U.S. patent number D365,692 [Application Number D/023,716] was granted by the patent office on 1996-01-02 for glider. This patent grant is currently assigned to Jack-Post Corporation. Invention is credited to John T. Bycraft, Charles Pomeroy.
United States Patent | D365,692 |
Pomeroy , et al. | January 2, 1996 |
Inventors: | Pomeroy; Charles (South Bend, IN), Bycraft; John T. (South Bend, IN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Jack-Post Corporation
(Buchanan, MI) |
Appl. No.: | D/023,716 |
Filed: | May 31, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/344 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/334,344,347,370,379,381,500,501,502 ;297/273,281,282 |
D121462 | July 1940 | Tabb |
D123278 | October 1940 | Rink |
D135777 | June 1943 | Smith |
D141705 | June 1945 | Slaughter |
D165835 | February 1952 | Glass |
D281376 | November 1985 | Gregory, III |
D290911 | July 1987 | Pomeroy et al. |
D307361 | April 1990 | Pomeroy et al. |
D310604 | September 1990 | Pomeroy et al. |
D325823 | May 1992 | Pomeroy et al. |
D328197 | July 1992 | Braxton, III |
D334485 | April 1993 | Pomeroy et al. |
D338563 | August 1993 | Chiang |
D350855 | September 1994 | Pomeroy et al. |
Jack-Post Outdoor Furniture/Outdoor Products 1986, p. 7 "Model Fr-64 Glider".. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.