Pet food supplement package
Kerr , et al. December 27, 2
U.S. patent number D651,095 [Application Number D/392,480] was granted by the patent office on 2011-12-27 for pet food supplement package. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to George Scott Kerr, Gary J. Kohlman, David William Schuller, Lawrence Andrew Schumacher, Gregory Dean Sunvold, Robbert H. Ter Haar.
| United States Patent | D651,095 |
| Kerr , et al. | December 27, 2011 |
Pet food supplement package
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a pet food supplement package, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kerr; George Scott (Mason, OH), Sunvold; Gregory Dean (Lewisburg, OH), Schumacher; Lawrence Andrew (Trenton, OH), Schuller; David William (Lebanon, OH), Ter Haar; Robbert H. (Dayton, OH), Kohlman; Gary J. (Terrace Park, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | D/392,480 |
| Filed: | May 23, 2011 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29381568 | Dec 21, 2010 | D640564 | |||
| 29361951 | May 18, 2010 | D631757 | |||
| 29346244 | Oct 29, 2009 | ||||
| 29320852 | Jul 7, 2008 | D605527 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/607; D9/732 |
| Current International Class: | 0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/600,601,607,732,756,758-761 ;206/457-458,462,528,531,539 ;215/400 ;D7/672,675-676 ;D15/90 ;D1/107 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2191921 | February 1940 | Roscoe |
| 3331495 | July 1967 | Erich et al. |
| 3793135 | February 1974 | Monia |
| 4124953 | November 1978 | Patton |
| D257126 | September 1980 | Johnson |
| D263681 | April 1982 | Parr |
| D263682 | April 1982 | Urciuoli |
| D272128 | January 1984 | Parmentier |
| D272232 | January 1984 | Parmentier |
| D272233 | January 1984 | Parmentier |
| D272317 | January 1984 | Parmentier |
| D275366 | September 1984 | Maxwell |
| D289854 | May 1987 | Lane et al. |
| 4974729 | December 1990 | Steinnagel |
| D323109 | January 1992 | Kalvelage |
| 5109984 | May 1992 | Romick |
| D359900 | July 1995 | Hawthorne |
| D370625 | June 1996 | Kelsey et al. |
| D380961 | July 1997 | Schnack |
| D397700 | September 1998 | Rodgers |
| D421203 | February 2000 | Darvishi |
| D421900 | March 2000 | Eneroth et al. |
| D427517 | July 2000 | Marcks |
| D440871 | April 2001 | Lo |
| D445518 | July 2001 | Warden |
| D455953 | April 2002 | Assargren et al. |
| D496374 | September 2004 | Zimmerman |
| D506680 | June 2005 | Saelzer |
| D511977 | November 2005 | Saelzer |
| D513019 | December 2005 | Lion et al. |
| D525879 | August 2006 | Ueda et al. |
| D548110 | August 2007 | Pugh |
| D572141 | July 2008 | Slabaugh |
| D575148 | August 2008 | Sagel |
| 7431160 | October 2008 | Drought et al. |
| D591478 | May 2009 | Slusarczyk et al. |
| 2002/0104773 | August 2002 | Kalvelage et al. |
| 2004/0026293 | February 2004 | Hughes |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Foust; Amy M. Borgman; Adam W.
Description
The sole FIGURE is a perspective view of a pet food supplement package embodying a new design.
The broken lines shown in the drawings are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 