Surface protection mat

Wright December 28, 2

Patent Grant D629636

U.S. patent number D629,636 [Application Number D/359,282] was granted by the patent office on 2010-12-28 for surface protection mat. Invention is credited to Rickie J. Wright.


United States Patent D629,636
Wright December 28, 2010

Surface protection mat

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for surface protection mat, as shown and described.
Inventors: Wright; Rickie J. (Canton, MI)
Family ID: 39969809
Appl. No.: D/359,282
Filed: April 8, 2010

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
12175964 Jul 18, 2008
11451706 Jun 13, 2006 7597949

Current U.S. Class: D6/582
Current CPC Class: A47G27/0225 20130101; B32B7/02 20130101; B32B3/10 20130101; A47G27/0206 20130101; A47L23/266 20130101; Y10T428/24165 20150115
Current International Class: 0611
Field of Search: ;D6/582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592 ;4/251.1,251.2,254 ;15/215,216,217 ;428/41.7,116 ;D7/624.1 ;D30/161 ;D5/62 ;D12/203

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
3488081 January 1970 Nolen
4285075 August 1981 Nelson
4328275 May 1982 Vargo
4439474 March 1984 Sagel
4484661 November 1984 Evenson
4609580 September 1986 Rockett et al.
4798754 January 1989 Tomek
4822669 April 1989 Roga
4826030 May 1989 Valley
5018235 May 1991 Stamatiou et al.
5028468 July 1991 Taylor
5080956 January 1992 Smith
5114774 May 1992 Maxim, Jr.
5128189 July 1992 Bartlett
5270089 December 1993 Alston et al.
5383570 January 1995 Gordon
5506040 April 1996 Cordani
5549945 August 1996 Lind
5613332 March 1997 Saylor, Jr.
D394037 May 1998 Mauffette
D402841 December 1998 Dobbs
D409427 May 1999 Ford et al.
5916658 June 1999 Mohr
D421950 March 2000 Lu
D428293 July 2000 Williams
6295658 October 2001 Jenkins
6446275 September 2002 Wright et al.
6673409 January 2004 Wheatley
D486341 February 2004 Ruhl et al.
D493322 July 2004 Juliano
D493323 July 2004 Juliano
D493999 August 2004 Ruhl et al.
D497072 October 2004 Suero, Jr.
D497277 October 2004 Ruhl et al.
6875494 April 2005 Burns et al.
D544282 June 2007 Hart et al.
7597949 October 2009 Wright
2006/0029773 February 2006 Waterman et al.
2008/0280095 November 2008 Wright

Other References

US. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Defendant Consolidated Industrial Corp.'s Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment of Pleadings, or in the Alternative, Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment, on Court II - Lanham Act Violations - Unfair Compeitition and False Representation; dated Feb. 20, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Defendant Consolidated Industrial Corp.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, Cross-Claim and Counterclaim, dated Mar. 5, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand; dated Mar. 6, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend; dated Mar. 24, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Defendant Rick Wright's Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand; dated Jun. 26, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Judgement; dated Aug. 25, 2003. cited by other .
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 03-70229, entitled Golden Eagle USA, LLC v. Consolidated Industrial Corp. et al. Opinion and Order; dated Aug. 25, 2003. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Spear; Robert M
Assistant Examiner: Lohr; Barbara B
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a top view showing a central fluid-funneling area bounded by a peripheral border;

FIG. 2 is a bottom view;

FIG. 3 is a front view, the rear view being identical;

FIG. 4 is a side view; and,

FIG. 5 is an oblique view depicting a portion of the fluid-funneling area of FIG. 1.

The broken lines in the drawings are for environmental purposes and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed