HARRIS
NeoPets, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78483386 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Stephanie Yost Cameron |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | GEORGE, DAHLIA AMELIA |
Timeline
| 2004-09-14 | Application Filed |
| 2007-01-18 | Abandon |
| 2007-02-17 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2007-02-17 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  NeoPets, Inc. |
| Address | 450 North Brand Blvd. Glendale DE 91203 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 20 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,022,025,032,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0201 | Non-Metal and Non-Leather Key Chains, Plastic Key Chain Tags, Plastic Name Badges, Paper Photo Frames, Paper Picture Frames, Picture Frames, Novelty Display Boards, Head Supporting Pillows, Pillows |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-09-21 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-04-13 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-04-13 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-04-22 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-04-22 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-10-21 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-10-21 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-11-03 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-11-10 | 9 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-11-10 | 10 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-12-12 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-12-12 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-12-23 | 13 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-01-10 | 14 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-01-11 | 15 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-06-15 | 16 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-06-15 | 17 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-06-15 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-06-22 | 19 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-07-17 | 20 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2006-07-17 | 21 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2007-02-17 | 22 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2007-02-20 | 23 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2007-03-08 | 24 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 