U.S. patent number D377,712 [Application Number D/047,582] was granted by the patent office on 1997-02-04 for side element of a shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to Eric P. Avar, Matthew N. Rask.
United States Patent | D377,712 |
Avar , et al. | February 4, 1997 |
Inventors: | Avar; Eric P. (Aloha, OR), Rask; Matthew N. (Boring, OR) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
Appl. No.: | D/047,582 |
Filed: | December 7, 1995 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/902,972,970 ;36/3A,45,50.1,51,83,114,129 |
D220464 | April 1971 | Hayashi |
D301657 | June 1989 | Brown |
D342149 | December 1993 | Berger et al. |
D342599 | December 1993 | Luke |
D351058 | October 1994 | Hatfield et al. |
D356209 | March 1995 | Avar |
D356439 | March 1995 | Teague |
D356884 | April 1995 | Ho |
D361884 | September 1995 | Lozano |
D367554 | March 1996 | James |
5377430 | January 1995 | Hatfield et al. |
Nike Spring 1996 Footwear Catalog, published Jun. 1995, pp. 12, 41 and 43. . Nike Spring 1995 Footwear Catalog, published Jun. 1994, p. 35. . Nike Holiday 1994 Footwear Catalog, published Mar. 1994, p. 20.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.