U.S. patent number 3,914,768 [Application Number 05/438,201] was granted by the patent office on 1975-10-21 for multiple-beam cassegrainian antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated. Invention is credited to Edward Allen Ohm.
United States Patent |
3,914,768 |
Ohm |
October 21, 1975 |
Multiple-beam Cassegrainian antenna
Abstract
A multiple-beam Cassegrainian antenna configuration is disclosed
which supports a plurality of angularly displaced but well-isolated
beams and exhibits essentially zero aperture blockage. A plurality
of feed horns are clustered about the on-axis focal point of an
offset Cassegrainian antenna in which the subreflector is displaced
from the aperture to avoid blockage. This subreflector is sized and
shaped to accommodate the plurality of beams, and the feeds are
individually aimed toward the subreflector so that all of the beam
centers impinge upon the common effective center of the main
reflector. The antenna is well-suited for earth stations and
satellites.
Inventors: |
Ohm; Edward Allen (Holmdel,
NJ) |
Assignee: |
Bell Telephone Laboratories,
Incorporated (Murray Hill, NJ)
|
Family
ID: |
23739668 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/438,201 |
Filed: |
January 31, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/779;
343/781R; 343/837 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
25/00 (20130101); H01Q 19/192 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
19/19 (20060101); H01Q 25/00 (20060101); H01Q
19/10 (20060101); H01q 019/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/781,837,840,779 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hurewitz; David L. Dubosky; Daniel
D.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A multiple beam antenna comprising a main reflector having an
aperture, a smaller subreflector, said antenna having an on-axis
focal point lying outside the aperture, a plurality of means for
feeding energy toward the subreflector, at least one of the feeding
means being displaced from the on-axis focal point, the
subreflector having a surface area elongated to avoid spillover in
each direction corresponding to the displacement of a feeding means
from the on-axis focal point, the feeding means and the
subreflector being positioned so that they lie outside the aperture
of the main reflector and center the energy from each feeding means
on the main reflector, the subreflector reflecting energy from the
feeding means directly to the main reflector.
2. An antenna as claimed in claim 1 wherein the reflectors are
arranged to form a Cassegrainian antenna and the plurality of
feeding means are clustered about the on-axis focal point of the
Cassegrainian antenna.
3. An antenna as claimed in claim 2 further including a focal
feeding means located at the on-axis focal point for feeding energy
toward the subreflector.
4. An antenna as claimed in claim 2 wherein the surface of the main
reflector is essentially paraboloidal and the surface of the
subreflector is essentially hyperboloidal, and the feeding means
are feed horns.
5. An antenna as claimed in claim 2 wherein the plurality of
feeding means are displaced from the on-axis focal point along an
essentially straight line through the on-axis focal point and the
subreflector has an essentially oblate boundary having its longer
axis in the direction of the straight line.
6. An antenna comprising a main reflector, a smaller subreflector,
the subreflector being positioned to redirect radiation incident
upon it toward the main reflector, said reflectors being positioned
to form a Cassegrainian antenna, primary feed means located at the
on-axis focal point of the Cassegrainian antenna for feeding energy
toward the subreflector and the main reflector causing radiation
emanating from it to form a main beam which passes through an
antenna aperture, characterized in that the subreflector and said
primary means for feeding energy are located outside said aperture,
said antenna further comprising at least one secondary means for
feeding energy toward the subreflector, said secondary means for
feeding energy being located remote from the on-axis focal point
and being aimed toward the subreflector so that the center of its
beam impinges upon the main reflector at a center point common to
the center of the beam generated by the primary feed means, the
subreflector being enlarged in area so that spillover from the
secondary means is avoided.
7. An antenna as claimed in claim 6 wherein the surface of the main
reflector is essentially paraboloidal and the surface of the
subreflector is essentially hyperboloidal and the primary and
secondary means for feeding energy are feed horns.
8. An antenna as claimed in claim 6 wherein the surface of the
subreflector is essentially hyperboloidal and the boundary of the
subreflector is essentially oblate, having its larger axis in the
direction in which the secondary means for feeding energy is
displaced from the on-axis focal point.
9. An antenna as claimed in claim 6 wherein the antenna comprises a
plurality of secondary feeding means clustered about said on-axis
focal point, each of the plurality being individually aimed toward
the subreflector so that the centers of their beams impinge upon a
common effective point on the main reflector but due to their
displacement from the on-axis focal point radiate beams through the
aperture having paths divergent from the axis of the main beam and
from each other.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to antennas, and more particularly to
multibeam antennas for operation in satellite communication systems
at GHz frequencies.
A Cassegrainian configuration is a conventionally used antenna
which is compact and yet exhibits an intrinsically large focal
length to diameter ratio. It includes a main reflector, a
subreflector much smaller than the main reflector, and a feed. The
feed is aimed toward the subreflector which in turn causes
reflection toward the main reflector. This reflector radiates
energy through the antenna aperture. Both the subreflector and main
reflector are normally symmetrically oriented about the antenna
axis and the feed is normally located on the axis near the axial
intersection of vertex of the main reflector at a point referred to
herein as the on-axis focal point. The literature, such as
"Microwave Antennas Derived from the Cassegrain Telescope" by Peter
W. Hannan, IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, March
1961, page 140, describes the geometry of the Cassegrainian system.
This on-axis focal point, which is the point where a point source
must be placed to produce a plane wave output, is termed the real
focal point of the system. The beam from the feed is symmetrical
with respect to the feed axis, and the feed and antenna axes
coincide. Additionally, the phase center of the feed coincides with
the on-axis focal point.
Earth stations for proposed satellite communication systems,
especially those using closely spaced satellites, will utilize
multiple-beam antennas to simultaneously communicate with the
plurality of satellites. Similarly, the satellite's antenna may be
of the multibeam variety with each beam directed to one of many
separated earth stations.
The characteristics of a Cassegrainian antenna make it a preferred
form of antenna for satellite systems, and multiple feeds utilized
in combination with a reflective surface can produce multiple-beam
antennas. However, if multiple point-source feeds are employed with
a conventional Cassegrainian antenna, some feeds are displaced from
the on-axis focal point and less than optimum operation results due
to aperture blockage by the subreflector and displacement of the
feeds from the on-axis focal point. Inefficiencies due to blockage
are caused by the subreflector's location within the aperture of
the antenna while inefficiencies due to displacement of the feeds
are caused by two spillover effects. First, the energy from a feed
laterally displaced from a focal point will spill over a
subreflector which has been optimized for a full Cassegrainian
antenna. Secondly, if this spillover is minimized by reaiming the
feed so that the center of its beam impinges upon the center of the
subreflector, some of the energy reflected from the subreflector
will spill over the main reflector.
It is the object of the present invention to utilize the inherent
characteristics of the Cassegrainian antenna, but to avoid aperture
blockage and to enable a single Cassegrainian antenna to operate
with a number of well isolated individually aimed beams.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a Cassegrainian antenna
is designed to yield efficient multiple-beam operation. The
aperture blockage common in Casegrainian antennas is avoided by
utilizing an "offset" Cassegrainian design which includes portions
of the conventional reflective surfaces positioned asymmetrically
with respect to the antenna axis. The main reflector in the offset
design constitutes only a portion of the normal paraboloidal
surface and it is located exclusively on one side of a plane
parallel to and displaced from the axis. The feeds and
hyperboloidal subreflector are located exclusively on the other
side of the displaced plane. In this manner the plane provides a
conceptual line of demarcation -- the antenna aperture on one side
and the subreflector on the other. Thus, beams radiating toward or
from the main reflector pass through the aperture without being
blocked by either the feeds or the subreflector which are both on
the other side of the conceptual barrier.
To permit operation with an isolated multiplicity of beams, a
cluster of feeds is placed about the on-axis focal point. The
subreflector surface area is enlarged in the dimension in which the
feeds are displaced in order to accommodate the beams emanating
from the off-axis feeds. This expansion creates an oblong
subreflector elongated laterally to form a billboard shape if the
feeds are laterally displaced. This increased subreflector size
avoids the spillover which would otherwise be caused by a beam
being directed beyond the edge of the subreflector (subreflector
spillover) or alternatively by a reflected beam being directed
beyond the edge of the main reflector (main-reflector spillover).
In a conventional Cassegrainian antenna, an enlarged subreflector
would increase the beam blockage which in turn would increase the
sidelobe levels and reduce the isolation between beams, but since
the subreflector causes no blockage in the offset Cassegrainian,
there is no disadvantage created by the enlarged subreflector.
The illumination efficiency is enhanced by careful aiming of the
multiple feeds. A feed located at the on-axis focal point is
properly aimed if it causes the center of its beam to impinge upon
the effective center of the main reflector. This results in a beam
with good circular symmetry and the lowest sidelobes for a given
illumination efficiency. However, if other feeds clustered about
the on-axis focal point are not reaimed toward the subreflector,
their beam centers intercept points on the main reflector displaced
from this effective center point with resultant beam degradations.
Accordingly, each feed is individually aimed in a precise manner so
that the center of its beam impinges the same effective center of
the main reflector. In this manner all feeds generate beams which,
while angularly displaced from one another by virtue of their feed
displacement from the on-axis focal point, are centered at the same
point of the main reflector.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a conventional Cassegrainian
antenna;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the antenna of FIG. 1
illustrating its radiation pattern;
FIGS. 3 and 4 are cross-sectional views of conventional
Cassegrainian antennas having offset feeds and illustrating two
forms of spillover;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a multibeam Cassegrainian antenna
designed in accordance with the present invention;
FIGS. 6A and 6B are respectively top and side cross-sectional views
of the antenna of FIG. 5 illustrating the radiation pattern of one
of its beams; and
FIG. 6C is an end view of the antenna of FIG. 5.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Conventional Cassegrainian antennas, such as the one shown in FIG.
1, generate an antenna aperture generally in the shape of a
doughnut since subreflector 13 blocks reflection from main
reflector 12 within cylindrial region 18 centered about the
antenna's geometric axis 15. A feed 11, which can be a corrugated
feed horn, is located on the axis 15 at the on-axis focal point and
radiates energy toward subreflector 13 which, in turn, redirects it
toward main reflector 12. The antenna is, of course, capable of
radiating and/or receiving, but for convenience all antenna
structures will be described herein as radiating while it should be
clearly understood that the invention is in no way limited to
radiating antennas inasmuch as the identical structure is
simultaneously capable of receiving.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic sectional veiw taken through axis 15 of
the antenna of FIG. 1. Since the antenna is symmetrical about axis
15, FIG. 2 is illustrative of all such axial sections. As can be
clearly seen from that diagram, energy radiating from feed 11
impinges the hyperboloidal surface of subreflector 13 and is
reflected to the paraboloidal surface of main reflector 12 from
which it is rereflected through the antenna aperture. As a
consequence of the focusing properties of the reflecting surfaces
the wave radiating from surface 12 exhibits parallel phase fronts
perpendicular to the direction of radiation. This radiation leaving
surface 12 would fill the entire antenna aperture, but subreflector
13 blocks the center cylinder 18 so that useful energy leaving the
antenna lies only in the doughnut shaped pattern represented by
region 19 resulting in the amplitude distribution shown to the
right of FIG. 2. A cone emanating from the on-axis focal point 20
at the phase center of feed 11 and diverging with an angle .theta.
defines that portion of the energy emanating from feed 11 which
after reflection by main reflector 12 will be blocked by
subreflector 13.
If the feed in a Cassegrainian antenna of FIG. 1 is displaced from
the antenna axis 15, radiation from the displaced feed will produce
spillover as well as aperture blockage. This is shown in FIGS. 3
and 4, top sectional diagrammatic views, taken through the antenna
axis 15 of a Cassegrainian antenna having its feed 21 offset from
axis 15. Radiation from this feed emanates from an effective point
source at 30 toward subreflector 13 which, in turn, redirects it
toward the main reflector 12. Subreflector 13 and main reflector 12
in FIG. 3 are identical to those shown in FIG. 2, but the
displacement of the feed to location 30 causes radiation toward
subreflector 13 to spill over the subreflector, resulting in a loss
of energy and potential interference. If feed 21 is aimed toward
the vertex of the main reflector, that is, so that the center of
its beam 24 intercepts main reflector 12 at axis 15, some of the
radiation from feed 21 illuminates an area beyond the outer
perimeter of subreflector 13 so that the antenna emits a narrow
errant beam 25. This beam is angularly displaced from the main
doughnut shaped beam in zone 29 and is generally undesirable. The
displacement of the feed to location 30 also eliminates
illumination of a portion 22 of main reflector 12. In addition, the
lateral offset of the feed causes an angular displacement of beam
24 from axis 15 and an associated change in the orientation of the
wave fronts in zone 29. At the right of FIG. 3 a graph illustrates
the amplitude distribution of the in-phase antenna pattern produced
in the plane of the cross-section of FIG. 3. As can be seen, the
peak amplitude along beam center 24 is lost due to blockage while
the average energy is displaced in the direction (upward in the
drawing) of the offset of beam center 24, and this asymmetrical
pattern will inherently create sidelobes worse than those of a
symmetrical pattern.
If, to avoid the subreflector spillover of FIG. 3 feed 21 is
reaimed as in FIG. 4, that is, its beam center 26 intercepts main
reflector 12 at 27 offset from axis 15, the spillover shown as 25
in FIG. 3 will be eliminated, but the radiating beam will in part
miss surface 12 and cause main reflector spillover as errant beam
25'. This is similarly misdirected from the main aperture radiation
and is, of course, undesirable. A portion 23 of main reflector 12
will also be unused. It is noted that beam center 26 is parallel to
beam center 24 since feed 21 remains at 30, but it is displaced
from antenna axis 15 more than was beam center 24 and as a result
the amplitude distribution of the in-phase antenna radiation shown
at the right of FIG. 4 is skewed (upward in the drawing) to a
greater degree than in the FIG. 3 case of subreflector spillover.
However, the peak amplitude is blocked in both cases. The amplitude
distribution in planes orthogonal to those of FIGS. 3 and 4, is
essentially the same as that shown for FIG. 2, and it will also
have the peak amplitude blocked.
Accordingly, aperture blockage and feed displacement produce energy
loss. However, it is well known that an antenna with a large focal
length to diameter ratio (F/D) can support a number of multiple
beams and that an inherent characteristic of a Cassegrainian
antenna is the requisite large F/D ratio. Therefore, to take
advantage of this characteristic of a Cassegrainian antenna is the
requisite large F/D ratio. Therefore, to take advantage of this
characteristic and produce a useful useful multibeam system, the
problems of spillover and aperture blockage must be overcome.
The antenna design shown in FIG. 5 provides multiple-beam operation
in accordance with the invention. In order to avoid aperture
blockage an asymmetrical partial version of a Cassegrainian antenna
is used. This essentially employs only portions of those reflective
surfaces utilized in the full Cassegrainian design of FIG. 1. Main
reflector 52 is that portion of the full paraboloidal surface which
is located on one side of a conceptual plane 59 parallel to and
displaced from the major geometric axis 50 of the parabola of
reflector 52. For clarity connections to feeds 54-58 are omitted,
and support 61, which includes conventional azimuth and elevation
control mechanism, is shown only in block form. FIG. 6A shows the
offset arrangement of the Cassegrainian antenna in cross-sectional
view taken through the beam axis of the on-axis beam from
subreflector 53 to center point 60, and FIGS. 6B and 6C show side
and end views, respectively, of the antenna. The main reflector 52
is restricted to the space above plane 59 and the subreflector 53
is restricted to the space above axis 50 but below plane 59. It is
noted that axis 50 is a geometric axis defined with regard to the
axes of revolution of the paraboloidal and hyperboloidal surfaces.
It is a line emanating from the center of the paraboloid of which
surface 52 is a part but it does not intercept surface 52.
Feed horns 54-58 radiate toward subreflector 53. The resultant
beams are reflected to main reflector 52 and radiate outwardly
through the antenna aperture 64 which is located exclusively on one
side of boundary plane 59. The simple expedient of an asymmetrical
organization of the partial Cassegrainian surfaces eliminates the
aperture blockage so long as subreflector 53 is positioned outside
aperture 64; that is, as long as the space or aperture 64 through
which reflected radiation from main reflector 52 passes is
exclusively on the same side of plane 59 as is main reflector 52,
the elements which are located on the other side of the plane such
as subreflector 53 and feeds 54-58 cannot block the radiation, and
thus the resultant radiating pattern is not of the doughnut variety
and the dimensions of the specific antenna can be designed without
regard to an unusable hole in the radiating pattern. In addition,
the support members such as spars 65 need not be designed with
regard to their effects on radiation as essentially no radiation
impinges upon them.
If, however, this offset configuration is to be utilized
efficiently for multiple beams, the problem of spillover must be
overcome. The plurality of feeds 54, 55, 57 and 58 clustered about
the on-axis focal position of feed 56, would each tend, due to its
displacement from the axis, to create spillover from either the
subreflector or the main reflector. To avoid subreflector spillover
the surface area of subreflector 53 is extended laterally from
boundary 53' in order to accommodate a number of horizontally
displaced feeds. The clustered feeds 54, 55, 57 and 58 lie on an
essentially straight line through the on-axis focal point, and if
the feeds are laterally displaced so that this line is horizontal,
the horizontal dimension of the subreflector is made substantially
larger than the vertical dimension. This horizontally elongated
pattern of subreflector 53 is referred to as a billboard, and it
and the location of the off-axis feeds 54, 55, 57 and 58 are shown
in FIGS. 6A and 6C. It is noted that simple enlarging the
subreflector surface may not provide optimum operation and
accordingly the subreflector surface may be reshaped to deviate
from a true hyperboloidal surface, especially in the areas of the
elongations. The main reflector may also require reshaping to
improve performance.
While preventing subreflector spillover, the increased size of the
subreflector does not totally eliminate the problem of
main-reflector spillover, nor does it cure the defects caused by
misaimed beams. Each of the multiple beams is expected to point
toward a unique point, such as a specific earth station, if the
antenna is used on a satellite; or to a specific satellite if the
antenna is used at an earth station. Displacement of the feeds from
one another will, of course, cause the required divergence of the
resultant beams, but the symmetry of the amplitude distribution
across the aperture of the paraboloidal main reflector diminishes
if the center of the incident beam to be reflected deviates from
the effective center point 60 of surface 52. This effective center
point is chosen so that when a beam radiated from an on-axis feed,
such as 56, is centered on this effective center 60 of the main
reflector 52, the resulting beam radiating from the antenna is
optimally focused to pass through aperture 64 with the phase fronts
perpendicular to the main beam axis 66. Any deviation from this
center point 60 will cause the resulting beam to have an
asymmetrical amplitude distribution as it emanates from the
antenna. Accordingly, each of the multiple feeds is pointed
individually so that it causes its beam to impinge upon surface 52
at the common effective center point 60. This produces an amplitude
distribution for each beam essentially as shown in FIG. 6A. Thus,
the feed displacement determines the beam's angle but for every
beam the radiation is distributed symmetrically about its beam
center without blockage or spillover.
For purposes of clarity, only the radiation pattern of one
representative beam, that emanating from offset feed 54, is shown,
but all feeds 54-58 are aimed so that their beam centers pass
through the common effective center 60. Representative feed 54
generates a beam centered on line 67. This beam axis is reflected
by surface 52 at point 60 but arrives at a different angle (as seen
in FIG. 6A) from main beam axis 66 radiating from on-axis feed 56.
It therefore emerges as a beam centered on axis 67 angularly
displaced from beam axis 66. The plane fronts of this displaced
beam will, of course, be perpendicular to its axis 67 as is
desired. Beams emanating from other feeds, such as 58, will in turn
emanate from point 60 but will be centered on other axes, such as
68 which is angularly displaced from all other axes.
The lateral displacement of the feeds will cause angular
displacement in one plane, as shown as the horizontal plane in FIG.
6A, but all beam centers will lie in a common orthogonal plane as
can be seen in FIG. 6B. If a displacement of the beams in the
orthogonal plane is desired, feeds would have to be offset in the
direction perpendicular to that shown in FIG. 5, and this would
require a corresponding elongation of subreflector 53 in the
vertical direction to avoid subreflector spillover. It is, of
course, possible to displace feeds both laterally and vertically,
or each of the clustered feeds could be displaced from the on-axis
focal point in a different direction; such arrangements would, of
course, be required for those specific applications where the
multiple beams are to be pointed in divergent directions.
In all cases it is to be understood that the above-described
arrangements are merely illustrative of a small number of the many
possible applications of the principles of the invention. Numerous
and varied other arrangements in accordance with these principles
may readily be devised by those skilled in the art without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *