Massager
Davis, Sr. July 21, 1
U.S. patent number D396,226 [Application Number D/063,142] was granted by the patent office on 1998-07-21 for massager. Invention is credited to Mark Edward Davis, Sr..
| United States Patent | D396,226 |
| Davis, Sr. | July 21, 1998 |
Massager
Claims
The ornamental design for the massager, as shown.
| Inventors: | Davis, Sr.; Mark Edward (Oak Leaf, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/063,142 |
| Filed: | November 27, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/211; D24/214 |
| Current International Class: | 2404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/211,214,200 ;601/122,125,126,128,131,134-137 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D328328 | July 1992 | Juarez |
| D369219 | April 1996 | Huang |
| D369661 | May 1996 | Taylor |
| D376015 | November 1996 | Newberry |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Crow, P.E.; Morgan L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a massager, showing my new design, the rear elevational view being identical thereto;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view thereof, the left side elevational view being identical thereto;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 