Shoe upper
Dekovic April 26, 2
U.S. patent number D636,592 [Application Number D/384,884] was granted by the patent office on 2011-04-26 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Denis Dekovic.
| United States Patent | D636,592 |
| Dekovic | April 26, 2011 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Dekovic; Denis (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/384,884 |
| Filed: | February 4, 2011 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,906-908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45-49,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D99353 | April 1936 | Kyros |
| D330967 | November 1992 | Aveni et al. |
| D385403 | October 1997 | Kuerbis |
| D413196 | August 1999 | Hatfield |
| D430725 | September 2000 | McDowell |
| D446640 | August 2001 | Estey |
| D490602 | June 2004 | Dombrow |
| D498910 | November 2004 | Link |
| D510475 | October 2005 | Hlavacs |
| D521227 | May 2006 | Mermet |
| D523222 | June 2006 | Savage |
| D528285 | September 2006 | Hlavacs |
| D528764 | September 2006 | Clancy |
| D529273 | October 2006 | Lotti |
| D544691 | June 2007 | Mueller |
| D544692 | June 2007 | Kuerbis |
| D550946 | September 2007 | Lotti |
| D551844 | October 2007 | Hlavacs |
| D574590 | August 2008 | Maejima |
| D595484 | July 2009 | Purdom et al. |
| D614389 | April 2010 | Petrie |
| D623840 | September 2010 | Hui |
| D624744 | October 2010 | Yi |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 1991, p. 78, published Jun. 1990. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 1996, p. 129, published Aug. 1995. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 1997, p. 188, published Jun. 1996. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 1997, p. 53, published Mar. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 1998, p. 250, published Sep. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 1998, p. W12, published Feb. 1998. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 1999, p. M150, M57, W4, published Sep. 1998. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 1999, p. W 58, M9, published Nov. 1998. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Fall 1999, p. 52, 5, 4, published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Holiday 1999, p. W113, M58, W25, W23, M12, published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Spring 2000, p. 28, 36, published Jul. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Fall 2000, p. 16, published Nov. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Late Spring 2001, p. 71, published Sep. 2000. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe upper are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 