Shoe
Shyllon
U.S. patent number D885,019 [Application Number D/554,282] was granted by the patent office on 2020-05-26 for shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Tamimu A. Shyllon.
| United States Patent | D885,019 |
| Shyllon | May 26, 2020 |
Shoe
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Shyllon; Tamimu A. (Portland, OR) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/554,282 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | February 10, 2016 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/947; D2/960 |
| Current International Class: | 0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,905,906,907,908,910,911,912,943,944,945,946,947,969,972,951,953,960,968 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D342599 | December 1993 | Luke |
| D345458 | March 1994 | Lacoraza |
| D349394 | August 1994 | Hatfield |
| D350222 | September 1994 | Hase |
| D381492 | July 1997 | Nakano |
| D410691 | June 1999 | Boyer |
| D421176 | February 2000 | Matis |
| D438697 | March 2001 | Matis |
| D447620 | September 2001 | Matis |
| D447860 | September 2001 | Matis |
| D449425 | October 2001 | Sasaki |
| D449922 | November 2001 | Pollastrelli |
| D457296 | May 2002 | Burt |
| D550933 | September 2007 | Hulbert |
| D568586 | May 2008 | Dolce |
| D576380 | September 2008 | Morris |
| D576381 | September 2008 | Weber |
| 7441348 | October 2008 | Dawson |
| D628369 | December 2010 | Teteriatnikov |
| D632876 | February 2011 | Choi |
| D656715 | April 2012 | Katz |
| D657941 | April 2012 | Bramani |
| D662695 | July 2012 | McVicker |
| D665562 | August 2012 | Di Nucci |
| D701680 | April 2014 | Della Valle |
| D702023 | April 2014 | Jacobs |
| D702024 | April 2014 | Della Valle |
| D702423 | April 2014 | Della Valle |
| D712126 | September 2014 | Kuerbis |
| D717029 | November 2014 | Young |
| D725356 | March 2015 | Miner |
| D753376 | April 2016 | Birkinhead |
| D760482 | July 2016 | Siegel |
| D768968 | October 2016 | Howe |
| D776413 | January 2017 | Mokos |
| D782165 | March 2017 | Slimane |
| D784667 | April 2017 | Wright |
| D784668 | April 2017 | Pauk |
| D791450 | July 2017 | Birkinhead |
| D793677 | August 2017 | Slimane |
| D796160 | September 2017 | Guichot |
| D800430 | October 2017 | Moller Hansen |
| D801650 | November 2017 | Nykreim |
| D803532 | November 2017 | Scott |
| D810408 | February 2018 | Hernandez |
| D814155 | April 2018 | Hernandez |
| D829420 | October 2018 | McWee |
| D829421 | October 2018 | Pope |
| D829422 | October 2018 | Rathburn |
| 2012/0210606 | August 2012 | Gheorghian |
| 2017/0295886 | October 2017 | Davis |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe showing my new design; and,
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the photographic area define the bounds of the claimed design and form no part thereof. The broken lines depicting the remainder of the shoe show features that form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
D00000
D00001
D00002
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 