U.S. patent number RE41,821 [Application Number 11/019,150] was granted by the patent office on 2010-10-12 for control of multiple power plants at a site to provide a distributed resource in a utility grid.
This patent grant is currently assigned to UTC Power Corporation. Invention is credited to Francis A. Fragola, Jr., Herbert C. Healy, Ricky M. Ross, Douglas Gibbons Young.
United States Patent |
RE41,821 |
Ross , et al. |
October 12, 2010 |
Control of multiple power plants at a site to provide a distributed
resource in a utility grid
Abstract
A site management system (11) is provided for a power system (8)
at site in a utility distribution grid (10). The power system (8)
includes multiple .[.fuel cell.]. power plants.Iadd., e.g., fuel
cells, .Iaddend.(18) and one or more loads (14), for selective
connection/disconnection with the grid (10). The site management
system (11) controls the power plants (18) in an integrated manner,
alternatively in a grid connected mode and a grid independent mode.
The multiple power plants (18) at the site may be viewed and
operated as a unified distributed resource on the grid (10). The
site management system (11) provides signals representative of the
present power capability (Kw Capacity--88) of each of the power
plants (18), and a signal (Total Kw Capacity--95) representative of
the total present power capability at the site. These power
representations are used to appropriately assign power dispatch
loadings to the respective .[.fuel cells.]. .Iadd.power plants
.Iaddend.(18) in the grid connected mode and in the grid
independent mode, and may also be used for load shedding.
Inventors: |
Ross; Ricky M. (Ellington,
CT), Fragola, Jr.; Francis A. (Wallingford, CT), Healy;
Herbert C. (Windsor, CT), Young; Douglas Gibbons
(Henderson, NV) |
Assignee: |
UTC Power Corporation (South
Windsor, CT)
|
Family
ID: |
25199654 |
Appl.
No.: |
11/019,150 |
Filed: |
December 21, 2004 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
Reissue of: |
09808762 |
Mar 15, 2001 |
06757590 |
Jun 29, 2004 |
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
700/286;
700/22 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H02J
13/00002 (20200101); H02J 13/0062 (20130101); H02J
3/387 (20130101); H02J 13/00016 (20200101); H02J
3/381 (20130101); Y02E 60/7838 (20130101); Y04S
10/12 (20130101); Y10S 429/90 (20130101); Y04S
10/30 (20130101); Y04S 40/124 (20130101); Y02E
40/70 (20130101); H02J 2300/30 (20200101); Y02E
60/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G05D
11/00 (20060101) |
Field of
Search: |
;60/603 ;429/12,13
;700/3,9,22,286,291,295,298 ;903/902,906,907,908,944 ;307/23,64
;323/207 ;363/34,65 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Gilbert, "The Nations largest fuel cell project, a 1 MW fuel cell
power plantdeployed as distributed generation resourxce, Anchorage,
Alaska project dedication Aug. 9, 2000", IEEE 2001, 1 page. cited
by examiner .
Schwartzenberg et al., "15 kV Medium Voltage Static Transfer
Switch", Silicon Power Corporation, IEEE 1995. cited by examiner
.
Wald, "Energy to Count on; Fuel Cells Tapped as Power Source for
Computer Systems", The New York Times, Aug. 1999. cited by examiner
.
De Miglio, "Anchorage mail processing center to be powered by
world's largest commercial fuel cell system", USPS, Aug. 1999.
cited by examiner .
"Fuel Cells for Distributed Generation", Energy Center Of
Wisconsin, Mar. 2000. cited by examiner .
Kornblit et al., "Installing a fuel cell on an existing power
system", IEEE, 1993. cited by examiner .
Carrasco et al., "Microcomputer control of a fuel cell power
system", IEEE, 1994. cited by examiner .
Nara et al., "An advanced flexible and reliable distribution
system", IEEE, 1995. cited by examiner .
Rajamani et al., "Islanding and load shedding schemes for captive
power plants", IEEE, 1998. cited by examiner .
Gilbert, Steve, "The Nations Largest Fuel Cell Project A 1 MW Fuel
Cell Power Plant Deployed as a Distributed Generation Resource",
Anchorage, Alaska, Aug. 9, 2000. cited by examiner .
EG & G Services Parsons, Inc., "Fuel Cell Handbook", 5th
edition, Oct. 2000. cited by examiner .
"The Huber Mills digital power report, Powering the Telecosm--Fuel
Cells II: Big and Hot", Gilder Publishing, Sep. 2000. cited by
examiner .
Binder, "Site Management System for Multiple Fuel Cell System
Operation", US Army Corps of Engineers, Oct. 2000. cited by
examiner .
Ditoro, "Fuel Cells: Improving the Bottom Line", HDR, Oct. 2000.
cited by examiner .
"Fuel Cells Prove Their Mettle, Provide Reliable Power", ACHRNEWS,
Jan. 2001. cited by examiner .
Holcomb et al., "Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells", US Army Corp of
Engineers, Dec. 2000. cited by examiner.
|
Primary Examiner: Rodriguez; Paul L
Assistant Examiner: Rodriguez; Carlos Ortiz
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Schneeberger; Stephen A.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
Reference is made here to related, patent application U.S. Ser. No.
09/782,402, filed Feb. 13, 2001 for System for Providing Assured
Power for a Critical Load by the same inventive entities as herein
and owned by the same assignee as herein, now U.S. Pat. No.
6,465,910 issued Oct. 15, 2002, which application/patent is
incorporated herein by reference to the extent necessary, if at
all, to provide essential and/or nonessential material.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A fuel cell-powered generating system (8) at a site for
inclusion as a distributed generating resource in a distributed
generation utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple fuel
cell power plants (18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one
electrical load (14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend.) located substantially
at the site; and c. a site management system (11) operatively
connected in each of the multiple fuel cell power plants
(18.sub.1-n), the at least one load (14), and the utility
.Iadd.power .Iaddend.grid (10) for .Iadd.issuing command signals
for .Iaddend.controlling .Iadd.multiple control functions of the
power generating system in an integrated manner, including
controlling .Iaddend.the multiple fuel cell power plants
(18.sub.1-n) .Iadd.and the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx)
.Iaddend.in an integrated manner, .Iadd.with respect to each other
and with respect to the at least one load, .Iaddend.in,
alternatively: i. a grid connected mode of operation having the
fuel cell power plants (18) .Iadd.directly .Iaddend.connected to
the at least one load (14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend.) and to the
.Iadd.utility .Iaddend.power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent
mode of operation having the fuel cell power plants (18)
.Iadd.directly .Iaddend.connected to the at least one load
(14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend.) independent of connection to the
.Iadd.utility .Iaddend.power grid (10).Iadd.; wherein the site
management system is configured to control a transition of each
fuel cell power plant from operation in one of the grid connect and
grid independent modes, to operation in the other.Iaddend..
2. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 1 wherein
each fuel cell power plant (18) includes a fuel cell and associated
sub-systems (F. C.) for generating power, a power plant controller
(PPC) for controlling and monitoring .[.the.]. .Iadd.a
.Iaddend.condition of the fuel cell and support sub-systems (F.
C.), and a power conditioning system (PCS) for conditioning the
power provided by the fuel cell to the .Iadd.at least one
.Iaddend.load.[.s.]. .Iadd.(14.sub.L1-Lx).Iaddend., the power plant
controller (PPC) further including signal processing logic (77, 79,
81, 85, 87) responsive to signals indicative of the monitored
condition of the fuel cell and support sub-systems (F. C.) for
providing a signal (Kw Capacity--88) representative of the instant
power output capacity of the respective fuel cell power plant (18),
and wherein the site management system (11, 94) is responsive to
the instant power output capacity signals (Kw capacity--88) from
each of the fuel cell power plants (18.Iadd..sub.1-n.Iaddend.) for
providing a signal (Total Kw Capacity--95) representative of the
total instant power output capacity of the multiple fuel cell power
plants (18.sub.1-n).
3. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 2, further
including a .Iadd.received .Iaddend.utility dispatch signal (58,
97) .[.received from the utility.]. , and wherein the site
management system (11) includes signal processing means (96, 97,
110) responsive to the .Iadd.received .Iaddend.utility dispatch
signal (58, 97) and the Total Kw Capacity signal (95) for selecting
the lesser thereof to provide an Actual Dispatch signal (98) and
for comparing the Actual Dispatch signal (98) with the Total Kw
Capacity signal (95) to provide a pro-rated dispatch signal (100),
and responsive to the pro-rated dispatch signal (100) and to the Kw
Capacity signals (88) from each of the respective fuel cell power
plants (18) to provide respective Set Power control signals (112,
90) for controlling .[.the.]. dispatch power for each respective
fuel cell power plant (18.sub.1-n).
4. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 3 wherein
the signal processing means (96, 97, 110) of the site management
system (11) determines .[.the.]. .Iadd.a .Iaddend.mathematical
product of the pro-rated dispatch signal (100) and each of the Kw
Capacity signals (88) from each of the respective fuel cell power
plants (18), to provide each of the respective Set Power Control
signals (112, 90).
5. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 1, further
including a .Iadd.received .Iaddend.utility dispatch signal (58,
97) .[.received from the utility.]. , each fuel cell power plant
(18) including a fuel cell and associated sub-systems (F. C.) for
generating power, a power plant controller (PPC) for controlling
and monitoring .[.the.]. .Iadd.a .Iaddend.condition of the fuel
cell and support sub-systems (F. C.), and a power conditioning
system (PCS) for conditioning the power provided by the fuel cells
to the loads, the power plant controller (PPC) further including
signal processing logic (77, 79, 81, 85, 87) responsive to
.[.the.]. signals indicative of the monitored condition of the fuel
cell and support sub-systems (F. C.) for providing a signal (Kw
Capacity--88) representative of the instant power output capacity
of the respective fuel cell power plant (18), and wherein the site
management system (11) includes signal processing means for
dividing the .Iadd.received .Iaddend.utility dispatch signal (58,
97) by the multiple number of fuel cell power plants (18) to
provide an initial per power plant dispatch signal value, for
comparing the Kw Capacity signal (88) for an initial fuel cell
power plant (18) with the per power plant dispatch signal value and
assigning to that plant as much of the per power plant dispatch
signal value as allowed by the respective Kw Capacity signal (88),
for storing any remainder value in overflow storage, for similarly
comparing and assigning to each successive one of the multiple fuel
cell power plants (18) as much of the per power plant dispatch
signal value as allowed by the respective Kw Capacity signal (88)
and storing any respective remainder value, and for iteratively
repeating the foregoing functions to allocate any remainder value
remaining in the overflow storage.
6. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 2, wherein
.Iadd.at least one of the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) is
connected (13) to receive power and .Iaddend.the site management
system (11) includes a power monitor (68) for providing a signal
(69) representative of the total power demand of the .Iadd.at least
one .Iaddend.connected load.[.s (14.sub.L1-LX).]. , and further
signal processing logic (34, 29) for comparing the total power
demand signal (69) and the Total Kw Capacity signal (95) and, if
and to the extent the total power demand exceeds the total Kw
Capacity, shedding .[.one or more.]. .Iadd.at least one connected
.Iaddend.loads .[.(14.sub.L1-LX).]. in accordance with a
predetermined schedule.
7. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 6, wherein
each .[.of the multiple.]. .Iadd.at least one connected
.Iaddend.load.[.s (14.sub.L1-LX).]. is connected to the fuel cell
power plants (18) through respective selectively controlled
contactors (13.sub.L1-LX), and wherein said shedding of .Iadd.the
at least .Iaddend.one .[.or more.]. of the .Iadd.connected
.Iaddend.load.[.s.]. is effected by selectively opening respective
ones of the contactors (13.sub.L1-LX).
8. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 1, wherein
the site management system (11) is connected to receive dispatch
signals from and provide status signals to, .[.the.]. .Iadd.a
.Iaddend.remote utility via communications linkage (58, 62, 64, 61)
.[.connected between the site management system (11) and the
utility.]. .
9. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 8, wherein
the site management system includes a site supervisory controller
(29) for effecting the integrated control of the multiple fuel cell
power plants (18) and providing .[.the.]. control interface with
the .Iadd.remote .Iaddend.utility.
10. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 9, wherein
the site management system (11) includes a means (60) operatively
connected with the site supervisory controller (29) for manually
selecting operation of the generating system (8) either in a local
operating mode in which the multiple power plants (18) are
controlled individually or in a supervisory operating mode in which
the multiple power plants (18) are operated in a unified
manner.
11. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 1, wherein
the site management system (11) comprises a site supervisory
controller (29) for effecting the integrated control of the
multiple fuel cell power plants (18), a load shed controller (34)
connected (38, 70) to interact with the site supervisory controller
(29) and the .Iadd.at least one .Iaddend.load.[.s.].
(14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend..[., 13.]. ) to control load shedding,
and a site management controller (31) connected to each of the fuel
cell power plants (18) for controlling the power provided by the
power plants (18) to the .Iadd.at least one .Iaddend.load.[.s.].
(14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend.).
12. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 2, wherein
the site management system (11) comprises a site supervisory
controller (29) for establishing, in response to a .Iadd.received
utility .Iaddend.power dispatch signal .[.from the utility.]. ,
.[.the.]. power dispatch loading of the fuel cell power plants (18)
in an integrated manner when operating in the grid connected mode,
a load shed controller (34) connected (38, 70) to interact with the
site supervisory controller (29) and the .Iadd.at least one
.Iaddend.load.[.s.]. (14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend..[.,13.]. ), and a
site management controller (31) connected to the PCSs of each of
the respective fuel cell power plants (18) for controlling the
transition of each fuel cell power plant (18) from operation in one
of the grid connected and the grid independent modes, to operation
in the other.
13. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 12,
wherein said site management system (11) further includes high
speed, static switching means (12) connected to the utility
.Iadd.power .Iaddend.grid (10), the fuel cell power plants (18,
15), and the .Iadd.at least one .Iaddend.load.[.s.].
(14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend..[., 13, 39.]. ) for rapidly
disconnecting the .Iadd.at least one .Iaddend.load.[.s.].
(14.Iadd..sub.L1-Lx.Iaddend.) and the fuel cell power plants (18)
from the utility .Iadd.power .Iaddend.grid (10) and transitioning
from the grid connected mode of operation to the grid independent
mode of operation.
14. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 2, wherein
initial power rating signals (Kw Rating--76) representative of a
base power capacity are provided for each of the multiple fuel cell
power plants (18.sub.1-n), and the signal processing logic (77, 79)
is responsive to the monitored condition of each of the respective
fuel cells and support sub-systems (F. C..sub.1-n) to foldback the
base power capacity (Kw Rating--76) of the respective power plant
(18) by an amount predetermined in accordance with the monitored
condition to thereby provide the respective instant power output
capacity signal value (Kw Capacity--88).
.[.15. A fuel cell-powered generating system (8) at a site for
inclusion as a distributed generating resource in a distributed
generation utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple fuel
cell power plants (18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one
electrical load (14) located substantially at the site; c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple fuel cell power plants (18), the at least one load (14),
and the utility grid (10) for controlling the multiple fuel cell
power plants (18.sub.1-n) in an integrated manner, in,
alternatively: i. a grid connected mode of operation having the
fuel cell power plants (18) connected to the at least one load (14)
and to the power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode of
operation having the fuel cell power plants (18) connected to the
at least one load (14) independent of connection to the power grid
(10), and wherein each fuel cell power plant (18) includes a fuel
cell and associated sub-systems (F. C.) for generating power, a
power plant controller (PPC) for controlling and monitoring the
condition of the fuel cell and support sub-systems (F. C.), and a
power conditioning system (PCS) for conditioning the power provided
by the fuel cell to the loads, the power plant controller (PPC)
further including signal processing logic (77, 79, 81, 85, 87)
responsive to signals indicative of the monitored condition of the
fuel cell and support sub-systems (F. C.) for providing a signal
(Kw Capacity--88) representative of the instant power output
capacity of the respective fuel cell power plant (18)..].
.[.16. The fuel cell-powered generating system (8) of claim 15,
wherein said site management system (11) further includes high
speed, static switching means (12) connected to the utility grid
(10), the fuel cell power plants (18, 15), and the loads (14, 13,
39) for rapidly disconnecting the loads (14) and the fuel cell
power plants (18) from the utility grid (10) and transitioning from
the grid connected mode of operation to the grid independent mode
of operation..].
.[.17. A fuel cell-powered generating system (8) at a site for
inclusion as a distributed generating resource in a distributed
generation utility power grid (10), comprising: d. multiple fuel
cell power plants (18.sub.1-n) at the site; e. at least one
electrical load (14) located substantially at the site; and f. a
site management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple fuel cell power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14), and the utility grid (10) for controlling the multiple fuel
cell power plants (18.sub.1-n) in an integrated manner, in,
alternatively: i. a grid connected mode of operation having the
fuel cell power plants (18) connected to the at least one load (14)
and to the power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode of
operation having the fuel cell power plants (18) connected to the
at least one load (14) independent of connection to the power grid
(10), wherein the site management system (11) further includes high
speed, static switching means (12) connected to the utility grid
(10), the fuel cell power plants (18, 15), and the loads (14, 13,
39) for rapidly disconnecting the loads (14) and the fuel cell
power plants (18) from the utility grid (10) and transitioning from
the grid connected mode of operation to the grid independent mode
of operation to substantially continuously maintain power to the
loads (14) from the fuel cell power plants (18)..].
.Iadd.18. A power generating system (8) at a site for inclusion as
a distributed generating resource in a distributed generation
utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple power plants
(18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one electrical load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) located substantially at the site; and c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and the utility power grid (10) for issuing command
signals for controlling multiple control functions of the power
generating system in an integrated manner, including controlling
the multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n) and the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) in an integrated manner, with respect to each other
and with respect to the at least one load, in, alternatively: i. a
grid connected mode of operation having the power plants (18)
directly connected to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and to
the utility power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode of
operation having the power plants (18) directly connected to the at
least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) independent of connection to the
utility power grid (10); wherein the site management system is
configured to control a transition of each power plant from
operation in one of the grid connect and grid independent modes, to
operation in the other. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.19. The power generating system (8) of claim 18 wherein each
power plant (18) generates power and includes a power plant
controller (PPC) for controlling and monitoring the condition of
the power plant and a power conditioning system (PCS) for
conditioning the power provided by the power plant to the at least
one load (14.sub.L1-Lx), the power plant controller (PPC) further
including signal processing logic (77, 79, 81, 85, 87) responsive
to signals indicative of the monitored condition of the power plant
for providing a signal (Kw Capacity--88) representative of the
instant power output capacity of the respective power plant (18),
and wherein the site management system (11, 94) is responsive to
the instant power output capacity signals (Kw capacity--88) from
each of the power plants (18.sub.1-n) for providing a signal (Total
Kw Capacity--95) representative of the total instant power output
capacity of the multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.20. The power generating system (8) of claim 19, further
including a received utility dispatch signal (58,97), and wherein
the site management system (11) includes signal processing means
(96, 97, 110) responsive to the received utility dispatch signal
(58, 97) and the Total Kw Capacity signal (95) for selecting the
lesser thereof to provide an Actual Dispatch signal (98) and for
comparing the Actual Dispatch signal (98) with the Total Kw
Capacity signal (95) to provide a pro-rated dispatch signal (100),
and responsive to the pro-rated dispatch signal (100) and to the Kw
Capacity signals (88) from each of the respective power plants (18)
to provide respective Set Power control signals (112, 90) for
controlling dispatch power for each respective power plant
(18.sub.1-n). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.21. The power generating system (8) of claim 20 wherein the
signal processing means (96, 97, 110) of the site management system
(11) determines a mathematical product of the pro-rated dispatch
signal (100) and each of the Kw Capacity signals (88) from each of
the respective power plants (18), to provide each of the respective
Set Power Control signals (112, 90). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.22. The power generating system (8) of claim 18, further
including a received utility dispatch signal (58, 97), each power
plant (18) generates power and includes a power plant controller
(PPC) for controlling and monitoring a condition of the power plant
and a power conditioning system (PCS) for conditioning the power
provided by the power plant to the loads, the power plant
controller (PPC) further including signal processing logic (77, 79,
81, 85, 87) responsive to signals indicative of the monitored
condition of the power plant for providing a signal (Kw
Capacity--88) representative of the instant power output capacity
of the respective power plant (18), and wherein the site management
system (11) includes signal processing means for dividing the
received utility dispatch signal (58, 97) by the multiple number of
power plants (18) to provide an initial per power plant dispatch
signal value, for comparing the Kw Capacity signal (88) for an
initial power plant (18) with the per power plant dispatch signal
value and assigning to that plant as much of the per power plant
dispatch signal value as allowed by the respective Kw Capacity
signal (88), for storing any remainder value in overflow storage,
for similarly comparing and assigning to each successive one of the
multiple power plants (18) as much of the per power plant dispatch
signal value as allowed by the respective Kw Capacity signal (88)
and storing any respective remainder value, and for iteratively
repeating the foregoing functions to allocate any remainder value
remaining in the overflow storage. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.23. The power generating system (8) of claim 19, wherein at
least one of the at least one loads (14.sub.L1-Lx) is connected
(13) to receive power and the site management system (11) includes
a power monitor (68) for providing a signal (69) representative of
the total power demand of the at least one connected load, and
further signal processing logic (34, 29) for comparing the total
power demand signal (69) and the Total Kw Capacity signal (95) and,
if and to the extent the total power demand exceeds the Total Kw
Capacity, shedding the at least one connected load in accordance
with a predetermined schedule. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.24. The power generating system (8) of claim 23, wherein each
at least one connected load is connected to the power plants (18)
through respective selectively controlled contactors
(13.sub.L1-Lx), and wherein said shedding of the at least one
connected load is effected by selectively opening respective ones
of the contactors (13.sub.L1-Lx). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.25. The power generating system (8) of claim 18, wherein the
site management system (11) is connected to receive dispatch
signals from and provide status signals to, a remote utility via
communications linkage (58, 62, 64, 61). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.26. The power generating system (8) of claim 25, wherein the
site management system includes a site supervisory controller (29)
for effecting the integrated control of the multiple power plants
(18) and providing control interface with the remote utility.
.Iaddend.
.Iadd.27. The power generating system (8) of claim 26, wherein the
site management system (11) includes a means (60) operatively
connected with the site supervisory controller (29) for manually
selecting operation of the generating system (8) either in a local
operating mode in which the multiple power plants (18) are
controlled individually or in a supervisory operating mode in which
the multiple power plants (18) are operated in a unified manner.
.Iaddend.
.Iadd.28. The power generating system (8) of claim 18, wherein the
site management system (11) comprises a site supervisory controller
(29) for effecting the integrated control of the multiple power
plants (18), a load shed controller (34) connected (38, 70) to
interact with the site supervisory controller (29) and the at least
one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) to control load shedding, and a site
management controller (31) connected to each of the power plants
(18) for controlling the power provided by the power plants (18) to
the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.29. The power generating system (8) of claim 19, wherein the
site management system (11) comprises a site supervisory controller
(29) for establishing, in response to a received utility power
dispatch signal, power dispatch loading of the power plants (18) in
an integrated manner when operating in the grid connected mode, a
load shed controller (34) connected (38, 70) to interact with the
site supervisory controller (29) and the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and a site management controller (31) connected to
the PCSs of each of the respective power plants (18) for
controlling the transition of each power plant (18) from operation
in one of the grid connected and the grid independent modes, to
operation in the other. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.30. The power generating system (8) of claim 29, wherein said
site management system (11) further includes high speed, static
switching means (12) connected to the utility power grid (10), the
power plants (18), and the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) for
rapidly disconnecting the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and the
power plants (18) from the utility power grid (10) and
transitioning from the grid connected mode of operation to the grid
independent mode of operation. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.31. The power generating system (8) of claim 19, wherein
initial power rating signals (Kw Rating--76) representative of a
base power capacity are provided for each of the multiple power
plants (18.sub.1-n), and the signal processing logic (77, 79) is
responsive to the monitored condition of each of the respective
power generating means (F. C..sub.1-n) to foldback the base power
capacity (Kw Rating--76) of the respective power plant (18) by an
amount predetermined in accordance with the monitored condition to
thereby provide the respective instant power output capacity signal
value (Kw Capacity--88). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.32. A power generating system (8) at a site for inclusion as
a distributed generating resource in a distributed generation
utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple power plants
(18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one electrical load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) located substantially at the site; c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and the utility power grid (10) for controlling the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n) and the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) in an integrated manner, with respect to each other
and with respect to the at least one load, in, alternatively: i. a
grid connected mode of operation having the power plants (18)
directly connected to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and to
the utility power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode of
operation having the power plants (18) directly connected to the at
least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) independent of connection to the
utility power grid (10), wherein the site management system is
configured to control a transition of each power plant from
operation in one of the grid connect and grid independent modes, to
operation in the other, and wherein each power plant (18) includes
means (F. C.) for generating power, a power plant controller (PPC)
for controlling and monitoring a condition of the power generating
means (F. C.), and a power conditioning system (PCS) for
conditioning the power provided by the power generating means to
the loads, the power plant controller (PPC) further including
signal processing logic (77, 79, 81, 85, 87) responsive to signals
indicative of the monitored condition of the power generating means
(F. C.) for providing a signal (Kw Capacity--88) representative of
the instant power output capacity of the respective power plant
(18). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.33. The power generating system (8) of claim 32, wherein said
site management system (11) further includes high speed, static
switching means (12) connected to the utility power grid (10), the
power plants (18), and the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) for
rapidly disconnecting the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and the
power plants (18) from the utility power grid (10) and
transitioning from the grid connected mode of operation to the grid
independent mode of operation. .Iaddend.
.Iadd.34. A power generating system (8) at a site for inclusion as
a distributed generating resource in a distributed generation
utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple power plants
(18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one electrical load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) located substantially at the site; and c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and the utility grid (10) for controlling the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n) and the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) in an integrated manner, with respect to each other
and with respect to the at least one load, in, alternatively: i. a
grid connected mode of operation having the power plants (18)
directly connected to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and to
the utility power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode of
operation having the power plants (18) directly connected to the at
least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) independent of connection to the
utility power grid (10), wherein the site management system is
configured to control a transition of each power plant from
operation in one of the grid connect and grid independent modes, to
operation in the other, and wherein the site management system (11)
further includes high speed, static switching means (12) connected
to the utility power grid (10), the power plants (18), and the at
least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) for rapidly disconnecting the at
least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) and the power plants (18) from the
utility power grid (10) and transitioning from the grid connected
mode of operation to the grid independent mode of operation to
substantially continuously maintain power to the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) from the power plants (18). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.35. A power generating system (8) at a site for inclusion as
a distributed generating resource in a distributed generation
utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple power plants
(18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one electrical load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) located substantially at the site; and c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and the utility power grid (10) for controlling the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n) in an integrated manner, in,
alternatively: iii. a grid connected mode of operation having the
power plants (18) connected to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx)
and to the utility power grid (10), and iv. a grid independent mode
of operation having the power plants (18) connected to the at least
one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) independent of connection to the utility
power grid (10); wherein each power plant (18) generates power and
includes a power plant controller (PPC) for controlling and
monitoring the condition of the power plant and a power
conditioning system (PCS) for conditioning the power provided by
the power plant to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx), the power
plant controller (PPC) further including signal processing logic
(77, 79, 81, 85, 87) responsive to signals indicative of the
monitored condition of the power plant for providing a signal (Kw
Capacity--88) representative of the instant power output capacity
of the respective power plant (18), and wherein the site management
system (11, 94) is responsive to the instant power output capacity
signals (Kw capacity--88) from each of the power plants
(18.sub.1-n) for providing a signal (Total Kw Capacity--95)
representative of the total instant power output capacity of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n); and further including a
received utility dispatch signal (58,97), and wherein the site
management system (11) includes signal processing means (96, 97,
110) responsive to the received utility dispatch signal (58, 97)
and the Total Kw Capacity signal (95) for selecting the lesser
thereof to provide an Actual Dispatch signal (98) and for comparing
the Actual Dispatch signal (98) with the Total Kw Capacity signal
(95) to provide a pro-rated dispatch signal (100), and responsive
to the pro-rated dispatch signal (100) and to the Kw Capacity
signals (88) from each of the respective power plants (18) to
provide respective Set Power control signals (112, 90) for
controlling dispatch power for each respective power plant
(18.sub.1-n). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.36. The power generating system (8) of claim 35 wherein the
signal processing means (96, 97, 110) of the site management system
(11) determines a mathematical product of the pro-rated dispatch
signal (100) and each of the Kw Capacity signals (88) from each of
the respective power plants (18), to provide each of the respective
Set Power Control signals (112, 90). .Iaddend.
.Iadd.37. A power generating system (8) at a site for inclusion as
a distributed generating resource in a distributed generation
utility power grid (10), comprising: a. multiple power plants
(18.sub.1-n) at the site; b. at least one electrical load
(14.sub.L1-Lx) located substantially at the site; and c. a site
management system (11) operatively connected to each of the
multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n), the at least one load
(14.sub.L1-Lx), and the utility power grid (10) for issuing command
signals for controlling multiple control functions of the power
generating system in an integrated manner, including controlling
the multiple power plants (18.sub.1-n) in an integrated manner, in,
alternatively: i. a grid connected mode of operation having the
power plants (18) connected to the at least one load (14.sub.L1-Lx)
and to the utility power grid (10), and ii. a grid independent mode
of operation having the power plants (18) connected to the at least
one load (14.sub.L1-Lx) independent of connection to the utility
power grid (10); and further including a received utility dispatch
signal (58, 97), each power plant (18) generates power and includes
a power plant controller (PPC) for controlling and monitoring a
condition of the power plant and a power conditioning system (PCS)
for conditioning the power provided by the power plant to the
loads, the power plant controller (PPC) further including signal
processing logic (77, 79, 81, 85, 87) responsive to signals
indicative of the monitored condition of the power plant for
providing a signal (Kw Capacity--88) representative of the instant
power output capacity of the respective power plant (18), and
wherein the site management system (11) includes signal processing
means for dividing the received utility dispatch signal (58, 97) by
the multiple number of power plants (18) to provide an initial per
power plant dispatch signal value, for comparing the Kw Capacity
signal (88) for an initial power plant (18) with the per power
plant dispatch signal value and assigning to that plant as much of
the per power plant dispatch signal value as allowed by the
respective Kw Capacity signal (88), for storing any remainder value
in overflow storage, for similarly comparing and assigning to each
successive one of the multiple power plants (18) as much of the per
power plant dispatch signal value as allowed by the respective Kw
Capacity signal (88) and storing any respective remainder value,
and for iteratively repeating the foregoing functions to allocate
any remainder value remaining in the overflow storage. .Iaddend.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates .Iadd.generally to power systems and
.Iaddend.to the control of .[.fuel cell.]. power plants, and more
particularly to the control of multiple .[.fuel cell.]. power
plants at a site. More particularly still, the invention relates to
the control of multiple fuel cells at a site to provide a
distributed resource in a utility grid.
BACKGROUND ART
Individual fuel cells have been used both experimentally and
commercially in various configurations to power various electrical
loads. In the main, the applications have relied on a single fuel
cell, or fuel cell power plant, to supply electrical power to one
or more loads at the site. While such sites may be mobile, as in
the powering of the electric drive motor of a vehicle, in the main
they are large and stationary. These applications have typically
been individual commercial installations or buildings, perhaps
involving computers or similar electronic data processing equipment
or medical equipment requiring a reliable source of power.
To operate such fuel cell power plants, there are normally
associated various controls for the direct control of the fuel cell
itself and its production of DC electrical power, as well as
additional controls for convening the DC power to AC power, for
connecting and disconnecting power with the loads, etc. In some
instances, the fuel cell power plant is connected to the loads in
parallel with the normal electric utility grid, and may act in lieu
of, or in addition to, the grid to supply power to the loads. In
other instances, there may be multiple fuel cell power plants at a
site, collectively connected to the loads in parallel with the
utility grid. However, even in such configuration, the control of
the fuel cells has typically been on an individual basis, with
little or no provision for an integrated control arrangement to
optimize the use of multiple fuel cell power plants interconnected
with the utility grid and the loads.
When one or more fuel cell power plants are connected to the
utility grid as well as the loads, they are said to be in a grid
connected (GIC) configuration or mode. Alternatively, when those
fuel cell power plants are connected only to the loads, they are
said to be in grid independent (G/I) mode. In the G/I mode, the
fuel cell power plants typically follow the load and apportion the
load among the power plants. The transition from one such mode to
the other, and the control of multiple fuel cell power plants
relative to the loads present additional control complexities that
have impeded the efficient and economic utilization of multiple
fuel cell power plants as distributed resources in electric utility
grids.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide .Iadd.a
power system having .Iaddend.a control arrangement for the
efficient and economic utilization of multiple .[.fuel cell.].
power plants.Iadd., e.g., fuel cells, .Iaddend.at a site as a
distributed resource in a utility grid.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a control
arrangement to optimize the interrelationship between multiple fuel
cell power plants and multiple loads at a site in order to enhance
utilization of the plants as a distributed resource in a utility
grid.
It is a still further object to provide a control arrangement for a
multiple fuel cell power plant generation system at a site that
coordinates operation of the fuel cell power plants in an
integrated, or unified, manner in both the G/C and the G/I modes of
operation.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
The present invention concerns the control of multiple .[.fuel
cell.]. power plants .Iadd.in a power system .Iaddend.at a site,
particularly as a distributed resource for inclusion in a utility
grid. The invention further concerns the unified, or integrated,
control of multiple fuel cell power plants at a site, both in a
grid connected (G/C) mode to facilitate their use as a distributed
resource in a utility grid network and in a grid independent (G/I)
mode to optimize their value and utility as an/the independent
power supply to one, or typically multiple, customer loads at the
site.
Accordingly the present invention relates to a fuel cell-powered
generating system at a site for inclusion as a distributed
generating resource in a distributed generation utility power grid,
and comprises multiple fuel cell power plants at the site, at least
one, and typically multiple, loads located substantially at the
site, and a site management system operatively connected to the
multiple fuel cell power plants, the one or more loads, and the
utility grid for controlling the fuel cell power plants in an
integrated, or unified manner, in, alternatively, a grid connected
mode of operation having the fuel cell power plants connected to
the load(s) and to the power grid, and a grid independent mode
having the fuel cell power plants connected to the load(s)
independent of connection to the power grid. This integrated
control provided by the site management system allows the utility
to view the multiple fuel cell power plants at the site as a
single, or unified, distributed generating resource when connected
to the grid. Accordingly, as used in this context, the terms
"integrated" and "unified" are viewed as being substantially
synonymous. Moreover, the integrated control facilitates the
operation of the site in the G/I mode where the fuel cells are
typically load-following and have operated independently of one
another. In this latter regard, the integrated control in the G/I
mode further facilitates a load management (sharing and shedding)
capability for assuring power to critical loads.
The fuel cell power plants each include control and logic
capabilities for folding back (reducing) rated power levels to
lesser levels, if necessary, in response to various power plant
conditions, and for providing signals representative of the instant
power level capability of the respective plants. As used herein in
association with power capacity and load demand, the term "instant"
is intended to be synonymous with "present", "current", or
"instantaneous". The site management system sums the individual
power capacities of the respective fuel cell power plants and
obtains a measure of the total instant power capacity of the
multiple power plants at the site. This measure of total power
capacity and the respective individual power capacity measures are
used to provide a site power measure to the utility grid and to
appropriately load each of the power plants in G/C mode, and are
used in the G/I mode to appropriately load each of the power plants
to operate in a unified manner and further, for a load shedding
function. In this latter regard and assuming multiple loads, the
site management system is operative to recognize the instant load
demand, the instant total power capacity, and a predetermined
prioritization of the loads in the event load demand exceeds
instant total power capacity, and to selectively shed or disconnect
loads in accordance with the schedule, if necessary.
The site management system includes at least one, and typically
several, signal processing logic controllers cooperatively
interacting with one another, the multiple fuel cell power plants,
and the utility grid to perform the integrated control functions of
the invention.
The foregoing features and advantages of the present invention will
become more apparent in light of the following detailed description
of exemplary embodiments thereof as illustrated in the accompanying
drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic block diagram of a power system,
employing multiple fuel cell power plants at a site, as a
distributed resource in a utility grid system and a backup power
source to one or more loads located at the site when the grid is
unavailable;
FIG. 2 is a generalized, functional schematic block diagram
illustrating the development of a signal representative of the
present power generating capacity of a respective fuel cell power
plant; and
FIG. 3 is a generalized, functional schematic block diagram
algorithmically illustrating the power dispatch loading of multiple
fuel cell power plants when operating in the G/C mode.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Referring to FIG. 1, there is depicted a simplified block diagram
of a fuel cell-based power system 8 in accordance with the
invention, which is readily available and utilized at a site as a
distributed resource in a utility grid system. The power system 8
is connected to utility grid bus 10, and employs multiple fuel cell
power plants 18 located at a common site, for supplying, with the
grid 10, 3-phase power to, and through, load contactor array 13 to
loads 14, usually also at the same site. In the preferred and
normal instance, the fuel cell power plants 18 provide power to the
loads 14 on a substantially continuous basis, irrespective of
occasional disconnects of the utility grid 10 from the power plants
18 and loads 14. Switching gear, generally designated 12 and
described below, includes a static switch that rapidly opens during
utility grid disturbances to isolate the loads 14 and the fuel cell
power plants 18 from the grid 10, and the fuel cells provide
substantially continuous power to the loads during these
disturbances. For simplicity, a "single line" diagram, or
representation is used herein to depict the 3-phase supply lines,
as well as their included switches and other circuit components.
Similarly, with respect to the control circuitry forming part of
this invention, it will be understood that single-line
representations have often been used for twisted pairs, or grouped
parallel leads, which serve as signal conductors. For convenience
of explanation and visual distinction, the portions of the
schematic carrying the relatively higher voltage/current/power to
the loads 14 are bolded, in contrast with the lower-voltage,
control portions of the system 8.
The grid 10, the fuel cell power plants 18, and the loads 14 are
interconnected and controlled through a Site Management System
(SMS), represented by broken line block 11. The loads 14, here
designated L.sub.1, L.sub.2, . . . L.sub.x, are those of the
customer at the site, and typically include one or more "critical"
loads, such as computers, electronic data processing devices,
and/or medical devices, that require a substantially continuous
supply of power. Others of those loads 14 may be less critical,
being able to tolerate brief or longer-term power interruptions. In
a typical contactor array 13, there may be 12 individual,
separately-controllable, contactors i.e., 1, 2, . . . X, with
respective loads L.sub.1, L.sub.2 . . . L.sub.x connected to a
terminal thereof. Selective actuation of the individual contactors
may be used to selectively connect and disconnect the respective
loads from the power sources, as will be described hereinafter.
The utility grid bus 10, following step-down by transformer 20,
normally provides power at 480 Vac and 60 Hz, as also do the fuel
cell power plants 18 via lead, or bus, 15, through the delta-to-wye
transformer 27. Switching gear, 12 serves to interconnect the fuel
cell power plants 18 through bus 15, the loads 14 through a load
power bus 39, and the utility grid 10. In this way, the fuel cell
power plants 18 (or simply "fuel cells 18" or "power plants 18")
are available and connected for supplying power on a full time
basis to the loads 14 or to the loads 14 and utility grid 10, for
economical usage of the fuel cells. The switching gear 12
preferably includes a high current capacity, high speed, static
(solid-state) switching arrangement and several inter-tie or
breaker switches (not shown), as described in the aforementioned
application U.S. Ser No. 09/782,402, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,910.
The static switch, which may be pairs of counter-connected, silicon
controlled rectifiers, serves as the main operational switch, and
is closed during normal operation of the grid 10, to connect the
grid 10 with the power plants 18 and loads 14, and is open if the
grid goes out of limits or if an "enable" signal is removed. The
breaker switches are typically electromechanical and may be
automatically or manually actuated to selectively provide bypass
paths around the static switch and/or to open otherwise closed
paths. Global bypass breakers 19 connected to busses 15, 10 and 39,
serve, when manually closed, to further bypass the switching gear
12, as during maintenance or a start-up or shutting down
operation.
There are multiple fuel cell power plants 18 at the site, and it is
the integrated control of and/or involving, those multiple power
plants 18 which comprises the present invention. In an exemplary
arrangement, five (5) such power plants 18 are located at the site
and controlled by the SMS 11. Each power plant 18 is a 200 kw
International Fuel Cells, LLC (formerly ONSI) PC25.TM. power plant,
with the five units collectively being capable of providing up to 1
megawatt of power. Each such power plant 18 includes the basic fuel
cell (F.C.), a Power Plant Controller (PPC), and a Power
Conditioning System (PCS) which includes its own separate
controller. The fuel cell, F.C., includes (not shown) a fuel stack
assembly, ancillary fuel processing and delivery equipment, oxidant
delivery equipment, and a water and steam management system, as is
generally well known. The PPC includes the controls, logic and
monitoring equipment directly associated with the operation and
control of the respective F.C., as generally known, and including
additional provision for evaluating the present power generating
capability of the power plant 18, as will be described. The PCS
contains a solid-state inverter and its controller which converts
DC power to AC power at the desired voltage and frequency. Control
of and by the PCS, as through its associated controller and the
other controllers to be hereinafter discussed, further enables
conversion of the mode of operation of a power plant 18 from G/C to
G/I, and vice versa, as is generally known and will be better
understood by reference to the aforementioned application U.S. Ser.
No. 09/782,402, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,910. When used in G/C mode,
the variable controlled by the PCS is power delivered (both real
and reactive). When used in the G/I mode, the variables controlled
are output voltage and frequency, and, if multiple power plants 18
are involved, phase. The output voltage of a three-phase system is,
of course, controlled to be at a phase angle of 120.degree. between
each phase. The outputs of the several fuel cell power plants 18
are collectively joined by bus 15. Control signals may be exchanged
between the several component portions of a power plant 18, i.e.,
the F.C, PPC, and PCS, via one or more signal paths, here
collectively depicted for convenience as a common signal bus and
I/O port 30.
In addition to the switching gear 12, the SMS 11 for the site
includes three controllers which are responsible for coordinating
integrated operation of the multiple power plants 18, first with
respect to each other and with respect to the customer loads 14,
and ultimately as a single power resource with respect to the
utility grid.
A Site Management Controller (SMC) 31 provides direct control of
the PCSs of the fuel cells 18 in response to mode
indicating/controlling signals M1 and M2 Image Page 4 on lead 40
from logic associated with the static switch of switching gear 12,
and further in response to a grid voltage reference signal 10'
provided by grid sensing circuitry 37. The grid sensing circuitry
37 typically includes a potential transformer (sensor) and a
current transformer (sensor) to sense the voltage and current of
grid 10 and provide respective signals thereof. The mode signals M1
and M2 from switching gear 12 are indicative of switching of the
static switch, and thus the need for a mode change from G/C to G/I,
or vice versa. Logic associated with the static switch receives a
signal via lead 10'' from the grid sensing circuitry 37 and
determines whether the grid is within limits or not. A change in
this condition acts through the logic to "toggle" the static
switch, as described in the aforementioned application U.S. Ser.
No. 09/782,402, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,910, and to signal such
action via the M1 and M2 signals on lead 40. The SMC 31 also
includes provision for issuing load share control signals to each
of the PCSs of the respective fuel cells 18, to apportion the load
among the fuel cells 18 during load following operation in the G/I
mode. That load sharing typically takes into account the present
power generating capacity of each fuel cell 18, as provided by
status signals from the fuel cell power plants 18, and apportions
the load accordingly amongst them.
The SMC 31 is typically composed of computers, programmable logic,
sensors, and control circuitry. The combination of the mode signals
M1 and M2, and the information about grid voltage, phase and
frequency provided on lead 10', serve in the SMC 31 to provide, as
outputs, further mode control signals D1 and D2 on lead 33', a
phase lock loop sync signal on lead 33'', and a voltage reference
signal on lead 33'''. A signal bus 33 exchanges these control
signals between the SMC 31 and the PCSs of the several power plants
18. The signal bus 33 also conveys, between the SMC 31 and each of
the PCSs, the several load share status and control signals
collectively represented as lead 33''' to/from the SMC 31. These
signals are used to apportion the load among the fuel cells 18
during load-following operation in the G/I mode. The "load sharing"
algorithm takes into account the present power generating capacity
of each fuel cell 18, as provided by status signals from the fuel
cell power plants 18, and apportions the load accordingly amongst
them.
The grid 10 voltage and current signals sensed by the grid sensing
circuit 37 are also extended to a grid protection relay 26, which
in turn is responsive to the grid voltage and current being in or
out of limits to provide a control signal on lead 28. The lead 28
is connected to the switching gear 12, and the signal thereon
serves to control one or more breaker switches in a manner to
assure the load continues to have power during grid disturbances
and also to protect the static switch, the grid 10, the power
plants 18 and/or the loads 14 in the event of extreme
conditions.
A second controller is the Load Shed Controller (LSC) 34, which is
a programmable logic control comprised of appropriate standard
integrated circuits. The LSC 34 provides high-speed load shed
control in the G/I mode, as will be described below. The LSC 34
receives respective kilowatt (Kw) capacity signals from each of the
power plants 18 (1 through n) via a signal bus 36, here
collectively representative of all "n" of the signals. The
respective Kw capacity signals are typically developed in the
respective PPCs of each power plant 18, pass through the respective
PCSs, and each extend to the LSC 34 via I.O. port 30 as a 4-20 ma
signal via respective pairs, here collectively represented as lead
36. The development of the Kw capacity signals at the PPCs, and
their eventual use in the various controls of the SMS 11, will be
described below in greater detail. Suffice it to say at this
juncture that the Kw capacity signals are a measure of the power
generating capacity of the individual power plants 18, and find use
in load sharing, load shedding, and in the overall control of the
multiple power plants 18 as a unified, or singular, resource in a
utility grid of distributed resources. Further, 2X signals
(possibly 24 in number) are communicated between the LSC 34 and the
X (possibly 12 in number) contactors 1 through X of the contactor
array 13 via discrete signal lines, here represented for simplicity
as a single lead 70. Half of these signals are representative of
the status of the respective contactors, and the other half are
responsible for controlling the opening or closing of the
respective contactors. The LSC 34 also receives an indication, via
lead 71 from the logic associated with the static switch of
switching gear 12, of the mode status, and particularly entry into
the G/I mode. This enables operativeness of the load shedding
function in that mode, and vice versa.
The third controller is the Site Supervisory Controller (SSC) 29,
which provides the operator interface for the power system 8, is
responsible for integrated supervisory control of the system at a
high level, and provides an interface between the customer (or
operator) at the site and the utility. As with the LSC 34, the SSC
29 is a programmable logic control comprised of appropriate
standard integrated circuits programmed to perform the required
functions. A bus extender 38 connects the LSC 34 and the SSU 29
such that the two may be viewed collectively as a unit. The SSC 29
includes six interfaces with the remainder of the power system 8,
as well as with the utility grid.
One of those interfaces is the interconnection of the LSC 34 with
the SSC 29 via the bus extender 38. The LSC 34 communicates the 2X
number of signals associated with contactor array 13 to the SSC 29
approximately every half second such that the SSC 29 has override
capability of the customer load contactors 13 as well as monitoring
the customer load status, when in G/I mode.
Another interface involves the communications between the SSC 29
and the individual power plants 18 via n pairs of Local Operator
Interface (LOI) leads 54', only one being shown connected to the
SSC 29, and the connection with the PPCs of the power plants 18
being represented, for simplicity, as but part of a cumulative,
multiple path, diverse signal communication bus 54. These signals
include those necessary fur the routine supervisory control of the
power plants 18, and are used to obtain data from the power plants
18 for both local display on the Local Human Machine Interface
(HMI) 56 and for use at the utility dispatch Supervisory Control
and Data Acquisition (SCADA) interface on lead 58 from/to the
utility. A panel control 60 includes manual controls for various
annunciators and, particularly, a mode switch input providing
selection between a local operating mode (L) in which the power
plants 18 are controlled individually, and a supervisory mode (S)
in which the several power plants are operated as a unit. When the
mode selector switch from panel control 60 is in the supervisory
mode (S), as depicted in FIG. 1, both the Local HMI 56 and a Remote
HMI 62 are inhibited from issuing control or dispatch commands.
Then, all control and dispatch signals come from the utility's
remote dispatch station (not shown) via the SCADA interface line
58, which is a Modbus remote terminal link comprised of a leased
(dedicated) copper pair. The Remote HMI 62 is connected with a
remote site, such as the power plant 18 manufacturer and/or the
utility, by phone line through a local modem 64, and conducts data
and control commands from and to the Power Plants 18 via leads 54
and 54''' only when the mode selector switch is in the local mode.
The Local HMI 56 conducts data and control commands from and to the
power plants 18 via leads 54 and 54', with the interaction of the
SSC 29, only when the mode selector switch is in the local mode
(L). The connection between the local HMI 56 and the SSC 29
represents a third interface with the SSC 29. Similarly, the Remote
HMI 62 is connected with a remote site, such as the power plant 18
manufacturer and/or the utility, as by a phone line through a local
modem 64, and conducts data and control commands to and from the
power plants 18 via the Local HMI 56, the SSC 29, and the leads 54
and 54' only when the mode selector switch is in the local mode
(L).
A fourth interface with SSC 29 involves the grid protection relay
26 via lead 65. This connection reports the status of grid 10, and
any faults or out of limit conditions therewith, such as current,
voltage, phase or frequency abnormalities, as discerned by grid
sensing unit 37 and applied through the GPR 26.
A fifth interface with the SSC 29 involves the provision of signals
indicative of the power delivery by the several power plants 18, by
means of a utility power meter 66 connected to power bus 15 and
having a signal lead 67 connected to SSC 29, and indicative of the
power delivered to/drawn by the loads 14, by means of a utility
power meter 68 connected to load power bus 39. The power meter 68
is connected to bus 39 intermediate the contactors 13 and the
global bypass 19, and has a signal lead 69 connected to SSC 29. The
power meters 66 and 68 each typically include a potential (voltage)
sensor and a current sensor (neither shown) for cumulatively
determining power. These power readings are used by the SSC 29 and
the LSC 34 for control actions to be hereinafter explained.
The sixth interface involves 2-way communication between the SSC 29
and the switching gear 12, as represented by the lead 72. The SSC
29 may provide discrete signals to the static switch control and to
selected breaker switches to allow it to select the operating mode
of the SMS 11 if necessary. Similarly, those switches return
respective status signals to the SSC 29. The SSC 29 may provide an
"enable" signal to the static switch, and when present allows the
switch to operate autonomously based on the condition of grid 10 at
the time. When the signal is "disabled", it forces the static
switch to open and cause power system 8 to operate in the G/I
mode.
A local diagnostic terminal 73 is connected selectively through an
"n-way" switch 74 and leads 54'' and 54, to the individual ones of
the n-number of power plants 18 for obtaining diagnostic data. Also
included is a remote diagnostic terminal (RDT) 61 connected through
an "n-way" phone line sharer 63 to the individual n-number of power
plants 18, via leads 54 and 54''', for similarly obtaining
diagnostic data.
Reference is now made to FIG. 2, which depicts a generalized
functional schematic block diagram of the development, in the PPC
of a respective power plant 18, of a Kw capacity signal (Kw
Capacity) indicative of the present power generating capacity of
the respective fuel cell power plant 18. This signal is then used,
both on an individual plant basis and on a cumulative power system
8 basis, to enable and facilitate remote dispatch of power
requirements by the utility in the G/C mode, as well as load
sharing and load shedding capabilities in the G/I mode. A Kw rating
value (KwRATING) is initially assigned to a respective fuel cell
power plant 18, as represented on input lead 76 to an Event Table
77. The KwRATING signal has a normal default value of 200 Kw, which
assumes the fuel cell and plant are operating, or operable, at full
capacity. This value may be adjusted by an operator or the
manufacturer to reflect a lesser value in view of predetermined
circumstances which may degrade performance of the plant by a
prescribed amount. The Event Table 77 contains several power
foldback values, each of which correspond with one or more
"abnormal" conditions in the operation of the fuel cell F.C.
portion of the power plant 18. For instance, for conditions of low
steam to fuel ratio in the fuel cell system, the power rating may
be folded back to 170 Kw, and for conditions such as inability to
satisfy fuel demand, insufficient make-up water, excessive fuel
cell cabinet temperature, etc., the foldback may be greater, to a
Kw rating of only 75 Kw. These foldback power values (and others)
are depicted on the scale appearing at the top of table 77, whereas
in fact the table serves to correlate a sensed condition with a
predetermined foldback power rating and provide as an output, a
signal on lead 78 which is representative of a folded back power
rating. This signal is applied to a lesser select function 79,
which has as its other input the initial KwRATING value from lead
76. The lesser power value of the signals on leads 76 and 78 is
then provided as the output on lead 80. A further possible power
foldback may be made at the summer 81, which receives a (+) input
from lead 80 and may receive a (-) input on lead 82. The lead 82
contains any power foldback magnitude resulting from a sensed
abnormality in the water treatment system for the fuel cell, and
that foldback magnitude is variable and may range from a power
decrease of as little as 0 Kw to as much as 190 Kw. In this
instance, the value appearing on lead 80 will be reduced by the
value appearing on the lead 82, to provide a resultant output on
lead 83. The value on lead 83 may also, or further, be folded back,
or overridden if the fuel cell water treatment system is placed in
a maintenance mode. This potential override results when a water
treatment maintenance mode signal 84 is applied to a Table 85,
which Table is scheduled to provide, as an output on lead 86,
either the value on lead 83 if the water treatment is operating
normally or a preset folded back value of only 10 Kw if the mode
signal on 84 indicates the maintenance mode. The value on lead 86
is compared with that on lead 83 at the lesser select function 87,
and the lesser value is then provided as the Kw Capacity signal on
lead 88. Thus it will be realized that under normal operating
circumstances and conditions, the Kw Capacity signal may be as
large as 200 Kw; whereas if one or more of the other conditions
arise or exist, the rating will be folded back to a value between
200 kw and 10 kw, accordingly. This, then, represents the power
generating capacity of that power plant 18 at that moment. The
various contributing parameters are monitored at least as
frequently as 0.5 sec. such that the Kw Capacity signal may be
updated and sent every 0.5 seconds.
Referring further to FIG. 2, a Set Power value (designated 112 in
FIG. 3 below) is applied to lead 90, and is the result, for a
single power plant, of the total power dispatch signal (designated
97 in FIG. 3 below). The total dispatch is apportioned among the
multiple power plants in accordance with the algorithm to be
described with respect to FIG. 3, and the resulting Set Power is
indicative of a desired or commanded level of power output from the
respective single ones of the power plants 18. This total dispatch
value may be set by the utility via the SCADA input 58 to SSC 29,
and is conditioned by the algorithm depicted in FIG. 3 to provide
the resultant Set Power value. This Set Power value on lead 90 is
compared with the Kw Capacity value on lead 88 at lesser select
function 91, and the lesser of the two is then available as the
control signal DISPKW to command the level of power to be
dispatched by that power plant 18. The output of lesser select 91
may be extended through GIC ramp logic 92, such that the DISPKW
signal on lead 93 will change levels at a predetermined rate so as
to insure relatively smooth power transitions, particularly when
transitioning between G/C and G/I modes. Each Kw Capacity signal is
passed through the PCS of a power plant and, from a current
transducer in the PCS, is passed to LSC 34 via lead 36. Each DISPKW
signal on a lead 93 represents a command signal sent from a
respective PPC to a respective PCS for regulating the Kw power
output of the respective power plant 18.
Referring to FIG. 3, there is a generalized functional schematic
block diagram of logic, typically in the SSC 29, that determines
the power dispatch loading of the multiple (1 through n) power
plants 18 when operating in the G/C mode. The Kw Capacity signals
for/from each of the n fuel cell power plants 18 are cumulatively
applied as inputs to a summer 94 to provide a Total Kw Capacity
signal as the output on lead 95. This signal represents the total
power generating capacity of the power system 8 at that moment. The
Total Kw capacity signal is provided as one input to a lesser
select function 96, with another input being a UTILITY DISPATCH
signal on lead 97. The UTILITY DISPATCH signal may be derived from
a demand signal received from the utility via SCADA line 58. The
output of the lesser select 96 appears on line 98, and is thus the
ACTUAL DISPATCH value. In other words, the actual dispatch value is
the lesser of those two input values, and can never be more than
the Total Kw Capacity. The ACTUAL DISPATCH value is then ratioed
with, or divided by, the Total Kw Capacity value in the division
function block 99 to provide an output value represented on lead
100. In the event the UTILITY DISPATCH value is equal to or greater
than the Total Kw Capacity value, the output 100 will be unity
(one), whereas if the UTILITY DISPATCH request is less, then the
output 100 will have some fractional value less than one. This
value on line 100 may be deemed a weighting, or pro rating, factor.
It is applied as an input to each of n multiplier function blocks
110, which function blocks have the Kw Capacity value for that
respective power plant as their other input. The products of these
multiplication functions are the respective SET POWER signal values
appearing as outputs on lines 112, and used as the SET POWER value
on line 90 in FIG. 2. In this way, the SET POWER demand signal for
each power plant 18 (1 through n), is the ratioed amount of that
plant's Kw capacity, and can never be greater than its capacity. In
the instances when the UTILITY DISPATCH value is equal to or
greater than the Total Kw Capacity, each plant will be loaded to
its present maximum capacity. Conversely, if the ratio is less than
unity, each plant will be loaded to that ratioed amount of its
present capacity.
An alternative to the algorithm depicted with respect to FIG. 3 is
one which initially assumes that all power plants have equal
capacity and thus, divides the UTILITY DISPATCH request value by
the number of fuel cell power plants (n) to obtain an initial "per
power plant" dispatch value. The relevant logic then compares the
Kw Capacity signal for the first power plant 18 (#1) with the
initial "per power plant" dispatch value and, if sufficient
capacity exists, the requested value is put in that power plant's
power dispatch register. The same is done for the remaining fuel
cell power plants (#2 through n). If a particular fuel cell power
plant 18 is limited and can not supply the full requested "per
power plant" dispatch value, then it is loaded to its power-limited
capacity and the remainder is stored in an overflow register or the
like. When all fuel cells 18 have been polled and loaded based on
their respective kilowatt generating capacities, then the Kw amount
accumulated and stored in the overflow register is distributed
amongst the fuel cells 18 with remaining, or extra, power
generating capacity, using the same logic as described above. This
process continues iteratively until either the entire dispatch
request has been assigned to the power plants 18 or no additional
capacity remains for the overflow dispatch request. If the latter
occurs, an alarm message is sent to the utility's dispatch center
via line 58, stating that the power request exceeds the current
generating capacity of the site.
During operation of the site-based power system 8 in the G/C mode,
not only is the total capacity of the n fuel cell power plants 18
available to supply the demands of the local customer loads 14, but
the nominally "infinite" resource of the utility grid 10 is also
available. However, when operating in the G/I mode, the maximum
power available is that represented by the Total Kw Capacity value
95 depicted in FIG. 3. In such instance, if the actual total power
demand of the collective loads 14 (L.sub.1, L.sub.2, . . L.sub.x)
is greater than the Total Kw Capacity value, as because the latter
is reduced because of power "foldbacks" at the power plants 18,
some administrative action must be taken. According to an aspect of
the invention, the customer loads 14 are arranged, or identified,
according to a schedule of priorities. In the most refined
instance, each of the total X number of loads has its own different
relative priority. Alternatively, the loads 14 may be grouped, as
for instance in high, medium, and low priority groups.
Then, in one embodiment, the total power demand of the loads 14, as
indicated by the signal 69 from Utility Power Meter 68, is conveyed
to SSC 29 where it is compared with the Total Kw Capacity signal 95
(of FIG. 3) to determine whether or not there is sufficient
capacity to meet the instant demand of the loads. If there is, then
that demand is met according to the established system load-sharing
algorithm in SMC 31. However, if that comparison, by subtraction or
ratio or other convenient means, indicates that the instant load
demand is greater than the Total Kw Capacity, a load shedding
condition arises. This is done in accordance with the previously
determined schedule of priorities, by disconnecting (shedding)
certain ones, or groups, of the loads 14 (L.sub.1, L.sub.2, . . .
L.sub.x) by selective actuation (opening) of the respective
individual load contactors 13 (1, 2, . . . X) by the control
signals represented by lead 70 between the LSC 34 and the
contactors 13. The LSC 34, in conjunction with SSC 29, will then
use the load priority schedule to actuate (open) those contactors
13 required to disconnect the lower priority loads and retain
connected the more critical, higher priority loads. In one
configuration, the loads can be shed sequentially by priority
through an iterative process until the demand can be met by the
Total Kw Capacity. In another, more sophisticated, arrangement, the
instant demand of the load associated with each separate contactor
13 (1, 2, . . . X) might be determined by associating power meters
with each contactor and using the information to compute, according
to the priority schedule, which loads to disconnect in a single
disconnection action. Of course, with either configuration, because
the usage pattern of the loads 14 may be constantly changing as
loads are "turned on and off" by the user, it is necessary to
continually repeat this analysis and control action in the G/I mode
to avoid overloading. When a power foldback condition is removed
and/or certain higher priority loads are removed or "turned off",
some or all of the lower priority loads previously shed may be
reconnected to the load power line 39. In this way, the most
critical customer loads always have power.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with
respect to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be
understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and
various other changes, omissions and additions may be made without
departing the spirit and scope of the invention. For instance, the
logic functions depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3, as well as the many
other logic functions performed by the invention, may be done with
dedicated logic or via programmable logic circuitry, with the
latter in the extreme instance being performed via one or more
appropriately programmed computers.
* * * * *