Shoe upper
Wright June 30, 2
U.S. patent number D595,043 [Application Number D/334,463] was granted by the patent office on 2009-06-30 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Ronald W. Wright.
| United States Patent | D595,043 |
| Wright | June 30, 2009 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wright; Ronald W. (Vancouver, WA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/334,463 |
| Filed: | March 26, 2009 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,906-908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45-49,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D361884 | September 1995 | Lozano |
| D365201 | December 1995 | Avar |
| D376901 | December 1996 | Avar et al. |
| D377712 | February 1997 | Avar et al. |
| D382102 | August 1997 | Teague |
| D383296 | September 1997 | Rask |
| D386296 | November 1997 | Lozano |
| D386603 | November 1997 | Avar |
| D391057 | February 1998 | Cooper |
| D393359 | April 1998 | Doxey |
| D395354 | June 1998 | Avar |
| D397242 | August 1998 | Mankowski |
| D407203 | March 1999 | Maxwell |
| D407204 | March 1999 | Avar |
| D407206 | March 1999 | Avar |
| D430725 | September 2000 | McDowell |
| D433217 | November 2000 | Link |
| D440755 | April 2001 | Lupo |
| D464480 | October 2002 | Morris |
| D498354 | November 2004 | Smith |
| D524527 | July 2006 | Shin |
| D543347 | May 2007 | Holmes |
| D547043 | July 2007 | Matis et al. |
| D568600 | May 2008 | Chang |
| D568601 | May 2008 | Chang |
| D570591 | June 2008 | Farys et al. |
| D587445 | March 2009 | Amphyon |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 1996, p. 22, published Mar. 1996. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 1996, p. 8, published Jun. 1995. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 1997, p. 25, published Dec. 1996. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 1997, pp. 29 and 191, published Mar. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 1997, p. 32, published Sep. 1996. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 1998, p. M28, published Dec. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 2001, pp. 33 and 36, published Nov. 2000. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 2001, p. 29, published Feb. 2001. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 2002, pp. M36 and W35, published Nov. 2001. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 2002, pp. 30 and 38, published Mar. 2002. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 2002, pp. 29 and 30, published Jun. 2001. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 1999, p. M32, published Nov. 1998. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a lateral side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof.
The broken line immediately adjacent to the shaded region represents an unclaimed boundary of the design. The broken line showing of the remainder of the shoe is for environmental purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 