Shoe upper
Bell , et al. August 1, 2
U.S. patent number D793,067 [Application Number D/560,610] was granted by the patent office on 2017-08-01 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Thomas G. Bell, TaeYong Lee.
| United States Patent | D793,067 |
| Bell , et al. | August 1, 2017 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bell; Thomas G. (Portland, OR), Lee; TaeYong (Sherwood, OR) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/560,610 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | April 8, 2016 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29558353 | Mar 16, 2016 | ||||
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,906-908,944,969,971-974 ;D5/47,49,52 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D461304 | August 2002 | Clegg |
| D636592 | April 2011 | Dekovic |
| D668441 | October 2012 | Shaffer |
| D668858 | October 2012 | Shaffer |
| D673358 | January 2013 | Miner |
| D683533 | June 2013 | Williams, Jr. |
| D684761 | June 2013 | Williams, Jr. |
| D694509 | December 2013 | Miner |
| D707027 | June 2014 | Shaffer |
| D707951 | July 2014 | McCullagh |
| D710585 | August 2014 | Ho et al. |
| D710590 | August 2014 | Young |
| D752332 | March 2016 | Williams, Jr. |
| D771927 | November 2016 | Rasmussen |
| D775808 | January 2017 | Little |
| D781556 | March 2017 | Nethongkome |
Other References
|
Nike Revolutionizes Speed With New Mercurial Superfly [online], [retrieved Dec. 19, 2016] retrieved from Internet <URL: <http://news.nike.com/news/nike-revolutionizes-speed-with-new-mercuria- l-superfly/>; 12 color sheets, Dated Apr. 25, 2014. cited by applicant . A Timeline of Nike Mercurial Boots [online], [retrieved Dec. 12, 2016] retrieved from internet <URL: <http://news.nike.com/news/a-timeline-of-nike-mercurial-boots/>; 15 color sheets, Dated Jun. 30, 2014. cited by applicant . Mercurial Superfly CR7 Shines Bright for Cristiano Ronaldo [online], [retrieved Dec. 19, 2016] retrieved from internet <URL: <http://news.nike.com/news/new-mercurial-superfly-cr7-shines-bright/&g- t;; 12 color sheets, Dated Oct. 23, 2014. cited by applicant . More With Less: The Nike Roshe Flyknit [online], [retrieved Dec. 19, 2016] retrieved from internet <URL: <http://news.nike.com/news/less-but-better-the-nike-roshe-flyknit-2/&g- t;; 10 color sheets, Dated Jan. 26, 2015. cited by applicant. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a photographic front perspective view of a shoe upper showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a photographic side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a photographic top view thereof.
The photographic area is claimed. The broken lines immediately adjacent to the photographic area represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 