Vehicle
Huff , et al.
U.S. patent number D878,969 [Application Number D/638,787] was granted by the patent office on 2020-03-24 for vehicle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Artisan Vehicle Systems, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Artisan Vehicle Systems Inc.. Invention is credited to Kyle Hickey, Brian R. Huff.
| United States Patent | D878,969 |
| Huff , et al. | March 24, 2020 |
Vehicle
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a vehicle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Huff; Brian R. (Newbury Park, CA), Hickey; Kyle (Moorpark, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Artisan Vehicle Systems, Inc.
(Camarillo, CA) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/638,787 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | February 28, 2018 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/93 |
| Current International Class: | 1208 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/166,167,169,171,172,181,183,190,196,216 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4500063 | February 1985 | Schmidt |
| D319996 | September 1991 | Thompson |
| D343819 | February 1994 | Meryman |
| D384317 | September 1997 | Jahnke |
| 5826672 | October 1998 | Holter |
| D414150 | September 1999 | Sutton |
| 5947520 | September 1999 | McHorse |
| 6286964 | September 2001 | Litmer |
| 6454035 | September 2002 | Waskow |
| 6682130 | January 2004 | Lustig |
| D504850 | May 2005 | Gunter |
| D532352 | November 2006 | Angelo |
| D532727 | November 2006 | Schiavone |
| 7185920 | March 2007 | Drummond |
| 7195307 | March 2007 | Tucker |
| 7207172 | April 2007 | Willix |
| 7240753 | July 2007 | Ellerman |
| D557191 | December 2007 | Curtis, Jr. |
| D560582 | January 2008 | Simons |
| D575694 | August 2008 | Opfer |
| D575696 | August 2008 | Gale |
| D617242 | June 2010 | Lackore |
| D627687 | November 2010 | Lewis |
| D654417 | February 2012 | Peltola |
| 8226158 | July 2012 | Jackson |
| D666541 | September 2012 | Stimel, Jr. |
| D673489 | January 2013 | Hanson |
| D677196 | March 2013 | Salaverry |
| 8469443 | June 2013 | Case |
| D707608 | June 2014 | Smith |
| D709421 | July 2014 | Conway |
| D709424 | July 2014 | Conway |
| D709425 | July 2014 | Conway |
| 8800703 | August 2014 | Miller |
| 8905445 | December 2014 | Critchley |
| 9221398 | December 2015 | Englander |
| 9233722 | January 2016 | Bixby |
| 9308944 | April 2016 | Hanson |
| D760126 | June 2016 | Doyle |
| D770350 | November 2016 | Lindsey |
| D780081 | February 2017 | Lee |
| D782381 | March 2017 | Conway |
| D785521 | May 2017 | Smith |
| 9643658 | May 2017 | Jaynes |
| D789856 | June 2017 | Wolff |
| D805981 | December 2017 | Conway |
| D812535 | March 2018 | Milton |
| D826816 | August 2018 | Lokers |
Assistant Examiner: Tisdell; Suzanne E
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Plumsea Law Group, LLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view of one side thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view of the opposite side thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof.
The broken lines included in the drawings show portions of the vehicle that form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
D00000
D00001
D00002
D00003
D00004
D00005
D00006
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 