Tire

Maxwell , et al. July 14, 2

Patent Grant D596108

U.S. patent number D596,108 [Application Number D/329,534] was granted by the patent office on 2009-07-14 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Charles Joseph Ashton, Janine Victoria Cowell, Mark Allen Grund, Lisa Michelle Hanna, Shannon Joseph Hughes, Paul Bryan Maxwell.


United States Patent D596,108
Maxwell ,   et al. July 14, 2009

Tire

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a tire, as shown and described.
Inventors: Maxwell; Paul Bryan (Kent, OH), Cowell; Janine Victoria (Blacksburg, VA), Hughes; Shannon Joseph (Rootstown, OH), Ashton; Charles Joseph (Cuyahoga Falls, OH), Hanna; Lisa Michelle (Atwater, OH), Grund; Mark Allen (Tallmadge, OH)
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Akron, OH)
Appl. No.: D/329,534
Filed: December 17, 2008

Current U.S. Class: D12/553
Current International Class: 1215
Field of Search: ;D12/533-567,900-901 ;152/209.8-209.1,209.25,209.28

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D354261 January 1995 Graas
D358793 May 1995 Himuro et al.
D397650 September 1998 Himuro
D416836 November 1999 Himuro
D432057 October 2000 Himuro
D450033 November 2001 Graas et al.
D455116 April 2002 Graas et al.
D455393 April 2002 Ratliff, Jr.
D462313 September 2002 Maxwell
D469055 January 2003 Johenning et al.
D470100 February 2003 Johenning et al.
D471152 March 2003 Graas et al.
6601624 August 2003 Ratliff, Jr.
D484846 January 2004 Graas
D491516 June 2004 Miller et al.
D491883 June 2004 Landers et al.
D501180 January 2005 Landers et al.
D504105 April 2005 Landers et al.
D512015 November 2005 Landers et al.
D512958 December 2005 Allison et al.
D514059 January 2006 Dixon
D534857 January 2007 Poling et al.
D534859 January 2007 Landers et al.
D535247 January 2007 Shondel et al.
D535248 January 2007 Ashton et al.
D579861 November 2008 Haas et al.
D579862 November 2008 Harvey et al.
D579863 November 2008 Harvey et al.
D583305 December 2008 Ashton et al.
Primary Examiner: Cadmus; Stacia
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; the other side being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of a tire showing our new design, it being understood that the pattern repeats uniformly throughout the circumference of the tread and that the opposite side perspective view is a mirror image thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a front elevational view of a second embodiment, it being understood that an enlarged fragmentary view thereof would be substantially identical to that shown in FIG. 4, with the exception of the inclusion of the sidewall in solid lines.

In the drawings, the broken line showing of the sidewall, inner bead and the peripheral boundary between the tire tread and the sidewall in FIGS. 1 through 4 depict environmental subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed