Rear bumper for automobiles
Kawaguchi December 6, 2
U.S. patent number D773,355 [Application Number D/535,953] was granted by the patent office on 2016-12-06 for rear bumper for automobiles. This patent grant is currently assigned to HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.. The grantee listed for this patent is HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.. Invention is credited to Shogo Kawaguchi.
| United States Patent | D773,355 |
| Kawaguchi | December 6, 2016 |
Rear bumper for automobiles
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a rear bumper for automobiles, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kawaguchi; Shogo (Wako, JP) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. (Tokyo,
JP) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/535,953 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | August 12, 2015 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Feb 13, 2015 [JP] | 2015-002872 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/169 |
| Current International Class: | 1208 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/86-92,163-172 ;293/102-155 ;296/35.2,193.09,193.1,203.02 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D447101 | August 2001 | Maniwa |
| D450013 | November 2001 | Kato |
| D508434 | August 2005 | Chapman |
| D508880 | August 2005 | Minami |
| D516968 | March 2006 | Sakae |
| D520911 | May 2006 | Sugimoto |
| D566619 | April 2008 | Bushell |
| D578448 | October 2008 | Sawai |
| D582325 | December 2008 | Schell |
| D605084 | December 2009 | Szavits |
| D606911 | December 2009 | Sahs |
| D617684 | June 2010 | Nagura et al. |
| D617701 | June 2010 | Murakawa |
| D633008 | February 2011 | Nakamura |
| D639215 | June 2011 | Faghihzadeh |
| D640172 | June 2011 | Furst |
| D640616 | June 2011 | Schell |
| D647428 | October 2011 | Ohhashi |
| D647831 | November 2011 | Murakawa |
| D690631 | October 2013 | Kazama |
| D735624 | August 2015 | Sperling |
| D1388635 | May 2010 | JP | |||
| D1394446 | Aug 2010 | JP | |||
Other References
|
Loh, Edward. "2011 Honda CR-Z." Motortrend.com. Jan. 7, 2010. Accessed Jul. 18, 2016. Available online at URL: <http://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-z/2011/2011-honda-cr-z-hybrid- />. cited by examiner . Sanchez, Karla. "TRD offers 2014 Lexus IS F Sport Upgrade in Japan." Motortrend.com. May 20, 2013. Accessed Jul. 21, 2016. Available online at URL: <http://www.motortrend.com/news/trd-offers-2014-lexus-is-f-sport-- upgrade-in-japan-368885/>. cited by examiner . Official Communication dated Sep. 9, 2015, issued in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-002872 (1 page). cited by applicant. |
Primary Examiner: Brooks; Cathron
Assistant Examiner: McLean; Christian P
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a rear bumper for automobiles;
FIG. 2 is a plan view of the rear bumper for automobiles;
FIG. 3 is a right side view of the rear bumper for automobiles;
FIG. 4 is a front perspective view of the rear bumper for automobiles, as seen from the left upper side; and,
FIG. 5 is a rear perspective view of the rear bumper for automobiles, as seen from the right upper side.
The broken lines illustrate the environment of the design and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 