U.S. patent number 3,813,936 [Application Number 05/313,225] was granted by the patent office on 1974-06-04 for methods and apparatus for testing earth formations.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Schlumberger Technology Corporation. Invention is credited to Harold J. Urbanosky, Frank R. Whitten.
United States Patent |
3,813,936 |
Urbanosky , et al. |
June 4, 1974 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING EARTH FORMATIONS
Abstract
In the representative embodiments of the new and improved
methods and apparatus for testing earth formations disclosed
herein, fluid-admitting means are placed into sealing engagement
with a potentially-producible earth formation and
selectively-operable valve means on the fluid-admitting means are
opened to place a filtering medium situated between the
fluid-admitting means and a flow line in communication with the
isolated formation. Then, before testing is commenced, well bore
fluids are introduced into the flow line and discharged through the
filtering medium in a reverse direction and into the earth
formation for cleaning the filtering medium of potentially-plugging
materials before connate fluids are introduced into the
fluid-admitting means.
Inventors: |
Urbanosky; Harold J. (Pearland,
TX), Whitten; Frank R. (Houston, TX) |
Assignee: |
Schlumberger Technology
Corporation (New York, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
23214863 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/313,225 |
Filed: |
December 8, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
73/152.25;
73/152.53 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
49/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
49/00 (20060101); E21B 49/10 (20060101); E21b
049/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;73/155,421R,151,152
;166/100 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Myracle; Jerry W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Archambeau, Jr.; Ernest R. Sherman;
William R. Moore; Stewart F.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for testing earth formations traversed by a well bore
and comprising the steps of:
engaging fluid-admitting means coupled by a filtering medium to a
fluid passage against a wall surface of said well bore adjacent to
an earth formation believed to contain producible connate fluids
for isolating said wall surface from fluids in said well bore and
placing said fluid-admitting means in position for receiving
connate fluids from said earth formation;
discharging said well bore fluids from said fluid passage in a
reverse direction through said filtering medium and into said
fluid-admitting means and said earth formation for cleansing said
filtering medium; and, thereafter,
communicating said fluid passage with an enclosed chamber initially
at a reduced pressure for drawing producible connate fluids from
said earth formation and in the opposite direction through said
filtering medium and into said fluid passage to obtain a filtered
sample of said connate fluids in said enclosed chamber.
2. The method of claim 1 further including the additional step
of:
measuring the pressure in saidenclosed chamber and said fluid
passage for obtaining at least one pressure measurement indicative
of at least one characteristic of said earth formation.
3. The method of claim 1 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring at least one characteristic of said filtered sample
drawn into said fluid passage for obtaining a series of
measurements representative of the production characteristics of
said earth formation; and, thereafter,
discontinuing further communication between said fluid passage and
said enclosed chamber for trapping said filtered sample
therein.
4. The method of claim 1 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring at least one characteristic of said filtered sample
drawn into said fluid passage for obtaining a series of
measurements representative of the production characteristics of
said earth formation; and, thereafter,
expelling said filtered sample from said enclosed chamber.
5. A method for testing earth formations traversed by a well bore
and comprising the steps of:
urging fluid-admitting means including a normally-closed
fluid-sampling member coupled by a filtering medium to a fluid
passage into sealing engagement with a wall surface of said well
bore adjacent to an earth formation believed to contain producible
connate fluids for isolating said wall surface from fluids in said
well bore and placing said fluid-sampling member in position for
subsequently communicating with said earth formation;
opening said fluid-sampling member and admitting said well bore
fluids into said fluid passage for passing said well bore fluids
through said filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member into
said earth formation to cleanse said filtering medium sand said
fluid-sampling member of potentially-plugging materials;
closing communication between said well bore fluids and said fluid
passage; and, thereafter,
coupling an enclosed reduced-pressure chamber to said fluid passage
for drawing producible connate fluids from said earth formation
through said fluid-sampling member and said filtering medium and
into said fluid passage to obtain a filtered sample of said connate
fluids in said enclosed chamber.
6. The method of claim 5 further including the additional step
of:
uncoupling said enclosed chamber from said fluid passage for
collecting said filtered sample.
7. The method of claim 5 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
series of pressure measurements representative of the production
characteristics of said earth formation; and
uncoupling said enclosed chamber from said fluid passage for
collecting said filtered sample in said enclosed chamber.
8. The method of claim 5 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
series of pressure measurements representative of the production
characteristics of said earth formation;
expelling said filtered sample from said enclosed chamber and
uncoupling said enclosed chamber from said fluid passage;
reclosing said fluid-sampling member;
reducing the pressure in said enclosed chamber;
removing said fluid-admitting means from said wall surface and
urging said fluid-admitting means into sealing engagement with
another wall surface of said well bore adjacent to another earth
formation believed to contain producible connate fluids for
isolating said other wall surface from said well bore fluids and
placing said fluid-sampling member in position for subsequently
communicating with said other earth formation;
re-opening said fluid-sampling member and re-admitting said well
bore fluids into said fluid passage for passing said well bore
fluids through said filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member
into said other earth formation to recleanse said filtering medium
and said fluid-sampling member of potentially-plugging
materials;
reclosing communication between said well bore fluids and said
fluid passage;
recoupling said enclosed chamber to said fluid passage for drawing
producible connate fluids from said other earth formation through
said fluid-sampling member and said filtering medium and into said
fluid passage to obtain a filtered sample of said connate fluids
from said other earth formation in said enclosed chamber; and
remonitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
second series of pressure measurements representative of the
production characteristics of said other earth formation.
9. The method of claim 5 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
series of pressure measurements representative of the production
characteristics of said earth formation;
coupling a sample receiver at a reduced pressure to said fluid
passage for collecting filtered connate fluids from said earth
formation in said sample receiver;
closing said sample receiver for entrapping connate fluids
collected therein;
expelling said filtered sample from said enclosed chamber and
uncoupling said enclosed chamber from said fluid passage;
reclosing said fluid-sampling chamber;
removing said fluid-admitting means from said wall surface and
urging said fluid-admitting means into sealing engagement with
another wall surface of said well bore adjacent to another earth
formation believed to contain producible connate fluids for
isolating said other wall surface from said well bore fluids and
placing said fluid-sampling member in position for subsequently
communicating with said other earth formation;
re-opening said fluid-sampling member and re-admitting said well
bore fluids into said fluid passage for passing said well bore
fluids through said filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member
into said other earth formation to recleanse said filtering medium
and said fluid-sampling member of potentially-plugging
materials;
reclosing communication between said well bore fluids and said
fluid passage;
recoupling said enclosed chamber to said fluid passage for drawing
producible connate fluids from said other earth formation through
said fluid-sampling member and said filtering medium and into said
fluid passage to obtain a filtered sample of said connate fluids
from said other earth formation in said enclosed chamber; and
remonitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
second series of pressure measurements representative of the
production characteristics of said other earth formation.
10. The method of claim 9 further including the additional step
of:
following the remonitoring step, coupling a second sample receiver
at a reduced pressure to said fluid passage for collecting filtered
connate fluids from said other earth formation in said second
sample receiver; and
closing said second sample receiver for entrapping connate fluids
collected therein.
11. The method of claim 5 further including the additional steps
of:
monitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
series of pressure measurements representative of the production
characteristics of said earth formation;
expelling said filtered sample from said enclosed chamber and
uncoupling said enclosed chamber from said fluid passage;
reclosing said fluid-sampling member;
reducing the pressure in said enclosed chamber;
removing said fluid-admitting means from said wall surface and
urging said fluid-admitting means into sealing engagement with
another wall surface of said well bore adjacent to another earth
formation believed to contain producible connate fluids for
isolating said other wall surface from said well bore fluids and
placing said fluid-sampling member in position for subsequently
communicating with said other earth formation;
re-opening said fluid-sampling member and re-admitting said well
bore fluids into said fluid passage for passing said well bore
fluids through said filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member
into said other earth formation to recleanse said filtering medium
and said fluid-sampling member of potentially-plugging
materials;
reclosing communication between said well bore fluids and said
fluid passage;
recoupling said enclosed chamber to said fluid passage for drawing
producible connate fluids from said other earth formation through
said fluid-sampling member and said filtering medium and into said
fluid passage to obtain a filtered sample of said connate fluids
from said other earth formation in said enclosed chamber;
remonitoring the pressure in said fluid passage for obtaining a
second series of pressure measurements representative of the
production characteristics of said other earth formation;
coupling a sample receiver at a reduced pressure to said fluid
passage for collecting filtered connate fluids from said other
earth formation in said sample receiver; and
closing said sample receiver for entrapping connate fluids
collected therein.
12. A method for testing earth formations traversed by a well bore
and comprising the steps of:
urging fluid-admitting means including a fluid passage coupled by a
filtering medium to a fluid-sampling member having a
normally-closed forward end and a rearward portion to the rear of
said filtering medium into sealing engagement with a wall surface
of said well bore adjacent to an earth formation believed to
contain producible connate fluids for isolating said wall surface
from fluids in said well bore and placing said closed end of said
fluid-sampling member into position for subsequently receiving
connate fluids from said earth formation;
opening said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member and admitting said well bore fluids into said fluid passage
for passing said well bore fluids through said filtering medium and
said fluid-sampling member into said earth formation to cleanse
said filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member of
potentially-plugging materials;
closing communication between said well bore fluids and said fluid
passage;
expanding the volume of an enclosed test chamber coupled to said
fluid passage downstream of said filtering medium for reducing the
pressure in said fluid passage and said test chamber to about
atmospheric pressure;
after said test chamber is expanded, coupling said test chamber to
said fluid passage at a speed sufficient to quickly induct a
filtered sample of producible connate fluids from said earth
formation into said expanded test chamber for momentarily reducing
the pressure of said connate fluid sample to about atmospheric
pressure and displacing loose plugging materials from said wall
surface into said rearward portion of said fluid-sampling member to
the rear of said filtering medium; and
monitoring the pressure in said expanded test chamber for obtaining
a series of pressure measurements indicative of the production
capabilities of said earth formation.
13. The method of claim 12 further including the additional step
of:
recording said pressure measurements for obtaining a record
representative of the pressure characteristics of said earth
formation as connate fluids are produced therefrom.
14. The method of claim 12 further including the additional step
of:
after the pressure-monitoring step, coupling an enclosed sample
chamber to said fluid passage downstream of said filtering medium
for collecting another filtered sample of connate fluids from said
earth formation.
15. The method of claim 12 further including the additional steps
of:
after the pressure-monitoring step, reducing the volume of said
test chamber for expelling said sample of connate fluids into said
well bore;
uncoupling said test chamber from said fluid passage;
reclosing said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member;
re-opening said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member and re-admitting said well bore fluids into said fluid
passage for again passing said well bore fluids through said
filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member into said earth
formation to recleanse said filtering medium and said
fluid-sampling member for potentially-plugging materials;
reclosing communication between said well bore fluids and said
fluid passage;
re-expanding the volume of said test chamber for again reducing the
pressure in said fluid passage and said test chamber to about
atmospheric pressure;
after said test chamber is re-expanded, re-coupling said
re-expanded test chamber to said fluid passage at a speed
sufficient to quickly induct a second filtered sample of producible
connate fluids into said re-expanded test chamber for momentarily
reducing the pressure of said second sample to about atmospheric
pressure and displacing additional loose plugging materials from
said wall surface into said rearward portion of said fluid-sampling
member to the rear of said filtering medium; and
re-monitoring the pressure in said re-expanded test chamber for
obtaining a second series of pressure measurements indicative of
the production capabilities of said earth formation.
16. The method of claim 15 further including the additional step
of:
after obtaining said pressure measurements, coupling an enclosed
sample chamber to said fluid passage downstream of said filtering
medium for collecting another filtered sample of connate fluids
from said earth formation.
17. The method of claim 15 further including the additional steps
of:
after obtaining said pressure measurements, reducing the volume of
said test chamber again for expelling said second sample into said
well bore;
reclosing said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member; and
disengaging said fluid-admitting means from said wall surface.
18. The method of claim 12 further including the additional steps
of:
after the pressure-monitoring step, coupling an enclosed sample
chamber to said fluid passage downstream of said filtering medium
for collecting another filtered sample of connate fluids from said
earth formation;
reducing the volume of said test chamber for expelling said sample
of connate fluids into said well bore;
uncoupling said test chamber from said fluid passage;
reclosing said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member;
re-expanding the volume of said test chamber for again reducing the
pressure in said fluid passage and said test chamber to about
atmospheric pressure;
disengaging said fluid-admitting means from said wall surface and
urging said fluid-admitting means into sealing engagement with
another wall surface of said well bore adjacent to another earth
formation believed to contain producible connate fluids for
isolating said other wall surface from said well bore fluids;
re-opening said normally-closed forward end of said fluid-sampling
member and re-admitting said well bore fluids into said fluid
passage for aga1n passing said well bore fluids through said
filtering medium and said fluid-sampling member into said other
earth formation to recleanse said filtering medium and said
fluid-sampling member of potentially-plugging materials;
reclosing communication between said well bore fluids and said
fluid passage;
re-coupling said re-expanded test chamber to said fluid passage at
a speed sufficient to quickly induct a second filtered sample of
producible connate fluids into said re-expanded test chamber for
momentarily reducing the pressure of said second sample to about
atmospheric pressure and displacing loose plugging materials from
said other wall surface into said rearward portion of said
fluid-sampling member to the rear of said filtering medium; and
re-monitoring the pressure in said re-expanded test chamber for
obtaining a second series of pressure measurements indicative of
the production capabilities of said other earth formation.
19. The method of claim 18 further including the additional steps
of:
after obtaining said second series of pressure measurements,
coupling an enclosed sample chamber to said fluid passage
downstream for collecting another sample of connate fluids from
said other earth formation.
20. The method of claim 18 further including the additional steps
of:
after obtaining said second series of pressure measurements,
reducing the volume of said test chamber again for expelling said
second sample into said well bore;
uncoupling said test chamber from said fluid passage;
re-closing said normally-closed end of said fluid-sampling member;
and
disengaging said fluid-admitting means from said other wall
surface.
21. Formation-testing apparatus adapted for suspension in a well
bore traversing earth formations and comprising:
a body having a fluid passage adapted to receive connate
fluids;
fluid-admitting means on said body including a fluid-sampling
member having a forward end adapted to be selectively engaged with
a well bore wall for isolating a portion thereof from well bore
fluids, first valve means normally closing said forward end of said
fluid-sampling member, and filtering means coupling said fluid
passage to said fluid-sampling member to the rear of said first
valve means;
means on said body and selectively operable for positioning said
fluid-admitting means against a well bore wall to place said
fluid-sampling member in communication with earth formations beyond
said well bore wall; and
control means including second valve means selectively coupling
said fluid passage to the exterior of said body for discharging
well bore fluids through said fluid passage and in a reverse
direction through said filtering means and into an earth formation
to cleanse said filtering means of potentially-plugging material
upon opening of said first valve means.
22. The formation-testing apparatus of claim 21 further
including:
pressure-measuring means adapted for providing an indication of the
pressure conditions in said fluid passage.
23. The formation-testing apparatus of claim 21 further
including:
sample-collecting means on said body including a sample chamber,
and means selectively operable for coupling said sample chamber to
said fluid passage to receive connate fluids entering said
fluid-admitting means.
24. The formation-testing apparatus of claim 23 further
including:
pressure-measuring means adapted for providing an indication of the
pressure conditions in said fluid passage.
25. The formation-testing apparatus of claim 21 further
including:
pressure-reducing means on said body including an enclosed test
chamber, and means selectively operable for varying the volume of
said test chamber including piston means movable back and forth
between a first position reducing the volume of said test chamber
and a second position sufficiently expanding the volume of said
test chamber to reduce the pressure in said test chamber to about
atmospheric pressure;
pressure-measuring means adapted for providing indications
representative of the pressure conditions in said test chamber;
and
control means selectively operable after movement of said piston
means to said second position and including third valve means for
coupling said test chamber to said fluid passage at a speed
sufficient to induct a sample of producible connate fluids from an
earth formation in communication with said fluid-admitting means
into said fluid passage and said expanded test chamber for
momentarily reducing the pressure of a connate fluid sample to
about atmospheric pressure.
26. The formation-testing apparatus of claim 25 further
including:
a sample chamber on said body, and fourth valve means selectively
operable for coupling said sample chamber to said fluid passage to
receive connate fluids entering said fluid-sampling member.
Description
Heretofore, the typical wireline formation testers (such as the
tool disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,011,554) which have been most
successful in commercial service have been limited to attempting
only a single test of one selected formation interval. Those
skilled in the art will appreciate that once one of these typical
tools is positioned in a well bore and a sampling or testing
operation is initiated, the tool cannot be again operated without
first removing it from the well bore and reconditioning various
tool components for another run. Thus, even should it be quickly
realized that a particular sampling or testing operation already
underway will probably be unsuccessful, the operator has no choice
except to discontinue the operation and then return the tool to the
surface. This obviously results in a needless loss of time and
expense which would usually be avoided if another attempt could be
made without having to remove the tool from the well bore.
One of the most significant problems which have heretofore
prevented the production of a commercially successful
repetitively-operable formation-testing tool has been in providing
a suitable arrangement for reliably establishing fluid or pressure
communication with imcompetent or unconsolidated earth formations.
Although the several new and improved testing tools respectively
shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,352,361, U.S. Pat. No. 3,530,933, U.S.
Pat. No. 3,565,169 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,653,436 are especially
arranged for testing unconsolidated formations, for one reason or
another these tools are not adapted for performing more than one
testing operation during a single run in a given well bore. For
example, as described in these patents, each of these new and
improved testing tools employs a tubular sampling member which is
cooperatively associated with a filtering medium for preventing the
unwanted entrance of unconsolidated formation materials into the
testing tool. Experience has shown, however, that although these
new and improved filtering arrangements are highly successful for a
single operation, subsequent tests cannot be reliably performed
since particles of mudcake and exceptionally-fine formation
materials will often coat or plug the filtering medium. Thus,
following each test, the testing tool must be returned to the
surface and the filtering medium thoroughly cleaned to achieve an
acceptable level of operating reliability.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide
new and improved formation-testing methods and apparatus for
reliably obtaining multiple measurements of one or more fluid or
formation characteristics as well as selectively collecting one or
more samples of connate fluids, if desired, from incompetent or
unconsolidated earth formations.
This and other objects of the present invention are attained in the
practice of the new and improved methods described herein by
placing normally-closed fluid-admitting means having filtering
means cooperatively arranged therewith into sealing engagement with
an earth formation, opening communication between the filtering
means and the earth formation, and discharging well bore fluids in
a reverse direction through the filtering medium and into the
formation for cleansing the filtering medium of unwanted
possibly-plugging matter such as mudcake and loose formation
materials. To further achieve the objects of the present invention,
formation-testing apparatus is provided with fluid-admitting means
adapted to be sealingly engaged with a potentially-producible earth
formation. To limit the entrance of loose formation materials into
the fluid-admitting means, filtering means are disposed in the
fluid-admitting means. Normally-closed valve means are
cooperatively arranged in the fluid-admitting means for selective
movement to an open position for opening communication between an
isolated earth formation and the filtering means. Means are further
provided for discharging well bore fluids in 13 reverse direction
through the filtering means upon opening of the valve means for
flushing possibly-plugging materials away from the filtering
means.
The novel features of the present invention are set forth with
particularity in the appended claims. The invention, together with
further objects and advantages thereof, may be best understood by
way of the following description of exemplary apparatus employing
the principles of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying
drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 depicts the surface and downhole portions of a preferred
embodiment of new and improved formation-testing apparatus for
practicing the invention and incorporating its principles;
FIGS. 2A and 2B together show a somewhat-schematic representation
of the formation-testing tool illustrated in FIG. 1 as the tool
will appear in its initial operating position; and
FIGS. 3-5 A and B respectively depict the successive positions of
various components of the new and improved tool shown in FIGS. 2A
and 2B during the course of a typical testing and sampling
operation.
Turning now to FIG. 1, a preferred embodiment of a new and improved
sampling and measuring tool 10 incorporating the principles of the
present invention is shown as it will appear during the course of a
typical measuring and sampling operation in a well bore such as a
borehole 11 penetrating one or more earth formations as at 12 and
13. As illustrated, the tool 10 is suspended in the borehole 11
from the lower end of a typical multiconductor cable 14 that is
spooled in the usual fashion on a suitable winch (not shown) at the
surface and coupled to the surface portion of a tool-control system
15 as well as typical recording and indicating apparatus 16 and a
power supply 17. In its preferred embodiment, the tool 10 includes
an elongated body 18 which encloses the downhole portion of the
tool control system 15 and carries selectively-extendible
tool-anchoring means 19 and new and improved fluid-admitting means
20 arranged on opposite sides of the body as well as one or more
tandemly-coupled fluid-collecting chambers 21 and 22.
As is explained in greater detail in a copending application, Ser.
No. 313,235 by Harold J. Urbanosky filed Dec. 8, 1972, the new and
improved formation-testing tool 10 of the present invention and the
control system 15 are cooperatively arranged so that, upon command
from the surface, the tool can be selectively placed in any one or
more of five selected operating positions. As will be subsequently
described briefly, the control system 15 will function to either
successively place the tool 10 in one or more of these positions or
else cycle the tool between selected ones of these operating
positions. These five operating positions are simply achieved by
selectively moving suitable control switches, as schematically
represented at 23 and 24, included in the surface portion of the
system 15 to various switching positions, as at 25-30, so as to
selectively apply power to different conductors 31-37 in the cable
14.
Turning now to FIGS. 2A and 2B, the preferred embodiment of the
entire downhole portion of the control system 15 as well as the
tool-anchoring means 19, the fluid-admitting means 20 and the
fluid-collecting chambers 21 and 22 are schematically illustrated
with their several elements or components depicted as they will
respectively be arranged when the new and improved tool 10 is fully
retracted and the switches 23 and 24 are in their first or "off"
operating positions 25. In the preferred embodiment of the
selectively-extendible tool-anchoring means 19 schematically
illustrated in FIG. 2A, an upright wall-engaging anchor member 38
along the rear of the tool body 18 is coupled in a typical fashion
to a longitudinally-spaced pair of laterally-movable piston
actuators 39 and 40 of a typical design mounted tranversely on the
tool body 18. As will be subsequently explained, the lateral
extension and retraction of the wall-engaging member 38 in relation
to the rear of the tool body 18 is controlled by the control system
15 which is operatively arranged to selectively admit and discharge
a pressured hydraulic fluid to and from the piston actuators 39 and
40.
borehole fluid-admitting means 20 employed with the preferred
embodiment of the new and improved tool 10 are cooperatively
arranged for sealing-off or isolating selected portions of the wall
of the horehole 11; and, once a selected portion of the borehole
wall is packed-off or isolated from the well bore fluids,
establishing pressure or fluid communication with the adjacent
earth formations. As depicted in FIG. 2A, the fluid-admitting means
20 preferably include an annular elastomeric sealing pad 41 mounted
on the forward face of an upright support member or plate 42 that
is coupled to a longitudinally-spaced pair of laterally-movable
piston actuators 43 and 44 respectively arranged transversely on
the tool body 18 for moving the sealing pad in relation to the
forward side of the tool body. Accordingly, as the control system
15 selectively supplies a pressured hydraulic fluid to the piston
actuators 43 and 44, the sealing pad 41 will be moved laterally
between a retracted position adjacent to the forward side of the
tool body 18 and an advanced or forwardly-extended position.
By arranging the annular sealing member 41 on the opposite side of
the tool body 18 from the wall-engaging member 38, the lateral
extension of these two members will, of course, be effective for
urging the sealing pad into sealing engagement with the adjacent
wall of the borehole 11 and anchoring the tool 10 each time the
piston actuators 39, 40, 43 and 44 are extended. It will, however,
be appreciated that the wall-engaging member 38 as well as its
piston actuators 39 and 40 would not be needed if the effective
stroke of the piston actuators 43 and 44 would be sufficient for
assuring that the sealing member 41 can be extended into firm
sealing engagement with one wall of the borehole 11 with the rear
of the tool body 18 securely anchored against the opposite wall of
the borehole. Conversely, the piston actuators 43 and 44 could be
similarly omitted where the extension of the wall-engaging member
38 alone would be effective for moving the other side of the tool
body 18 forwardly toward one wall of the borehole 11 to place the
sealing pad 41 into firm sealing engagement therewith. However, in
the preferred embodiment of the formation-testing tool 10, both the
tool-anchoring means 19 and the fluid-admitting means 20 are made
selectively extendible to enable the tool to be operated in
boreholes of substantial diameter. This preferred design of the
tool 10, of course, results in the overall stroke of the piston
actuators 39 and 40 and the piston actuators 43 and 44 being kept
to a minimum so as to reduce the overall diameter of the tool body
18.
To conduct connate fluids into the new and improved tool 10, the
fluid-admitting means 20 further include an enlarged tubular member
45 having an open forward portion coaxially disposed within the
sealing pad 41 and a closed rear portion which is slidably mounted
within a larger tubular member 46 secured to the rear face of the
plate 42 and extended rearwardly therefrom. By arranging the nose
of the tublar fluid-admitting member 45 to normally protrude a
short distance ahead of the forward face of the sealing pad 41,
extension of the fluid-admitting means 20 will engage the forward
end of the fluid-admitting member with the adjacent surface of the
wall of the borehole 11 as the annular sealing pad is also forced
thereagainst for isolating that portion of the borehole wall as
well as the nose of the fluid-admitting member from the well bore
fluids. To selectively move the tubular fluid-admitting member 45
in relation to the enlarged outer member 46, the smaller tubular
member is slidably disposed within the outer tubular member and
fluidly sealed in relation thereto as by sealing members 47 and 48
on inwardly-enlarged end portions 49 and 50 of the outer member and
a sealing member 51 on an enlarged-diameter intermediate portion 2
of the inner member.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that by virtue of the sealing
members 47, 48 and 51, enclosed piston chambers 53 and 54 are
defined within the outer tubular member 46 and on opposite sides of
the outwardly-enlarged portion 52 of the inner tubular member 45
which, of course, functions as a piston member. Thus, by increasing
the hydraulic pressure in the rearward chamber 53, the
fluid-admitting member 45 will be moved forwardly in relation to
the outer tubular member 46 as well as to the sealing pad 41.
Conversely, upon the application of an increased hydraulic pressure
to the forward piston chamber 54, the fluid-admitting member 45
will be retracted in relation to the outer member 46 and the
sealing pad 41.
Pressure or fluid communication with the fluid-admitting menas 20
is controlled by means such as a generally-cylindrical valve member
55 which is coaxially disposed within the fluid-admitting member 45
and cooperatively arranged for axial movement therein between a
retracted or open position and the illustrated advanced or closed
position where the enlarged forward end 56 of the valve member is
substantially, if not altogether, sealingly engaged with the
forwardmost interior portion of the fluid-admitting member. To
support the valve member 55, the rearward portion of the valve
member is axially hollowed, as at 57, and coaxially disposed over a
tubular member 58 projecting forwardly from the transverse wall 59
closing the rear end of the fluid-admitting member 45. The axial
bore 57 is reduced and extended forwardly along the valve member 55
to a termination with one or more transverse fluid passages 60 in
the forward portion of the valve member just behind its enlarged
head 56.
To provide piston means for selectively moving the valve member 55
in relation to the fluid-admitting member 45, the rearward portion
of the valve member is enlarged, as at 61, and outer and inner
sealing members 62 and 63 are coaxially disposed thereon and
respectively sealingly engaged with the interior of the
fluid-admitting member and the exterior of the forwardly-extending
tubular member 58. A sealing member 64 mounted around the
intermediate portion of the valve member 55 and sealingly engaged
with the interior wall of the adjacent portion of the
fluid-admitting member 45 fluidly seals the valve member in
relation to the fluid-admitting member. Accordingly, it will be
appreciated that by increasing the hydraulic pressure in the
enlarged piston chamber 65 defined to the rear of the enlarged
valve portion 61 which serves as a piston member, the valve member
55 will be moved forwardly in relation to the fluid-admitting
member 45. Conversely, upon application of an increased hydraulic
pressure to the forward piston chamber 66 defined between the
sealing members 62 and 64, the valve member 55 will be moved
rearwardly along the forwardly-projecting tubular member 58 so as
to retract the valve member in relation to the fluid-admitting
member 45.
Those skilled in the art will, of course, appreciate that many
earth formations, as at 12, are relatively unconsolidated and are,
therefore, readily eroded by the withdrawal of connate fluids.
Thus, to prevent any significant erosion of such unconsolidated
formation materials, the fluid-admitting member 45 is arranged to
define an internal annular space 67 and a flow passage 68 in the
forward portion of the fluid-admitting member, and a tubular screen
69 of suitable fineness is coaxially mounted around the annular
space. In this manner, when the valve member 55 is retracted,
formation fluids will be compelled to pass through the exposed
forward portion of the screen 69 ahead of the enlarged head 56,
into the annular space 67, and then through the fluid passage 60
into the fluid passage 57 and the tubular member 58. Thus, as the
valve member 55 is retracted, should loose or unconsolidated
formation materials be eroded from a formation as connate fluids
are withdrawn therefrom, the materials will be stopped by the
exposed portion of the screen 69 ahead of the enlarged head 56 of
the valve member thereby quickly forming a permeable barrier to
prevent the continued erosion of loose formation materials once the
valve member halts.
A sample or flow line 70 is cooperatively arranged in the
formation-testing tool 10 and has one end coupled, as by a flexible
conduit 71, to the fluid-admitting means 20 and its other end
terminated in a pair of branch conduits 72 and 73 respectively
coupled to the fluid-collecting chambers 21 and 22. To control the
communication between the fluid-admitting means 20 and the
fluid-collecting chambers 21 and 22, normally-closed flow-control
valves 74-76 of a similar or identical design are arranged
respectively in the flow line 70 and in the branch conduits 72 and
73 leading to the sample chambers. For reasons which will
subsequently be described in greater detail in explaining the
methods and apparatus of the present invention, a normally-open
control valve 77 which is similar to the normally-closed control
valves 74-76 is cooperatively arranged in a branch conduit 78 for
selectively controlling communication between the well bore fluids
exterior of the tool 10 and the upper portion of the flow line 70
extending between the flow-line control valve 74 and the
fluid-admitting means 20.
As illustrated, the control valve 77 employed in the present
invention is comprised of a valve body 79 cooperatively carrying a
typical piston actuator 80 which is normally biased to an elevated
position by a spring 81 of a predetermined strength. A valve member
82 coupled to the piston actuator 80 is cooperatively arranged for
blocking fluid communication between the inlet and outlet fluid
ports of the control valve whenever the valve member is moved to
its lower position. The control valves 74-76 are similar to the
control valve 77 except that a spring of selected strength is
respectively arranged in each for normally biasing each of these
valve members to a closed position.
As shown in FIGS. 2A-2B, a branch conduit 83 is coupled to the flow
line 70 at a convenient location between the sample chamber control
valves 75 and 76 and the flow-line control valve 74, with this
branch conduit being terminated at an expansion chamber 84 of a
predetermined volume. A reduced-diameter displacement piston 85 is
operatively mounted in the chamber 84 and arranged to be moved
between selected upper and lower positions therein by a typical
piston actuator shown generally at 86. Accordingly, it will be
appreciated that upon movement of the displacement piston 85 from
its lower position as illustrated in FIG. 2A to an elevated or
upper position, the combined volume of whatever fluids that are
then contained in the branch conduit 83 as well as in that portion
of the flow line 70 between the flow-line control valve 74 and the
sample chamber control valves 75 and 76 will be correspondingly
increased.
As best seen in FIG. 2A, the preferred embodiment of the control
system 15 further includes a pump 87 that is coupled to a driving
motor 88 and cooperatively arranged for pumping a suitable
hydraulic fluid such as oil or the like from a reservoir 89 into a
discharge or outlet line 90. Since the tool 10 is to be operated in
well bores, as at 11, which typically contain dirty and usually
corrosive fluids, the reservoir 89 is preferably arranged to
totally immerse the pump 87 and the motor 88 in the clean hydraulic
fluid. Inasmuch as the formation-testing tool 10 must operate at
extreme depths, the reservoir 89 is provided with an inlet 91 for
well bore fluids and an isolating piston 92 is movably arranged in
the reservoir for maintaining the hydraulic fluid contained therein
at a pressure about equal to the hydrostatic pressure at whatever
depth the tool is then situated. A spring 93 is arranged to act on
the piston 92 for maintaining the pressure of the hydraulic fluid
in the reservoir 89 at an increased level slightly above the well
bore hydrostatic pressure so as to at least minimize the influx of
well bore fluids into the reservoir. In addition to isolating the
hydraulic fluid in the reservoir 89, the piston 92 will also be
free to move as required to accommodate volumetric changes in the
hydraulic fluid which may occur under different well bore
conditions. One or more inlets, as at 94 and 95, are provided for
returning hydraulic fluid from the control system 15 to the
reservoir 89 during the operation of the tool 10.
The fluid outlet line 90 is divided into two major branch lines
which are respectively designated as the "set" line 96 and the
"retract" line 97. To control the admission of hydraulic fluid to
the "set" and "retract" lines 96 and 97, a pair of normally-closed
solenoid-actuated valves 98 and 99 are cooperatively arranged to
selectively admit hydraulic fluid to the two lines as the control
switch 23 at the surface is selectively positioned; and a typical
check valve 100 is arranged in the "set" line 96 downstream of the
control valve 98 for preventing the reverse flow of the hydraulic
fluid whenever the pressure in the "set" line is greater than that
then existing in the fluid outlet line 90. Typical pressure
switches 101-103 are cooperatively arranged in the "set" and
"retract" lines 96 and 97 for selectively discontinuing operation
of the pump 87 whenever the pressure of the hydraulic fluid in
either of these lines reaches a desired operating pressure and then
restarting the pump whenever the pressure drops below this value so
as to maintain the line pressure within a selected operating
range.
Since it is preferred that the pump 87 be a positive-displacement
type to achieve a rapid predictable rise in the operating pressures
in the "set" and "retract" lines 96 and 97 in a minimum length of
time, the control system 15 also provides for temporarily opening
the outlet line 90 until the motor 88 has reached its rated
operating speed. Accordingly, the control system 15 is
cooperatively arranged so that each time the pump 87 is to be
started, the control valve 99 (if it is not already open) as well
as a third normally-closed solenoid-actuated valve 104 will be
temporarily opened to bypass hydraulic fluid directly from the
output line 90 to the reservoir 89 by way of the return line 94.
Once the motor 88 has reached operating speed, the bypass valve 104
will, of course, be reclosed and either the "set" line control
valve 98 or the "retract" line control valve 99 will be selectively
opened as required for that particular operational phase of the
tool 10. It should be noted that during those times that the
"retract" line control valve 99 and the fluid-bypass valve 104 are
opened to allow the motor 88 to reach its operating speed, the
check valve 100 will function to prevent the reverse flow of
hydraulic fluid from the "set" line 96 when the "set" line control
valve 98 is open.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that the control system 15
cooperates for selectively supplying pressured hydraulic fluid to
the "set" and "retract" lines 96 and 97. Since the pressure
switches 101 and 102 respectively function only to limit the
pressures in the "set" and "retract" lines to a selected maximum
pressure range commensurate with the rating of the pump 87, the new
and improved control system 15 is further arranged to cooperatively
regulate the pressure of the hydraulic fluid which is being
supplied at various times to selected portions of the system.
Although this regulation can be accomplished in different manners,
it is preferred to employ a number of pressure-actuated control
valves such as shown schematically at 105-108 in FIGS. 2A and 2B.
As shown in FIG. 2A, the control valve 105, for example, includes a
valve body 109 having a valve seat 110 coaxially arranged therein
between inlet and outlet fluid ports. The upper portion of the
valve body 109 is enlarged to provide a piston cylinder 111
carrying an actuating piston 112 in coincidental alignment with the
valve seat 110. A spring 113 of a predetermined strength is
arranged for normally urging the actuating piston 112 toward the
valve seat 110 and a control port 114 is provided for admitting
hydraulic fluid into the cylinder 111 at a sufficient pressure to
overcome the force of this spring whenever the piston is to be
selectively moved away from the valve seat. Since the control
system 15 operates at pressures no less than the hydrostatic
pressure of the well bore fluids, a relief port 115 is provided in
the valve body 109 for communicating the space in the cylinder 111
above the actuating piston 112 with the reservoir 89. A valve
member 116 complementally shaped for seating engagement with the
valve seat 110 is cooperatively coupled to the actuating piston 112
as by an upright stem 117 which is slidably disposed in an axial
bore 118 in the piston. A spring 119 of selected strength is
disposed in the axial bore 118 for normally urging the valve member
said enclosed into seating engagement with the valve seat 110.
Accordingly, in its operating position depicted in FIG. 2A, the
control valve 105 (as well as the valve 106) will simply function
as a normally-closed check valve. This is to say, in this operating
position, hydraulic fluid can flow only in a reverse direction
whenever the pressure at the valve outlet is sufficiently greater
than the inlet pressure to elevate the valve member 116 from the
valve seat 110 against the predetermined closing force
pressure-actuated by the spring 119. On the other hand, when
sufficient fluid pressure is applied to the control port 114 for
elevating the actuating piston, opposed shoulders, as at 120, on 23
the stem 117 and the piston 112 will engage for elevating the valve
member 116 from the valve seat 110.
As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, it will be appreciated that the
control valve 107 (as well as the valve 108) is similar to the
control valve 105 except that in the first-mentioned control valve,
the valve member 121 is preferably rigidly coupled to its
associated actuating piston 122. Thus, the control valve 107 (as
well as the valve 108) has no alternate checking action allowing
reverse flow and is simply a normally-closed pressure-actuated
valve for selectively controlling fluid communication between its
inlet and outlet ports. Hereagain, the hydraulic pressure at which
the control valve 107 (as well as the valve 108) is to selectively
open is governed by the predetermined strength of the spring 123
normally biasing the valve member 121 to its closed position.
The "set" line downstream of the check valve 100 is comprised of a
low-pressure section 124 having one branch 125 coupled to the fluid
inlet of the control valve 107 and another branch 126 which is
coupled to the fluid inlet of the control valve 105 to selectively
supply hydraulic fluid to a high-pressure section 127 of the "set"
line which is itself terminated at the fluid inlet of the control
valve 108. To regulate the supply of hydraulic fluid from the
low-pressure section 124 to the high-pressure section 127 of the
"set" line 96, a pressure-communicating line 128 is coupled between
the low-pressure section and the control port of the control valve
105. Accordingly, so long as the pressure of the hydraulic fluid in
the low-pressure section of the "set" line 96 remains below the
predetermined actuating pressure required to open the control valve
105, the high-pressure section 127 will be isolated from the
low-pressure section 124. Conversely, once the hydraulic pressure
in the low-pressure line 124 reaches the predetermined actuating
pressure of the valve 105, the control valve will open to admit the
hydraulic fluid into the high-pressure line 127.
The control valves 107 and 108 are respectively arranged to
selectively communicate the low-pressure and high-pressure sections
124 and 127 of the "set" line 96 with the fluid reservoir 89. To
accomplish this, the control ports of the two control valves 107
and 108 are each connected to the "retract" line 97 by suitable
pressure-communicating lines 129 and 130. Thus, whenever the
pressure in the "retract" line 97 reaches their respective
predetermined actuating levels, the control valves 107 and 108 will
be respectively opened to selectively communicate the two sections
124 and 127 of the "set" line 96 with the reservoir 89 by way of
the return line 94 coupled to the respective outlets of the two
control valves.
As previously mentioned, in FIGS. 2A-2B the tool 10 and the
sub-surface portion of the control system 15 are depicted as their
several components will appear when the tool is retracted. At this
point, the wall-engaging member 38 and the sealing pad 41 are
respectively retracted against the tool body 18 to facilitate
passage of the tool 10 into the borehole 11. To prepare the tool 10
for lowering into the borehole 11, the switches 23 and 24 are moved
to their second or "initialization" positions 26. At this point,
the hydraulic pump 87 is started to raise the pressure in the
"retract" line 97 to a selected maximum to be certain that the pad
41 and the wall-engaging member 38 are fully retracted. As
previously mentioned, the control valves 99 and 104 will be
momentarily opened when the pump 87 is started until the pump motor
88 has reached its operating speed. At this time also, the control
valve 77 is open and that portion of the flow line 70 between the
closed flow-line control valve 74 and the fluid-admitting means 20
will be filled with well bore fluids at the hydrostatic pressure at
the depths at which the tool 10 is then situated.
When the tool 10 is at a selected operating depth, the switches 23
and 24 are advanced to their third positions 27. Then, once the
pump 87 has reached its rated operating speed, the hydraulic
pressure in the output line 90 will rapidly rise to its selected
maximum operating pressure as determined by the maximum or "off"
setting of the pressure switch 101. As the pressure progressively
rises, the control systems 15 will successively function at
selected intermediate pressure levels for sequentially operating
the several control valves 105-108 as described fully in the
aforementioned copending application, Ser. No. 313,235.
Turning now to FIG. 3, selected portions of the control system 15
and various components of the tool 10 are schematically represented
to illustrate the operation of the tool at about the time that the
pressure in the hydraulic output line 90 reaches its lowermost
intermediate pressure level. To facilitate an understanding of the
operation of the tool 10 and the control system 15 at this point in
its operating cycle, only those components which are then operating
are shown in FIG. 3.
At this time, since the control switch 23 (FIG. 1) is in its third
position 27, the solenoid valves 98 and 104 will be open; and,
since the hydraulic pressure in the "set" line 96 has not yet
reached the upper pressure limit as determined by the pressure
switch 101, the pump motor 88 will be operating. Since the control
valve 105 (not shown in FIG. 3) is closed, the high-pressure
section 127 of the "set" line 96 will still be isolated from the
low-pressure section 124. Simultaneously, the hydraulic fluid
contained in the forward pressure chambers of the piston actuators
39, 40, 43 and 44 will be displaced (as shown by the arrows as at
131) to the "retract" line 97 and returned to the reservoir 89 by
way of the open solenoid valve 104. These actions will, of course,
cause the wall-engaging member 38 as well as the sealing pad 41 to
be respectively extended in opposite lateral directions until each
has moved into firm engagement with the opposite sides of the
borehole 11.
It will be noticed in FIG. 3 that hydraulic fluid will be admitted
by way of branch hydraulic lines 132 and 33 to the enclosed annular
chamber 53 to the rear of the enlarged-diameter portion 52 of the
fluid-admitting member 45. At the same time, hydraulic fluid from
the piston chamber 54 ahead of the enlarged-diameter postion 52
will be discharged by way of branch hydraulic lines 134 and 135 to
the "retract" line 97 for progressively moving the fluid-admitting
member 45 forwardly in relation to the sealing member 41 until the
nose of the fluid-admitting member 45 engages the wall of the
borehole 11 and then halts. The sealing pad 41 is then urged
forwardly in relation to the now-halted tubular member 45 until the
pad sealingly engages the borehole wall for packing-off or
isolating the isolated wall portion from the well bore fluids.
It should also be noted that although the pressured hydraulic fluid
is also admitted at this time into the forward piston chamber 66
between the sealing members 62 and 64 on the valve member 55, the
valve member is temporarily prevented from moving rearwardly in
relation to the inner and outer tubular members 45 and 46 inasmuch
as the control valve 106 (not shown in FIG. 3) is still closed
thereby temporarily trapping the hydraulic fluid in the rearward
piston chamber 65 to the rear of the valve member. The significance
of this delay in the retraction of the valve member 55 will be
subsequently explained.
As also illustrated in FIG. 3, the hydraulic fluid in the
low-pressure section 124 of the "set" line 96 will also be directed
by way of a branch hydraulic line 136 to the piston actuator 86.
This will, of course, result in the displacement piston 85 being
elevated as the hydraulic fluid from the piston actuator is
returned to the "retract" line 97 by way of a branch hydraulic
conduit 137. As will be appreciated, elevation of the displacement
piston 85 in the expansion chamber 84 will be effective for
significantly decreasing the pressure initially existing in the
isolated portions of the branch line 83 and the flow line 70
between the still-closed flow-line control valve 74 and the
still-closed chamber control valve 75 and 76 (not seen in FIG. 3).
The purpose of this pressure reduction will be subsequently
explained.
Once the wall-engaging member 38, the sealing pad 41 and the
fluid-admitting member 45 have respectively reached their extended
positions as illustrated in FIG. 3, it will be appreciated that the
hydraulic pressure delivered by the pump 87 will again rise. Then,
once the pressure in the output line 90 has reached its second
intermediate level of operating pressure, the control valve 106
will open in response to this pressure level to now discharge the
hydraulic fluid previously trapped in the piston chamber 65 to the
rear of the valve member 55 back to the reservoir 89.
As illustrated, in FIG. 4, once the control valve 106 opens, the
hydraulic fluid wil be displaced from the rearward piston chamber
65 by way of branch hydraulic lines 138, 139 and 135 to the
"retract" line 197 as pressured hydraulic fluid from the "set" line
96 surges into the piston chamber 66 ahead of the enlarged-diameter
portion 61 of the valve member 55. This will, of course, cooperate
to rapidly drive the valve member 55 rearwardly in relation to the
now-halted fluid-admitting member 45 for establishing fluid or
pressure communication between the isolated portion of the earth
formation 12 and the flow passages 57 and 60 in the valve member by
way of the filter screen 69.
Although this is not fully illustrated in FIG. 4, it will be
recalled from FIGS. 2A and 2B that the control valves 74-76 are
initially closed to isolate the lower portion of the flow line 70
between these valves as well as the branch line 83 leading to the
pressure-reduction chamber 84. However, in keeping with the
principles of the present invention, the flow-line
pressure-equalizing control valve 77 will still be open at the time
the control valve 106 opens to retract the valve member 55 as
depicted in FIG. 4. Thus, as the valve member 55 progressively
uncovers the filtering screen 69, well bore fluids at a pressure
greater than that of any connate fluids which may be present in the
isolated earth formation 12 will be introduced into the upper
portion of the flow line 70 and, by way of the flexible conduit
member 71, into the rearward end of the tubular member 58. As these
high-pressure well bore fluids pass into the annular space 67
around the filtering screen 69, they will be forcibly discharged
(as shown by the arrows 140) from the forward end of the
fluid-admitting member 45 for washing away any plugging materials
such as mudcake or the like which may have become deposited on the
internal surface of the filtering screen when the valve member 55
fitst uncovers the screen. Thus, to attain the objects of the
present invention, the control system 15 is operative for providing
a momentary outward surge or reverse flow of well bore fluids for
cleansing the filtering screen 69 of unwanted debris or the like
before a sampling or testing operation is commenced.
It will be appreciated that once the several components of the
formation-testing tool 10 and the control system 15 have reached
their respective positions as depicted in FIG. 4, the hydraulic
pressure in the output line 90 will again quickly increase to its
next intermediate pressure level. Once the pump 87 has increased
the hydraulic pressure in the output line 90 to this next
predetermined intermediate pressure level, the control valve 105
will selectively open as depicted in FIG. 5A. As seen there,
opening of the control valve 105 will be effective for now
supplying hydraulic fluid to the high-pressure section 127 of the
"set" line 96 and two branch conduits 141 and 142 connected thereto
for successively closing the control valve 77 and then opening the
control valve 74.
In this manner, as depicted by the several arrows at 143 and 144,
hydraulic fluid at a pressure representative of the intermediate
operating level will be supplied by way of a typical check valve
145 to the upper portion of the piston cylinder 146 of the
normally-open control valve 77 as fluid is exhausted from the lower
portion thereof by way of a conduit 147 coupled to the "retract"
line 97. This will, of course, be effective for closing the valve
member 82 so as to now block further communication between the flow
line 70 and the well bore fluids exterior of the tool 10.
Simultaneously, the hydraulic fluid will also be admitted into the
lower portion of the piston cylinder 148 of the control valve 74.
By arranging the biasing spring 81 for the normally-open control
valve 77 to be somewhat weaker than the biasing spring 149 for the
normally-closed control valve 74, the second valve will be
momentarily retained in its closed position until the first valve
has had time to close. Thus, once the valve 77 closes, as the
hydraulic fluid enters the lower portion of the piston chamber 148
of the control valve 74, the value member 150 will be opened as
hydraulic fluid is exhausted from the upper portion of the chamber
through a typical check valve 151 and a branch return line 152
coupled to the "retract" line 97.
It will be appreciated therefore, that with the tool 10 in the
position depicted in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the flow line 70 is now
isolated from the wall bore fluids and is in communication with the
isolated portion of the earth formation 12 by way of the flexible
conduit 71. It will also be recalled from the preceding discussion
of FIG. 3 that the branch flow line 83 as well as the portion of
the main flow line 70 between the flow-line control valve 74 and
the sample chamber control valves 75 and 76 were previously
expanded by the upward movement of the displacement piston 85 in
the reduced-volume chamber 84. Thus, upon opening of the flow-line
control valve 74, the isolated portion of the earth formation 12
will be communicated with the reduced-pressure space represented by
the previously-isolated portions of the flow line 70 and the branch
conduit 83.
Of particular interest to the present invention, it should be noted
that should the formation 12 be relatively unconsolidated, the
rearward movement of the valve member 55 in cooperation with the
forward movement of the fluid-admitting member 45 will allow only
those loose formation materials displaced by the advancement of the
fluid-admitting member into the formation to enter the
fluid-admitting member. This is to say, the fluid-admitting member
45 can advance into the formation 12 only by displacing loose
formation materials; and, since the space opened by the rearward
displacement of the valve member 55 is the only place into which
the loose formation materials can enter, further erosion of the
formation materials will be halted once the fluid-admitting member
has been filled with loose materials as shown in FIG. 5B. On the
other hand, should a formation interval which is being tested be
relatively well-compacted, the advancement of the fluid-admitting
member 45 will be relatively slight with its nose making little or
no penetration into the isolated earth formation. It will, of
course, be appreciated that the nose of the fluid-admitting member
45 will be urged outwardly with sufficient force to at least
penetrate the mudcake which typically lines the borehole walls
adjacent to permeable earth formations. In this situation, however,
the forward movement of the fluid-admitting member 45 will be
unrelated to the rearward movement of the valve member 55 as it
progressively uncovers the filtering screen 69. In either case, the
sudden opening of the valve 74 will cause mudcake to be pulled to
the rear of the screen 69 to leave it clear for the subsequent
passage of connate fluids.
AS best seen in FIGS. 5A and 5B, therefore, should there be any
producible connate fluids in the isolated earth formation 12, the
formation pressure will be effective for displacing these connate
fluids by way of the fluid-admitting means 20 into the flow line
until such time that the lower portion of the flow line 70 and the
branch conduit 83 are filled and pressure equilibrium is
established in the entire flow line. By arranging a typical
pressure-measuring transducer, as at 153 (or, if desired, one or
more other suitable transducers) in the flow line 70, one or more
measurements representative of the characteristics of the connate
fluids and the formation 12 may be transmitted to the surface by a
conductor 154 and, if desired, recorded on the recording apparatus
16 (FIG. 1). The pressure measurements provided by the transducer
153 will, of course, permit the operator at the surface to readily
determine the formation pressure as well as to obtain one or more
indications representative of the potential producing ability of
the formation 12. The various techniques for analyzing formation
pressures as well known in the art and are, therefore, of no
significance to understanding the present invention.
It will be recognized, of course, that by virtue of the purging
action which was previously provided by the outflowing well bore
fluids in the practice of the present invention, there is a
reasonable assurance that the filtering screen 69 will have been
cleared of plugging materials such as mudcake of formation
materials that may otherwise plug the fluid-admitting means 20.
However, the sudden introduction of connate fluids into the flow
line 70 will also be effective for clearing the screen 69 of
residual plugging materials.
The measurements provided by the pressure transducer 153 at this
time will indicate whether the sealing pad 41 has, in fact,
established complete sealing engagement with the earth formation 12
inasmuch as the expected formation pressures will be recognizably
lower than the hydrostatic pressure of the well bore fluids at the
particular depth which the tool 10 is then situated. This ability
to determine the effectiveness of the sealing engagement will, of
course, allow the operator to retract the wall-engaging member 38
and the sealing pad 41 without having to unwittingly or needlessly
continue the remainder of the complete operating sequence.
Assuming, however, that the pressure measurements provided by the
pressure transducer 153 show that the sealing pad 41 is firmly
seated, the operator may leave the formation-testing tool 10 in the
position shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B as long as it is desired to
observe as well as record the pressure measurements. As a result,
the operator can determine such things as the time required for the
formation pressure to reach equilibrium as well as the rate of
increase and thereby obtain valuable information indicative of
various characteristics of the earth formation 12 such as
permeability and porosity. Moreover, with the new and improved tool
10, the operator can readily determine if collection of a fluid
sample is warranted.
Once the several components of the tool 10 and the control system
15 have moved to their respective positions shown in FIGS. 5A and
5B, the hydraulic pressure will again rise until such time that the
"set" line pressure switch 101 operates to halt the hydraulic pump
87. Inasmuch as the pressure switch 101 has a selected operating
range, in the typical situation the pump 87 will be halted shortly
after the control valve 77 closes and the control valve 74 opens.
At this point in the operating cycle of the tool 10, once a
sufficient number of pressure measurements have been obtained, a
decision can be made whether it is advisable to obtain one or more
samples of the producible connate fluids present in the earth
formation 12. If such samples are not desired, the operator can
simply operate the control switches 23 and 24 for retracting the
wall-engaging member 38 as well as the sealing pad 41 without
further ado.
On the other hand, should a fluid sample be desired, the control
switches 23 and 24 (FIG. 1) are advanced to their next or so-called
"sample" positions 28 to open, for example, a solenoid valve 155
(FIG. 2B) for coupling pressured hydraulic fluid from the
high-pressure section 127 of the "set" line 96 to the piston
actuator 156 of the sample chamber control valve 75. This will, of
course, be effective for opening the control valve 75 to admit
connate fluids through the flow line 70 and the branch conduit 72
into the sample chamber 21. If desired, a "chamber selection"
switch 157 in the surface portion of the system 15 could also be
moved from its "first sample" position 158 to its so-called "second
sample" position 159 (FIG. 1) to energize a solenoid valve 160
(FIG. 2B) for opening the control valve 76 to also admit connate
fluids into the other sample chamber 22. In either case, one or
more samples of the connate fluids which are present in the
isolated earth formation 12 can be selectively obtained by the new
and improved tool 10.
Upon moving the control switches 23 and 24 to their so-called
"sample-trapping" positions 29, the pump 87 will again be
restarted. Once the pump 87 has reached operating speed, it will
commence to operate much in the same manner as previously described
and the hydraulic pressure in the output line 90 will begin rising
with momentary halts at various intermediate pressure levels.
Accordingly, when the control switches 23 and 24 have been placed
in their "sample trapping" positions 29, the solenoid valve 99 will
open to now admit hydraulic fluid into the "retract" line 97. By
means of the electrical conductor 103a (FIG. 1), however, the
pressure switch 103 is enabled and the pressure switch 102 is
disabled so that in this position of the control switches 23 and 24
the maximum operating pressure which the pump 87 can initially
reach is limited to the pressure at the lower operating pressure
level determined by the pressure switch 103. Thus, by arranging the
control valve 108 to open in response to a hydraulic pressure
corresponding to this predetermined pressure level, hydraulic fluid
in the high-pressure section 127 of the "set" line 96 will be
returned to the reservoir 89 by means of the return line 94. As the
hydraulic fluid in the high-pressure section 127 returns to the
reservoir 89, the pressure in this portion of the "set" line 96
will be rapidly decreased to close the control valve 105 once the
pressure in the line is insufficient to hold the valve open. Once
the control valve 105 closes, the pressure remaining in the
low-pressure section 124 of the "set" line 96 will remain at a
reduced pressure which is nevertheless effective for retaining the
wall-engaging member 38 and the sealing pad 41 fully extended.
As the hydraulic fluid is discharged from the lower portion of the
piston actuator 156 by way of the still-open solenoid valve 155 and
fluid from the "retract" line 97 enters the upper postion of the
actuator by way of a branch line 161, the chamber control valve 75
will close to trap the sample of connate fluids which is then
present in the sample chamber 21. Similarly, should there also be a
fluid sample in the other sample chamber 22, the control valve 76
can also be readily closed by operating the switch 157 to reopen
the solenoid valve 160. Closure of the control valve 75 (as well as
the valve 76) will, of course, be effective for trapping any fluid
samples collected in one or the other or both of the sample
chambers 21 and 22.
Once the control valve 75 (and, if necessary, the control valve 76)
has been reclosed, the control switches 23 and 24 are moved to
their next or so-called "retract" switching positions 30 for
initiating the simultaneous retraction of the wall-engaging member
38 and the sealing pad 41. In this final position of the control
switch 24, the pressure switch 103 is again rendered inoperative
and the pressure switch 102 is enabled so as to now permit the
hydraulic pump 87 to be operated at full rated capacity for
attaining hydraulic pressures greater than the first intermediate
operating level in the "retract" cycle. Once the pressure switch
103 has again been disabled, the pressure switch 102 will now
function to operate the pump 87 so that the pressure will now
quickly rise until it reaches the next operating level.
At this point, hydraulic fluid will be supplied through the
"retract" line 97 and the branch hydraulic line 147 for reopening
the pressure-equalizing control valve 77 to admit well bore fluids
into the flow line 70. Opening of the pressure-equalizing valve 77
will admit well bore fluids into the isolated space defined by the
sealing pad 41 so as to equalize the pressure differential existing
across the pad. Hydraulic fluid displaced from the upper portion of
the piston chamber 146 of the control valve 77 will be discharged
through a typical relief valve 161 which is arranged to open only
in response to pressures equal or greater than that of this present
operating level. The hydraulic fluid displaced from the piston
chamber 146 through the relief valve 161 will be returned to the
reservoir 89 by way of the branch hydraulic line 141, the
high-pressure section 127 of the "set" line 96, the still-open
control valve 108, and the return line 94.
When the hydraulic pressure in the output line 90 has either
reached the next operating level or, if desired, a still-higher
level, pressured hydraulic fluid in the "retract" line 97 will
reopen the control valve 107 to communicate the low-pressure
section 124 of the "set" line 96 with the reservoir 89. When this
occurs, hydraulic fluid in the "retract" line will be admitted to
the "retract" side of the several piston actuators 39, 40, 43 and
44. Similarly, the pressured hydraulic fluid will also be admitted
into the annular space 54 in front of the enlarged-diameter piston
portion 52 for retracting the fluid-admitting member 45 as well as
into the annular space 66 for returning the valve member 55 to its
forward position. The hydraulic fluid exhausted from the several
piston actuators 39, 40, 43 and 44 as well as the piston chambers
54 and 66 will be returned directly to the reservoir 89 by way of
the high-pressure section 124 of the "set" line 96 and the control
valve 107. This action will, of course, retract the wall-engaging
member 38 as well as the sealing pad 41 against the tool body 18 to
permit the tool 10 to be either repositioned in the well bore 11 or
returned to the surface if no further testing is desired.
It should be noted that although there is an operating pressure
applied to the upper portion of the piston cylinder 148 for the
flow-line control valve 74 at the time that the control valve 77 is
reopened, a normally-closed relief valve 162 which is paralleled
with the check valve 151 is held in a closed position until the
increasing hydraulic pressure developed by the pump 87 exceeds the
operating level used to retract the wall-engaging member 38 and the
sealing pad 41. At this point in the operating sequence of the new
and improved tool 10, the flow-line control valve 74 will be
reclosed.
The pump 87 will, of course, continue to operate until such time
that the hydraulic pressure in the output line 90 reaches the upper
limit determined by the setting of the pressure switch 102. At some
convenient time thereafter, the control switches 23 and 24 are
again returned to their initial or "off" positions 25 for halting
further operation of the pump motor 88 as well as reopening the
solenoid valve 104 to again communicate the "retract" line 97 with
the fluid reservoir 89. This completes the operating cycle of the
new and improved tool 10.
Referring again to FIG. 4, it will be appreciated that the new and
improved methods of the present invention will assure that
communication will be established between the flow line 70 and the
formation, as at 12, before any measurements or samples are taken.
For example, should the interior surface of the filtering screen 69
become unduly coated with particles of the relatively-impermeable
mudcake as the valve member 55 moves to its rearward position,
opening of the valve member will be effective for developing a
significant reverse flow of the higher-pressure well bore fluids
through the screen 69 and into the lower-pressure formation 12.
Similarly, should extremely-fine particles of sand or the like from
the formation 12 be lodged against the interior surfaces of the
filter medium 69, this reverse flow of well bore fluids will be
effective for cleansing the filter before any tests are made.
Accordingly, in keeping with the objects of the present invention,
since the control valve 77 is open to admit well bore fluids into
the upper portion of the flow line 70, when the valve member 55 is
opened the filtering screen 69 will be thoroughly cleansed by the
outward surge of well bore fluids. Thus, when the formation 12 is
subsequently communicated with the reduced or atmospheric pressure
initially present n the previously-isolated lower portion of the
flow line 70, producible connate fluids in the isolated portion of
the formation will be drawn into the flow line. It will, of course,
be recognized that if, on the other hand, there are no producible
connate fluids in the formation 12, the pressure readings provided
by the transducer 153 will simply indicate little or no pressure
rise in the flow line 70. In either case, the operator at the
surface will be reliably assured that a failure to obtain a
significant pressure increase in the flow line measurements is in
fact caused by a non-producible formation and is not unknowingly
attributed to a tightly-plugged filter screen 69 instead. Moreover,
the new and improved methods of the present invention are of equal
advantage when a sample of connate fluids is to be taken as well.
Thus, instead of obtaining little or no flow of fluid which would
occur with at least a partially-blocked screen 69, the reverse
flushing of the filter will assure the operator that the screen is
clean so that formation fluids are free to flow into the tool 10.
This can clearly reduce the time required to perform a typical
testing operation.
While only a particular embodiment of the present invention and one
mode of practicing the invention have been shown and described, it
is apparent that changes and modifications may be made without
departing from this invention in its broader aspects; and,
therefore, the aim in the appended claims is to cover all such
changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope
of this invention.
* * * * *