U.S. patent number D328,814 [Application Number 07/810,011] was granted by the patent office on 1992-08-25 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Rockport Company, Inc.. Invention is credited to David W. Foster, Raymond F. Tonkel.
United States Patent | D328,814 |
Tonkel , et al. | August 25, 1992 |
Inventors: | Tonkel; Raymond F. (Sudbury, MA), Foster; David W. (Marlboro, MA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Rockport Company, Inc.
(Marlboro, MA) |
Appl. No.: | 07/810,011 |
Filed: | December 18, 1991 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/970 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/264,265,272,308-314 ;36/45,83,84,89,102-107,112-115,132,136 |
D248512 | July 1978 | Nova et al. |
D273630 | May 1984 | Bidegain |
D296037 | June 1988 | Brown et al. |
D297181 | August 1988 | Selbiger et al. |
D299786 | February 1989 | Swett |
D303452 | September 1989 | Swett |
D313498 | January 1991 | Aveni |
4577419 | March 1986 | Chassaing |
Rockport.RTM. Spring 1992, p. 25, M3351, M3051, M3058, M3059 and M3355. . Rockport.RTM. Fall 1989, p. 7, M9054 and M 9051. . Rockport.RTM. Fall 1987, Spring 1988 Catalog, p. 3, M2265, M2456 and M2277. . Rockport.RTM. Fall 1990 Collections, W2655, W2658, W3251, W3255 and W3258. pp. 8, 16 & 17.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.