SIMPLIFY
Enterprise Database Corporation
Application Filed: 2010-05-21
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED-FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85045260 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Kevin Oliveira |
| Attorney Docket Number | 43956.00033 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | POWER, MARGARET G |
Timeline
| 2010-05-21 | Application Filed |
| 2014-04-09 | Abandon |
| 2014-05-20 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2014-05-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Enterprise Database Corporation |
| Address | 7900 Sudley Road, 7th Floor Manassas VA 20109 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | VA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | computer and data networking hardware in the nature of devices for transporting and aggregating data, voice or wireless communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; computer hardware and software and data networking hardware and software in the nature of devices, for use with personal computers, for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring voice, data, information, images, signals, and messages; electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; computer software to manage, analyze, retrieve, monitor, maintain, report on, structure, model, forecast, present and display data and information from various databases; computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer software to automate data warehousing; computer software for use in database management; computer software for computer systems and application development, deployment and management; and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-05-25 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-05-26 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-09-03 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2010-09-14 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2010-09-15 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-03-09 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-03-09 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-03-10 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2011-04-19 | 9 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2011-04-20 | 10 CNSL S: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-10-20 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2011-10-20 | 12 RCSC S: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | 2011-10-20 | 13 ERSI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-10-20 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-10-20 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-12-06 | 16 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2011-12-07 | 17 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-05-31 | 18 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-05-31 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-06-01 | 20 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-07-14 | 21 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2012-07-16 | 22 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-09-28 | 23 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2013-01-15 | 24 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-01-15 | 25 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-01-15 | 26 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2013-02-19 | 27 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2013-02-20 | 28 CNSL S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2013-08-21 | 29 RCCK S: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-10-07 | 30 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2013-10-08 | 31 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2014-05-20 | 32 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2014-05-21 | 33 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 