U.S. patent number D271,038 [Application Number 06/225,195] was granted by the patent office on 1983-10-18 for liquid sprayer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Britt Tech Corporation. Invention is credited to Donald R. Anderson, Iven R. Norstrud, John H. Threlkeld.
United States Patent | D271,038 |
Anderson , et al. | October 18, 1983 |
Inventors: | Anderson; Donald R. (Britt, IA), Norstrud; Iven R. (Britt, IA), Threlkeld; John H. (Britt, IA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Britt Tech Corporation (Britt,
IA) |
Appl. No.: | 06/225,195 |
Filed: | January 15, 1981 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/213; D23/225 |
Current International Class: | D2301 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/17,18 ;239/143,286,287 |
D231785 | June 1974 | Thompson |
D232938 | September 1974 | Hettich et al. |
D234513 | March 1975 | Kommers |
D234514 | March 1975 | Kommers |
D235996 | July 1975 | Schneider |
D241439 | September 1976 | Ware et al. |
2723860 | November 1955 | Weeks |
3648935 | March 1972 | Waldrum |
3856211 | December 1974 | Williams |
3993225 | November 1976 | Manni |
3994438 | November 1976 | Farmery |
4006858 | February 1977 | Farmery |
4185782 | January 1980 | Belrose |
Hardware Age, Nov. 1958, p. 30, top and center left items.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.