U.S. patent number D464,480 [Application Number D/162,177] was granted by the patent office on 2002-10-22 for portion of a shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to E. Scott Morris.
United States Patent | D464,480 |
Morris | October 22, 2002 |
Inventors: | Morris; E. Scott (Hillsboro, OR) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
Appl. No.: | D/162,177 |
Filed: | June 12, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
Current International Class: | 0299 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,907,943,944,946,969,972,973 ;36/45,50.1,51,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-130 |
D116598 | September 1939 | Pick |
4255876 | March 1981 | Johnson |
4327503 | May 1982 | Johnson |
D276190 | November 1984 | Hess |
D319722 | September 1991 | Hatfield |
D320689 | October 1991 | Smith |
D326353 | May 1992 | Close |
D365199 | December 1995 | Avar |
D367553 | March 1996 | Delfel et al. |
D380291 | July 1997 | Morris |
D381874 | August 1997 | Kuerbis |
D382699 | August 1997 | Avar |
D383561 | September 1997 | Tresser |
D383791 | September 1997 | Avar |
D385095 | October 1997 | Avar et al. |
D385395 | October 1997 | Morris |
D385400 | October 1997 | Cooper |
D385412 | October 1997 | Teague |
D385693 | November 1997 | Cass |
D391056 | February 1998 | Teague |
D391057 | February 1998 | Cooper |
D391066 | February 1998 | Smith, III |
D391069 | February 1998 | Teague |
D393357 | April 1998 | Cooper |
D395353 | June 1998 | Avar |
D397245 | August 1998 | Mervar |
D397852 | September 1998 | Smith, III |
D397860 | September 1998 | Avar |
D398761 | September 1998 | Smith, III |
D401754 | December 1998 | Mervar |
D406448 | March 1999 | Rask |
D412235 | July 1999 | Taylor et al. |
D413716 | September 1999 | Neely |
D414599 | October 1999 | Doxey |
D418667 | January 2000 | McNaught |
D427753 | July 2000 | Hernandez |
D427759 | July 2000 | Hlavacs |
D431899 | October 2000 | Cooper |
D432782 | October 2000 | Tong |
D441182 | May 2001 | Link |
D442773 | May 2001 | Smith |
D447618 | September 2001 | Matis et al. |
Nike Footwear Fall 1990, p. 58, Air Cross Trainer High, Air Cross Trainer Low, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Spring 1991, p. 42, Air Tech Challenge 3/4, Air Tech Challenge Low, p. 46, Resolution, 3 pages. . Nike Footwear Late Spring 1994, p. 4, Air Wind runner, p. 34, Air Motu, 3 pages. . Nike Holiday 1994, p. 14, Air Strong High, Air Strong Mid, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Fall 1995, p. 120, Air Digs Mid, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Spring 1996, Men's, Women's and Kid's, p. 27, Air Max Penny, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Late Spring 1996, p. 95, Aqua Turf, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Fall 1996, p. 34, Air Worm Ndestrukt, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Holiday 1996, p. 22, Air Penny, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Spring 1997, p. 26, Air Zoom Flight Five, p. 104, Women's Air Lava Dome 2002, Air Hera Mid, 4 pages. . Nike Footwear Fall 1997, p. 175, Air Max Upthere, 3 pages. . Nike Footwear Spring 1998, p. 4, Air Zoom Pounce, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Holiday 2000, p. W5, Air Converge Max, 2 pages. . Nike Footwear Men's Fall 2002, p. 40, Air Shiver, p. 96, Mercurial Rapid F.G., Ultraccez Vapor Ft., 3 pages. . Nike Footwear Men's Holiday 2002, p. M83, Nike Air Mercurial Vapor 365, 2 pages.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.