Strawberry plant variety named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` Patent Grant Carrillo Mendoza , et al. [Driscoll's, Inc.]

Strawberry plant variety named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`

Carrillo Mendoza , et al.

Patent Grant PP31527

U.S. patent number PP31,527 [Application Number 15/998,170] was granted by the patent office on 2020-03-10 for strawberry plant variety named `drisstrawsixtytwo`. This patent grant is currently assigned to Driscoll's, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Driscoll's, Inc.. Invention is credited to Omar Carrillo Mendoza, Michael D. Ferguson, Luis Miguel Rodriguez, Philip J. Stewart.

United States Patent	PP31,527
Carrillo Mendoza , et al.	March 10, 2020

Strawberry plant variety named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`

Abstract

A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`, particularly characterized by its yield potential, fruit size and flavor, and shelf-life, is disclosed.

Inventors:

Carrillo Mendoza; Omar (La Calera, MX), Rodriguez; Luis Miguel (Watsonville, CA), Ferguson; Michael D. (Moorpark, CA), Stewart; Philip J. (Watsonville, CA)

Applicant:

Name	City	State	Country	Type
Driscoll's, Inc.	Watsonville	CA	US

Assignee:

Driscoll's, Inc. (Watsonville, CA)

Family ID:

69138079

Appl. No.:

15/998,170

Filed:

July 12, 2018

Prior Publication Data


	Document Identifier	Publication Date
	US 20200022294 P1	Jan 16, 2020

Current U.S. Class:	PLT/208
Current CPC Class:	A01H 6/74 (20180501); A01H 6/7409 (20180501)
Current International Class:	A01H 5/08 (20180101); A01H 6/74 (20180101)
Field of Search:	;PLT/208,209

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


PP1745	August 1958	Lang
PP3981	November 1976	Bringhurst et al.
PP4487	November 1979	Bringhurst et al.
PP4538	May 1980	Bringhurst et al.
PP5262	July 1984	Voth et al.
PP5265	July 1984	Voth et al.
PP5266	July 1984	Bringhurst et al.
PP5300	October 1984	Johnson Jr.
PP5480	May 1985	Nakagawa
PP5840	December 1986	Johnson, Jr. et al.
PP6191	May 1988	Johnson, Jr. et al.
PP6231	July 1988	Johnson, Jr. et al.
PP6578	January 1989	Voth et al.
PP6579	January 1989	Bringhurst et al.
PP7024	September 1989	Johnson, Jr. et al.
PP7172	February 1990	Voth et al.
PP7522	May 1991	Johnson, Jr. et al.
PP7614	August 1991	Bringhurst et al.
PP7615	August 1991	Bringhurst et al.
PP8086	January 1993	Nelson et al.
PP8205	April 1993	Nelson et al.
PP8649	March 1994	Sjulin et al.
PP8661	March 1994	Bringhurst et al.
PP8708	May 1994	Voth et al.
PP8745	May 1994	Sjulin et al.
PP9130	May 1995	Sjulin et al.
PP9909	June 1997	Ackerman et al.
PP10221	February 1998	Sjulin et al.
PP10534	August 1998	Sjulin et al.
PP10642	October 1998	Amorao et al.
PP11035	August 1999	Mowrey et al.
PP11277	March 2000	Gilford et al.
PP11279	March 2000	Gilford et al.
PP11522	September 2000	Amorao et al.
PP11548	October 2000	Amorao et al.
PP11554	October 2000	Sjulin et al.
PP11639	November 2000	Mowrey et al.
PP12186	November 2001	Gilford et al.
PP12436	March 2002	Amorao et al.
PP12577	April 2002	Amorao et al.
PP12817	July 2002	Gilford et al.
PP12889	August 2002	Lamb et al.
PP12899	September 2002	Mowrey et al.
PP13386	December 2002	Mowrey et al.
PP13469	January 2003	Larson et al.
PP14005	July 2003	Amorao et al.
PP14062	August 2003	Amorao et al.
PP14109	August 2003	Gilford et al.
PP14771	May 2004	Amorao et al.
PP15145	September 2004	Mowrey et al.
PP15308	November 2004	Sjulin et al.
PP15375	November 2004	Mowrey et al.
PP15435	December 2004	Sjulin et al.
PP15596	March 2005	Amorao et al.
PP15731	April 2005	Amorao et al.
PP15752	May 2005	Gilford et al.
PP16070	October 2005	Gilford et al.
PP16238	February 2006	Amorao et al.
PP16241	February 2006	Mowrey et al.
PP16298	February 2006	Gilford et al.
PP16299	February 2006	Gilford et al.
PP16475	April 2006	Gilford et al.
PP16558	May 2006	Lopez
PP18000	September 2007	Meulenbroek
PP18040	September 2007	Mowrey et al.
PP18041	September 2007	Gilford
PP18458	January 2008	Ferguson et al.
PP18575	March 2008	Amorao et al.
PP18878	June 2008	Mowrey et al.
PP19240	September 2008	Gilford et al.
PP19673	February 2009	Ferguson et al.
PP19767	February 2009	Shaw et al.
PP20248	September 2009	Rogers et al.
PP20701	February 2010	Gilford et al.
PP20731	February 2010	Mowrey et al.
PP20733	February 2010	Mowrey et al.
PP20735	February 2010	Ferguson
PP20775	February 2010	Mowrey et al.
PP20922	April 2010	Gilford et al.
PP21538	November 2010	Gilford et al.
PP21559	December 2010	Ferguson et al.
PP21762	March 2011	Stewart et al.
PP22040	July 2011	Stewart et al.
PP22218	November 2011	Ferguson
PP22247	November 2011	Ferguson
PP23107	October 2012	Ferguson et al.
PP23148	October 2012	Gilford et al.
PP23377	February 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP23378	February 2013	Pullen et al.
PP23382	February 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP23383	February 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP23400	February 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP23401	February 2013	Pullen et al.
PP23459	March 2013	Stewart et al.
PP23506	April 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP23517	April 2013	Ferguson et al.
PP24096	December 2013	Fear et al.
PP24317	March 2014	Ferguson et al.
PP24333	March 2014	Vitten et al.
PP24395	April 2014	Vitten et al.
PP24533	June 2014	Ferguson et al.
PP24745	August 2014	Vitten et al.
PP25408	April 2015	Vitten et al.
PP25437	April 2015	Vitten et al.
PP25698	July 2015	Ferguson et al.
PP25699	July 2015	Stewart et al.
PP25747	July 2015	Kibbe et al.
PP25866	September 2015	Ferguson et al.
PP26800	June 2016	Stewart et al.
PP26801	June 2016	Stewart et al.
PP26802	June 2016	Rodriguez Alcazar et al.
PP27442	December 2016	Kibbe et al.
PP27645	February 2017	Vitten et al.
PP27682	February 2017	Kibbe et al.
PP27711	February 2017	Vitten et al.
PP27813	March 2017	Ferguson et al.
PP29289	May 2018	Vitten et al.
2003/0079263	April 2003	Gilford et al.
2013/0276182	October 2013	Fear et al.

Other References

Fear et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,014, filed Jun. 11, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyEight`". cited by applicant .
Ferguson et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,546, filed Jun. 26, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftySix`". cited by applicant .
Kibbe et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,542, filed Jun. 26, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyTwo`". cited by applicant .
Kibbe et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,545, filed Jun. 26, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyOne`". cited by applicant .
Mendoza, et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,020, filed Jun. 12, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawSixtyOne`". cited by applicant .
Mendoza, et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,169, filed Jul. 12, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawSixtyThree`". cited by applicant .
Pakozdi et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,015, filed Jun. 11, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyNine`". cited by applicant .
Pakozdi et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,028, filed Jun. 14, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawSixtyFive`". cited by applicant .
Stewart et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl.. No. 15/731,415, filed Jun. 6, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyThree`". cited by applicant .
Stewart et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,421, filed Jun. 6, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftySeven`". cited by applicant .
Stewart et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,031, filed Jun. 14, 2018, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawSixtyFour`". cited by applicant .
Vitten et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,559, filed Jun. 27, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyFour`". cited by applicant .
Vitten et al., Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/731,560, filed Jun. 27, 2017, titled "Strawberry Plant Variety Named `DrisStrawFiftyFive`". cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Bell; Kent L
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP

Claims

We claim:

1. A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` as shown and described herein.

Description

Latin name: Botanical classification: Fragaria x ananassa.

Varietal denomination: The varietal denomination of the claimed variety of strawberry plant is `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Cultivated strawberry is a hybrid species of the genus Fragaria that is grown worldwide for its fruit. Modern strawberry was first bred in Brittany, France, in the 18.sup.th century by crossing Fragaria virginiana with Fragaria chiloensis. Strawberry fruit is an aggregate accessory fruit, with the fleshy part of the fruit being derived from the receptacle that holds the ovaries.

Strawberry varieties vary widely in color, size, shape, flavor, season of ripening, degree of fertility, and susceptibility to disease. Certain varieties vary in foliage, and some vary in the relative development of their reproductive organs. Typically, strawberry flowers appear hermaphroditic in structure, but function as either male or female. Generally, commercial production of strawberry plants involves propagation from runners and distribution as either plugs or bare root plants. Cultivation is either perennial or annual plasticulture. During the off season, strawberries can also be produced in greenhouses.

Strawberry fruit is widely appreciated for its characteristic bright red color, aroma, juicy texture, and sweetness. Strawberry fruit is a popular fruit that is generally consumed either fresh or in prepared foods, such as preserves and baked goods.

Strawberry is an important and valuable fruit crop. Accordingly, there is a need for new varieties of strawberry plants. In particular, there is a need for improved varieties of strawberry plant that are stable, high yielding, and agronomically sound.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to meet these needs, the present invention is directed to an improved variety of strawberry plant. In particular, the invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry plant (Fragaria x ananassa), which has been denominated as `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

Strawberry plant variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` was selected in Tapalpa, Mexico in October of 2012, and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent `73P176` (unpatented) and the proprietary male parent `107P249` (unpatented). A single plant was selected and asexually propagated via stolons in Tapalpa, Mexico.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` was subsequently asexually propagated via stolons, and underwent testing at a farm in Tapalpa, Mexico for six years. The present variety has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations via stolons.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` exhibits the following distinguishing characteristics over other similar varieties when grown under normal horticultural practices in Tapalpa, Mexico: 1. Higher yield; 2. Bearing that is partially remontant; 3. Stronger plant vigor; and 4. Larger fruit with sweet flavor.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` was selected for its yield potential, fruit size and flavor, and shelf-life.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

This new strawberry plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs which show fruit, flowers, and leaves of the plant. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures. The photographs are of plants that are six months old.

FIG. 1 illustrates whole fruit of variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

FIG. 2 illustrates longitudinal cross-sections of fruit of variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

FIG. 3 illustrates both the upper and lower surfaces of flowers of variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

FIG. 4A illustrates the upper surface of a leaf of variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`. FIG. 4B illustrates the lower surface of a leaf of variety `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`.

DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW VARIETY

The following detailed descriptions set forth the distinctive characteristics of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`. The data which define these characteristics is based on observations taken in Tapalpa, Mexico for six years. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic, and cultural conditions. `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` was taken from plants that were six months old. The indicated values represent averages calculated from measurements of several plants. Color references are primarily to The RHS Colour Chart of The Royal Horticultural Society of London (RHS) (2007 edition). Descriptive terminology follows the Plant Identification Terminology, An Illustrated Glossary, 2.sup.nd edition by James G. Harris and Melinda Woolf Harris, unless where otherwise defined.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT

Classification: Species.--Fragaria x ananassa. Common name.--Strawberry. Denomination.--`DrisStrawSixtyTwo`. Parentage: Female parent.--The proprietary variety `73P176` (unpatented). Male parent.--The proprietary variety `107P249` (unpatented). Plant: Height.--23.7 cm. Diameter.--35.9 cm. Number of crowns/plant.--6. Growth habit.--Spreading. Stolon: Average number of daughter plants per square foot.--17. Diameter at bract.--3.16 mm. Anthocyanin coloration.--Present. Anthocyanin color.--RHS 52A (Vivid red). Leaf: Number of leaflets.--Three only. Color of upper surface.--RHS 137A (Moderate olive green). Color of lower surface.--RHS 138A (Moderate yellowish green). Variegation.--Absent. Terminal Leaflets.--Length: 10.1 cm. Width: 10.2 cm. Length/width ratio: 1.0. Number of teeth/terminal leaflet: 22. Leaflet shape: Obicular. Shape of apex: Rounded. Shape of base: Obtuse. Margin: Crenate. Shape in cross section: Concave. Petiole.--Length: 16.0 cm. Diameter: 5.40 mm. Color: RHS 145B (Light yellow green). Attitude of hairs: Horizontal. Bract frequency (number present on each petiole): 2. Petiolule.--Length: 10.10 mm. Diameter: 3.10 mm. Color: RHS 145C (Light yellow green). Stipule.--Length: 3.3 cm. Width: 19.03 mm. Anthocyanin coloration: Absent. Inflorescence: Position in relation to foliage.--Same level. Pedicel.--Length: 12 cm. Diameter: 3 mm. Color: RHS 145C (Light yellow green). Attitude of hairs: Horizontal. Flower.--Flower diameter (petal tip to petal tip on non-flattened flower): 24.00 mm. Flower depth: 15 mm. Arrangement of petals: Overlapping. Stamen: Present. Typical and observed number of flowers per plant: 17.10. Petal.--Length: 14.90 mm. Width: 13.60 mm. Length/width ratio: 1.1. Petal shape: Orbicular. Shape of apex: Rounded. Shape of base: Concavo-convex. Margin: Entire. Typical and observed petal number: 6. Color of upper surface: RHS 155B (Yellowish white). Color of lower surface: RHS 155C (Greenish white). Calyx.--Diameter (sepal tip to sepal tip, measured on back of flower): 45.70 mm. Sepal.--Length (sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle): 23.60 mm. Width: 16.80 mm. Color of upper surface: RHS 139A (Dark yellowish green). Color of lower surface: RHS 144A (Strong yellowish green). Sepal shape: Elliptical. Shape of apex: Truncate. Margin: Entire. Typical and observed sepal number: 10. Fruit: Length.--57.30 mm. Width.--42.50 mm. Weight (individual fruit).--27 g. Length/width ratio.--1.3. Fruit hollow length.--27.20 mm. Fruit hollow width.--10.00 mm. Fruit hollow length/width ratio.--2.7. Shape.--Cylindrical. Color.--RHS 180A (Moderate red). Position of achenes.--Level with surface. Color of achenes.--RHS 1A (Brilliant greenish yellow). Position of calyx attachment.--Level with fruit. Attitude of sepals.--Upwards. Color of flesh (excluding core).--RHS 39A (Strong red). Color of core.--RHS 48B (Deep pink). Fruiting truss.--Length: 29 cm. Diameter: 5 mm. Color: RHS 145A (Strong yellow green). Number of berries per truss: 7 berries. Production: Flowering interval.--October to April. Harvest interval.--October to April. Type of bearing.--Partially everbearing to partially remontant. Productivity.--27806 kg to 36767 kg of fruit per hectare per season from six-month-old plants when grown in Tapalpa, Mexico. Resistance to abiotic stress, pests and diseases: Waterlogging.--Moderately susceptible. Two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae).--Susceptible. Botrytis fruit rot (Botrytis cinerea).--Moderately resistant. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera macularis).--Moderately resistant. Xanthomonas fragariae.--Moderately susceptible.

COMPARISON WITH PARENTAL AND COMMERCIAL VARIETIES

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` differs from the proprietary female parent `73P176` (unpatented) in that `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` has a bearing that is partially remontant, whereas `73P176` is a short day variety. Moreover, fruit of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` have a sweeter flavor and are less firm than fruit of `73P176`.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` differs from the proprietary male parent `107P249` (unpatented) in that plants of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` have a stronger vigor and produce higher yields of fruit than plants of `107P249`. Moreover, fruit of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` are larger in size with a less sweet taste than fruit of `107P249`.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` differs from the commercial variety `DrisStrawTwentySeven` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 23,400) in that plants of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` have absent or weak leaf blistering, while plants of `DrisStrawTwentySeven` have medium leaf blistering. Additionally, plants of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` have large flowers that are positioned level with foliage, while plants of `DrisStrawTwentySeven` have medium flowers that are positioned above foliage. Moreover, `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` has a terminal leaflet margin that is crenate, a fruit shape that is cylindrical, position of achenes that is level with surface of fruit, a medium width of band without achenes, position of calyx attachment that is level with fruit, and is moderately resistant to botrytis fruit rot and Xanthomonas fragariae; whereas `DrisStrawTwentySeven` has a terminal leaflet margin that is serrate, a fruit shape that is conical, position of achenes that is below surface of fruit, a very broad width of band without achenes, position of calyx attachment that is above fruit, is susceptible to botrytis fruit rot, and is moderately susceptible to powdery mildew.

`DrisStrawSixtyTwo` differs from the commercial variety `Driscoll El Dorado` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,238) in that `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` has a spreading growth habit and medium dense foliage, while `Driscoll El Dorado` has a semi-upright growth habit and dense foliage. Additionally, leaves of `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` have absent or weak leaf blistering, while leaves of `Driscoll El Dorado` have strong leaf blistering. Moreover, `DrisStrawSixtyTwo` has a terminal leaflet base that is obtuse in shape, hairs on petiole that have an attitude that is horizontal, fruit that is cylindrical in shape, position of achenes that is level with surface of fruit, and is moderately resistant to botrytis fruit rot; while `Driscoll El Dorado` has a terminal leaflet base that is rounded in shape, hairs on petiole that have an attitude that is upwards to outwards, fruit that is conical in shape, position of achenes that is below the surface of fruit, and is susceptible to botrytis fruit rot.

* * * * *

Patent Diagrams and Documents

Strawberry plant variety named `DrisStrawSixtyTwo`

Carrillo Mendoza , et al.

D00001

D00002

D00003

D00004

XML