Drone
Cui May 1, 2
U.S. patent number D816,547 [Application Number D/606,490] was granted by the patent office on 2018-05-01 for drone. This patent grant is currently assigned to Beijing Jingdong Century Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing JingDong ShangKe Information Technology Co., Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is Beijing Jingdong Century Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing JingDong ShangKe Information Technology Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Yanjun Cui.
| United States Patent | D816,547 |
| Cui | May 1, 2018 |
Drone
Claims
CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for a drone, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cui; Yanjun (Beijing, CN) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Beijing JingDong ShangKe
Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, CN) Beijing Jingdong Century Trading Co., Ltd. (Beijing, CN) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/606,490 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | June 5, 2017 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Dec 9, 2016 [CN] | 2016 3 0604513 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/16.1 |
| Current International Class: | 1207 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/16.1,319,325,326,327,328,329-345 ;D21/436,441,442,443,444,445-453 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D134426 | November 1942 | McDonnell |
| D139438 | November 1944 | Hughes |
| D140113 | January 1945 | Biasell |
| D180890 | September 1957 | Boyd |
| D190004 | March 1961 | Doak |
| D239274 | March 1976 | Snyder |
| D277976 | March 1985 | Holloway |
| D292393 | October 1987 | Rutan |
| D326255 | May 1992 | Graham |
| D454109 | March 2002 | Moshier |
| D461159 | August 2002 | Miralles |
| 6886776 | May 2005 | Wagner |
| D543248 | May 2007 | Winston |
| D616804 | June 2010 | Manley |
| D634257 | March 2011 | Alexander |
| D642968 | August 2011 | Zhao |
| D649506 | November 2011 | Morelli |
| D651156 | December 2011 | Gundlach |
| D665331 | August 2012 | Sands |
| D691547 | October 2013 | Hall |
| D708563 | July 2014 | Colten |
| 9061763 | June 2015 | Christensen |
| 9120560 | September 2015 | Armer |
| D741247 | October 2015 | Brody |
| D743868 | November 2015 | Cummings |
| 9475579 | October 2016 | Fredericks |
| 9505484 | November 2016 | Al-Sabah |
| 9682774 | June 2017 | Paduano |
| D799402 | October 2017 | Cummings |
| 2007/0018035 | January 2007 | Saiz |
| 2012/0012692 | January 2012 | Kroo |
| 2012/0043413 | February 2012 | Smith |
| 2014/0339372 | November 2014 | Dekel |
| 2015/0246727 | September 2015 | Masticola |
| 2016/0144954 | May 2016 | Daigle |
| 2016/0337562 | November 2016 | Kang |
| 2016/0362173 | December 2016 | Marion |
| 2017/0029099 | February 2017 | Chen |
| 2017/0133771 | May 2017 | Xiao |
| 2017/0144756 | May 2017 | Rastgaar Aagaah |
| 2017/0158320 | June 2017 | Bosch |
Assistant Examiner: Cash; Marissa J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a drone showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom view thereof.
The broken lines illustrate environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 