Portion of a workspace

Martin , et al. December 20, 2

Patent Grant D650614

U.S. patent number D650,614 [Application Number D/362,958] was granted by the patent office on 2011-12-20 for portion of a workspace. This patent grant is currently assigned to Steelcase Inc.. Invention is credited to David Eberlein, Kirt Martin.


United States Patent D650,614
Martin ,   et al. December 20, 2011

Portion of a workspace

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a portion of a workspace, as shown and described.
Inventors: Martin; Kirt (Alto, MI), Eberlein; David (Hudsonville, MI)
Assignee: Steelcase Inc. (Grand Rapids, MI)
Appl. No.: D/362,958
Filed: June 2, 2010

Current U.S. Class: D6/702
Current International Class: 0603
Field of Search: ;D6/480-489,429-431,495-499.422,423 ;108/150,155,156,157.1,161 ;248/188,188.1,188.8

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
543053 July 1895 Ripking
0983903 February 1911 Horton
2110466 March 1938 Louis
2903316 September 1959 Schmidt
3170742 February 1965 Berkowitz
D210606 March 1968 Hamilton
3570682 March 1971 Elliott
D221238 July 1971 Gianfagna
3680942 August 1972 Davis
3827377 August 1974 Aughtry, Jr.
3892189 July 1975 Killam
3913498 October 1975 Hall et al.
4138952 February 1979 Hodson
4297952 November 1981 Zagaroli
4422385 December 1983 Rutsche et al.
4645161 February 1987 Collins
4734826 March 1988 Wilson
4761931 August 1988 Schrunk
4762072 August 1988 Boundy et al.
4951782 August 1990 Hanson
D312541 December 1990 Wright
D322133 December 1991 Corneau et al.
5078055 January 1992 Bellini et al.
5103741 April 1992 Grund et al.
5220871 June 1993 Grund et al.
5322022 June 1994 Burkholder
5323695 June 1994 Borgman et al.
5341749 August 1994 Noakes
5469794 November 1995 Laderoute et al.
D371703 July 1996 Muller-Deisig et al.
D379278 May 1997 Zeinfeld et al.
D379887 June 1997 Muller-Deisig et al.
5662298 September 1997 Collins
5754995 May 1998 Behrendt
5881500 March 1999 Latino et al.
6000343 December 1999 Laney
6059071 May 2000 Appezzato
6129180 October 2000 Brady
6161486 December 2000 Boots
6283043 September 2001 Stern et al.
6302035 October 2001 Frenkler et al.
6336414 January 2002 Stewart et al.
D460639 July 2002 Crinion
D467453 December 2002 Kwon
6725784 April 2004 Grinion
D510492 October 2005 Sakurai et al.
D526811 August 2006 Nicoletti
7370097 May 2008 Leong
D585218 January 2009 Hamilton et al.
D604063 November 2009 Oshinomi et al.
7703398 April 2010 Brauning
D641186 July 2011 Martin et al.
2005/0115768 June 2005 Frey
2005/0263041 December 2005 Mueller et al.
2006/0042520 March 2006 Stevens et al.
2006/0162626 July 2006 Brauning et al.
2008/0224580 September 2008 Gibbs et al.
2008/0295745 December 2008 Hamilton et al.
2009/0042428 February 2009 Henriott et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
19733435 Apr 1999 DE
2004-275314 Oct 2004 JP
WO 2004/021830 Mar 2004 WO
2005-001219 Jan 2005 WO

Other References

US. Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,943, dated May 18, 2011. cited by other .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,944, filed Jun. 2, 2010. cited by other .
U.S. Office Action (Election) for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,944, dated Jun. 8, 2011. cited by other .
Response to U.S. Office Action (Election) for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,944, dated Aug. 8, 2011. cited by other .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,948, filed Jun. 2, 2010. cited by other .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,952, dated Jun. 2, 2010. . cited by other .
U.S. Patent Office Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,952, dated Jul. 13, 2011. cited by other .
Response to U.S. Patent Office Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,952, dated Aug. 26, 2011. cited by other .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,955, filed Jun. 2, 2010. cited by other .
U.S. Office Action (Election) for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,955, dated Jun. 8, 2011. cited by other .
Response to U.S. Office Action (Election) for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,955, dated Aug. 8, 2011. cited by other .
U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,963, filed Jun. 2, 2010. cited by other .
U.S. Patent Office Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,963, dated Jul. 13, 2011. cited by other .
Response to U.S. Patent Office Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 29/362,963, dated Aug. 30, 2011. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Seeger; Janice
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Quarles & Brady LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a left, top, front perspective view of a portion of a workspace embodying our new design;

FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof, the right side elevational view thereof being a mirror image of the left side shown;

FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is bottom plan view thereof.

The broken line representations in the figures are for the purpose of illustration only, and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed