Case for electronic communications device

Description

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a case for electronic communications device showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 9 is a rear perspective view thereof showing the support leg in an extended position;

FIG. 10 is an exploded front perspective view thereof, showing the components of the case separated for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 11 is an exploded rear perspective view thereof, showing the components of the case separated for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 12 is a front perspective view of the outer frame component of the case shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 14 is a front perspective view of the inner shell component of the case shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 15 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 16 is a front perspective view of the support leg component of the case shown separately for clarity of disclosure; and,

FIG. 17 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure.

Although the case for electronic communications device, in which the claimed design is embodied, consists of an inner shell, an outer frame, and a support leg, the claim is directed to the ornamental appearance of the case for electronic communications device in its entirety and does not extend to the ornamental appearance of each of the individual components of the case for electronic communications device.

The broken lines throughout the drawing figures depict portions of the case for electronic communications device that form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines and regions bounded by broken lines form no part of the claimed design.

The interior of the case shown in FIGS. 1, 3, 10 and 14 (specifically, that region within the innermost of the solid lines around the outer edge of the interior cavity of the case) forms no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a case for electronic communications device, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Kim; Dae-Young (Seoul, KR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD. Seoul N/A KR
Assignee:	SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD. (Seoul, KR)
Appl. No.:	D/576,513
Filed:	September 2, 2016

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/250
Current International Class:	1403
Field of Search:	;D14/238.1,440,203.3-203.7,217,240,447,250,251-253,248 ;D3/201,218,247,269,273,301,303 ;D13/103,107-108,119

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

7301759	November 2007	Hslung
D559230	January 2008	Griffin
D574819	August 2008	Andre
D583572	December 2008	Zhai
D590386	April 2009	Leith
D619361	July 2010	Andre
D622716	August 2010	Andre
D632685	February 2011	Richardson
D634741	March 2011	Richardson
D642169	July 2011	Andre
D662923	July 2012	Piedra
D663263	July 2012	Gupta
D663294	July 2012	Buxton
8243428	August 2012	Fu
8249679	August 2012	Cui
D669458	October 2012	Wilson
D679271	April 2013	Lin
8430240	April 2013	Kim
8457701	June 2013	Diebel
D690305	September 2013	Wen
8655422	February 2014	Stiehl
D706254	June 2014	Chang
D710795	August 2014	Gupta
D714276	September 2014	Hu
8879245	November 2014	Kim
8897033	November 2014	Slipy
D718755	December 2014	To
D719559	December 2014	Dukerschein
8922996	December 2014	Yeh
D721360	January 2015	Laffon de Mazieres
9004275	April 2015	Lee
D732543	June 2015	Westrup et al.
D733693	July 2015	Wang
D743389	November 2015	Akana
9185813	November 2015	Diebel
D744993	December 2015	Diebel
D746275	December 2015	Mohammad
9237211	January 2016	Tabe
D749567	February 2016	Lee
9247795	February 2016	Kim
9295174	March 2016	Witter
9300768	March 2016	Dining
9301414	March 2016	Chao
D754652	April 2016	Roberts
9307096	April 2016	Hsu
D761239	July 2016	Kim
D763239	August 2016	Chan
D763841	August 2016	Kim
9432074	August 2016	Fathollahi
D765633	September 2016	Northrup
D765635	September 2016	Chang
D765644	September 2016	Witter
D772210	November 2016	Igarashi
D775614	January 2017	Kim
D775619	January 2017	Tien
D776104	January 2017	Tien
D781835	March 2017	Kim et al.
D781836	March 2017	Kim et al.
D781839	March 2017	Kim et al.
D781840	March 2017	Kim et al.
D782456	March 2017	Park et al.
D782457	March 2017	Park et al.
D783585	April 2017	Park
D783602	April 2017	Akana et al.
D784310	April 2017	Lee et al.
D784324	April 2017	Akana et al.
D786232	May 2017	Kim
D787490	May 2017	Akana et al.
9641212	May 2017	Tien et al.
9660683	May 2017	Tien
D789346	June 2017	Akana et al.
2011/0164358	July 2011	Duan
2012/0018325	January 2012	Kim
2012/0168577	July 2012	Cheng
2013/0077211	March 2013	Wang
2014/0085777	March 2014	Yeh
2016/0142522	May 2016	Kim
2017/0033824	February 2017	Tien
2017/0055660	March 2017	Tien

Primary Examiner: Wright; Carla Jobe
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Chae; Heedong Lucem, PC