Tire

Rooney , et al. November 27, 2

Patent Grant D671486

U.S. patent number D671,486 [Application Number D/427,338] was granted by the patent office on 2012-11-27 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to James Benedict Kubeck, Timothy Michael Rooney.


United States Patent D671,486
Rooney ,   et al. November 27, 2012

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Rooney; Timothy Michael (Munroe Falls, OH), Kubeck; James Benedict (Cuyahoga Falls, OH)
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/427,338
Filed: July 17, 2012

Current U.S. Class: D12/579
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/568-603,536,542-544,900-901 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D337978 August 1993 Himuro et al.
D413287 August 1999 Brown et al.
D413288 August 1999 Brown et al.
D414727 October 1999 Brown et al.
D430832 September 2000 Edwards
D444106 June 2001 Allison et al.
D450273 November 2001 Guspodin et al.
D453311 February 2002 Guspodin et al.
D455681 April 2002 Guspodin et al.
D456344 April 2002 Rooney
D457486 May 2002 Guspodin et al.
D487055 February 2004 Rooney et al.
D487056 February 2004 Rooney et al.
D487057 February 2004 Rooney et al.
D496328 September 2004 Shondel et al.
D511738 November 2005 Maxwell
D556124 November 2007 Thum et al.
D556672 December 2007 Umstot et al.
D556673 December 2007 Missik-Gaffney et al.
D556674 December 2007 Missik-Gaffney et al.
D577663 September 2008 Klein
D578953 October 2008 Umstot et al.
D578954 October 2008 Harvey et al.
D578957 October 2008 Bonko et al.
D582836 December 2008 Harvey et al.
D583301 December 2008 Ohigashi
D591219 April 2009 Ohigahi et al.
D601487 October 2009 Ebel et al.
D605105 December 2009 Klein
D627709 November 2010 Harvey et al.
D642509 August 2011 Curtis et al.
D653195 January 2012 Sareen
D654012 February 2012 Lo
D656086 March 2012 Herbeuval et al.
Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is identical thereto; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed