loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for piercing a container".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus For Piercing A Container Grant 3,688,399 - September 5, 1 | 1972-09-05 |
Film Transport Indicator In A Camera Grant 3,688,668 - September 5, 1 | 1972-09-05 |
Anthraquinone Compounds Containing A Triazolylthio Group Grant 3,689,501 - September 5, 1 | 1972-09-05 |
Carbocyanine Filter Dyes And Sensitizers For Silver Halide Emulsions Grant 3,671,648 - June 20, 1 | 1972-06-20 |
Method Of And Apparatus For Applying An Electrical Charge To A Moving Sheet Of Flexible Material Grant 3,671,806 - June 20, 1 | 1972-06-20 |
Photofabrication System Using Developed Negative And Positive Images In Combination With Negative-working And Positive-working Photoresist Compositions To Produce Resists On Opposite Sides Of A Workpiece Grant 3,620,736 - November 16, 1 | 1971-11-16 |
Photographic Element Including Superimposed Silver Halide Layers Of Different Speeds Grant 3,620,747 - November 16, 1 | 1971-11-16 |
Receiving Sheet For Diffusion Transfer Processes Grant 3,620,728 - November 16, 1 | 1971-11-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.