Combined massager and toy
Juarez July 28, 1
U.S. patent number D328,328 [Application Number 07/507,722] was granted by the patent office on 1992-07-28 for combined massager and toy. Invention is credited to Mark Juarez.
| United States Patent | D328,328 |
| Juarez | July 28, 1992 |
Combined massager and toy
Claims
The ornamental design for a combined massager and toy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Juarez; Mark (Oakland, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/507,722 |
| Filed: | April 11, 1990 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/211; D21/623; D21/630; D24/214 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/200,211,212,213,214 ;128/57,42,41,36,25B ;D21/166,185,108 ;446/97 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D270279 | August 1983 | Hamilton |
| D274555 | July 1984 | Shill |
| D281815 | December 1985 | Conn, Sr. et al. |
| D299321 | January 1989 | Smith |
| 1223508 | April 1917 | Meyner |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a combined massager and toy showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof, the opposite side elevational view being identical;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 