 August 1998 Jones
5979824 November 1999 Gagliano
D461159 August 2002 Miralles
D466858 December 2002 Carroll
D496074 September 2004 Darack
D500729 January 2005 Wilding
D500981 January 2005 Wilding
6969026 November 2005 Kayama
D543248 May 2007 Winston
D573939 July 2008 Las Heras
D616805 June 2010 Zha
D678169 March 2013 Kennelly
D710782 August 2014 Cummings
D734402 July 2015 Reznik
D736140 August 2015 Moller
9120560 September 2015 Armer
D743868 November 2015 Cummings
D800843 October 2017 Sartorius
D808328 January 2018 Ivans
D810621 February 2018 Sadek
9884682 February 2018 Stuckl
D813143 March 2018 Belik
D816547 May 2018 Cui
D816583 May 2018 Dutertre
10000285 June 2018 Shannon
D822579 July 2018 Lienhard
D824321 July 2018 Ivans
10029787 July 2018 Lesser
10035623 July 2018 Prager
D824804 August 2018 Tian
D825380 August 2018 Tompkin
D825381 August 2018 Meugnier
D825669 August 2018 Tompkin
D832141 October 2018 Ferner
D832154 October 2018 Tian
10131428 November 2018 Sopper
D843889 March 2019 Merrill
2013/0020429 January 2013 Kroo
2013/0206921 August 2013 Paduano
2014/0158815 June 2014 Renteria
2014/0339372 November 2014 Dekel
2017/0113778 April 2017 Liu
2017/0137122 May 2017 Kooiman
2017/0300065 October 2017 Douglas
2018/0057159 March 2018 Ivans
2018/0072398 March 2018 Sartorius
2018/0079503 March 2018 Ivans
2018/0086458 March 2018 Sartorius
2018/0148160 May 2018 Gonzalez
2018/0251226 September 2018 Fenny
2018/0273168 September 2018 Page

Other References

Google's Project Wing tests drone food delivery in Australia by George Suresh . dated Oct. 23, 2017. found online [Dec. 14, 2018] https://www.droneblog.com/2017/10/23/googles-project-wing-tests-drone-foo- d-delivery-in-australia/. cited by examiner .
"Drone trial takes flight", Canberra Times, Jul. 16, 2017, 2 pages. cited by applicant .
"Autonomous drone trial for Googong", Canberra Times, Jul. 16, 2017, 1 page. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Cash; Marissa J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC

Description



FIG. 1 is a top left perspective view of an unmanned aerial vehicle;

FIG. 2 is a bottom right perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a right side elevation view thereof; and,

FIG. 8 is a left side elevation view thereof.

The broken lines immediately adjacent the claimed areas represent the bounds of the claimed design while all other broken lines are directed to portions of the unmanned aerial vehicle that form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *

References

Patent Diagrams and Documents

D00000


D00001


D00002


D00003


D00004


D00005


D00006


XML


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed