Tire

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the other side being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side view is a mirror image thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken lines showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Fontaine; Sebastien Willy (Vichten, LU), Leconte; Armand Rene Gabriel (Gralingen, LU), Houchard; Stephane (Orgeo, BE), Collette; Jean Joseph Victor (Arlon, BE), Deblaize; Patrick Paul (Mamer, LU), Jacoby; Claude Charles (Wesserbillig, LU), Houba; Raymond Marie Joseph Ghislain (Vaux-sur-sure, BE)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Akron OH US
Assignee:	The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.:	D/443,659
Filed:	January 21, 2013

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/566
Current International Class:	1215
Field of Search:	;D12/533-567,900-901 ;152/209.1-209.9,209.11-209.19,209.21-209.28,455

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D346774	May 1994	Brayer et al.
D347814	June 1994	Brayer
D361966	September 1995	Graas et al.
D362420	September 1995	Heinen et al.
D379787	June 1997	Maxwell et al.
D400832	November 1998	Dixon et al.
D405730	February 1999	Maxwell
D407678	April 1999	Dixon et al.
D429194	August 2000	Heinen et al.
D429478	August 2000	Heinen et al.
D431800	October 2000	Heinen et al.
D441328	May 2001	Heinen et al.
D450032	November 2001	Heinen
D451454	December 2001	Clark et al.
D451853	December 2001	Heinen et al.
D451856	December 2001	Graas
D451867	December 2001	Clark et al.
D451868	December 2001	Graas et al.
D452198	December 2001	Heinen et al.
D455116	April 2002	Graas et al.
D472514	April 2003	Himuro
D490363	May 2004	Miyasaka et al.
D504106	April 2005	de Briey-Terlinden et al.
D504387	April 2005	Welbes et al.
D504866	May 2005	Collette et al.
D505112	May 2005	Heinen et al.
D533131	December 2006	Fontaine et al.
D548677	August 2007	Welbes et al.
D583305	December 2008	Ashton et al.
D586728	February 2009	Heinen et al.
D589874	April 2009	Fontaine et al.
D591221	April 2009	Fontaine et al.
D592588	May 2009	Heinen et al.
D595639	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D595640	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D596109	July 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D596557	July 2009	Park
D597475	August 2009	Heinen et al.
D597476	August 2009	de Briey-Terlinden
D601946	October 2009	Fontaine et al.
D606007	December 2009	Fontaine et al.
D610964	March 2010	Dixon et al.
D622657	August 2010	Leocadio et al.
D635912	April 2011	Knispel
D638350	May 2011	Knispel
D640184	June 2011	de Briey-Terlinden
D640966	July 2011	Fontaine et al.
D641305	July 2011	de Briey-Terlinden
D647460	October 2011	Takahashi
D659080	May 2012	Pons et al.

Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.