Boot
Nova , et al. July 18, 1
U.S. patent number D248,512 [Application Number 05/751,927] was granted by the patent office on 1978-07-18 for boot. This patent grant is currently assigned to Antonio Nova S.r.l.. Invention is credited to Oscar Nova, Renzo Nova.
| United States Patent | D248,512 |
| Nova , et al. | July 18, 1978 |
Boot
Claims
The ornamental design for a boot, as shown.
| Inventors: | Nova; Oscar (Legnano, IT), Nova; Renzo (Legnano, IT) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Antonio Nova S.r.l. (Legnano,
IT) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/751,927 |
| Filed: | December 17, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/912 |
| Current International Class: | D0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/271,272,274,275,276,308,312,313 ;36/32R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D204658 | May 1966 | Wakeland |
Other References
|
Boot & Shoe Recorder - 11/15/66 - p. 44 - boot at top. . Sporting Goods Dealer - 7/36 - p. 110 - boot at top.. |
Primary Examiner: Holtje; Nelson C.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue; Richard C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a boot showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front perspective view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 