Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a right side perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a left side perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 6 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a right side perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim and that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 8 is a left side perspective view of a second embodiment, it being understood that the interior of the tire forms no part of the claim; and,

FIG. 9 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 6, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines immediately adjacent to the outer edges of the tire shoulder represent boundaries of the claim, and the broken lines depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental Design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Shondel; Jonathan James (Massillon, OH), Nowacki; Marc Christopher (Uniontown, OH), Digman; Brian David (Sagamore Hills, OH)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/686,438
Filed:	April 4, 2019

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/517; D12/521
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/512,514,515,517,518,519,521,523,524,527,528,531,532,900

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D473513	April 2003	Welbes
D643804	August 2011	Dixon et al.
D670237	November 2012	Maxwell et al.
D673899	January 2013	Uphouse et al.
D674743	January 2013	Uphouse et al.
D696621	December 2013	Harvey et al.
D700884	March 2014	Herbeuval et al.
D709820	July 2014	Rohweder et al.
D733642	July 2015	Oberlin et al.
D737752	September 2015	Shondel
D771557	November 2016	Leocadio et al.
D784914	April 2017	Fontaine et al.
D795793	August 2017	Schoeppner et al.
D815584	April 2018	Hayashi
D822588	July 2018	Skurich et al.
D826137	August 2018	Mishima
D826138	August 2018	Yamaoka
D828281	September 2018	Luke et al.
D840326	February 2019	Hayashi
D847726	May 2019	Maggelet
D879016	March 2020	Liu
D883903	May 2020	Horiguchi
D887341	June 2020	Tsunekawa
D887955	June 2020	Tsunekawa

Other References

US. Appl. No. 29/624,557, filed Nov. 2, 2017, Davis, et al. cited by applicant . U.S. Appl. No. 29/677,108, filed Jan. 17, 2019, Fox, et al. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lipcsik; Robert N.

Images